Register to reply

Another really basic question... this time regarding integration.

by Mathguy15
Tags: basic, integration, time
Share this thread:
Jun13-12, 09:20 PM
P: 63
Given a function f define a new function Sf(x) by summing up all values of f(hj)
where 0 ≤ jh < x. That is, if k is such that kh is the largest below x, then
Sf(x) = h[ f(0) + f(h) + f(2h) + .... + f(kh) ]
We call Sf also the ”integral” or ”antiderivative” of f.

The teacher who wrote the lecture notes I'm reading through gives an example of integration. He evaluates Sf(x) for f(x)=1. I don't understand the first sentence:

We have Sf(x) = 0 for x ≤ h.

Why? Sorry for being such a n00b, but I don't understand. Please help me.


By the way, he verifies that the js in the definition are integers.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
Scientists develop 'electronic nose' for rapid detection of C. diff infection
Why plants in the office make us more productive
Tesla Motors dealing as states play factory poker
Jun13-12, 10:52 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 834
Quote Quote by Mathguy15 View Post
We call Sf also the ”integral” or ”antiderivative” of f.
Err, the integral is what you get if you take the limit h -> 0.
Is that word-for-word what is written there?

We have Sf(x) = 0 for x ≤ h.
That doesn't seem right. jh is allowed to equal 0, so the largest integer k such that
0 ≤ kh < x ≤ h is when k=0. So Sf(x) = h f(0) = h.

Edit: Maybe he means x < 0?
Jun14-12, 09:56 AM
P: 63
Well, Yes, that is word-for-word, but I think he's doing a "preliminary" definition before the real definition. And I was thinking the same thing, because Sf(x) isn't defined for x<0.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Extremely Basic Question Regarding Time Dilation Special & General Relativity 6
Basic question about how spin changes in time Quantum Physics 3
Basic time dilation question Special & General Relativity 5
Basic question about the nature of light and time Special & General Relativity 5
Basic Question about space-time Astronomy & Astrophysics 2