Can Poles of Integer Order be Eliminated in the Redefinition of Integrals?

  • Thread starter eljose
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Integral
In summary, the conversation discusses the issue of an integral with a function F(x) that has several poles of integer order r, causing the integral to diverge. The question is whether there is a way to redefine the integral by eliminating the poles and assigning a finite value, possibly using the Cauchy principal value integral. The conversation also mentions the possibility of using residues and integrating over the remaining area, but notes that this only works if the function has only poles as singularities. It is also mentioned that residues only make sense for complex analytic functions and there may not be a way to avoid the singularities of the integrand.
  • #1
eljose
492
0
Let,s suppose we have the integral:

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dxF(x) [/tex]

but unfortunately we have a problem..the function F(x) has several poles of integer order r (r=1,2,3,4...) so it diverges :uhh: :uhh: :uhh: then my question is if there is a form to redefine our integral so it can be assigned a finite value by "eliminating" somehow its poles considering them as residues so finally we have an integral:

[tex] \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dxF(x)+ Res(F) [/tex] where the integral is

finite and Res(F) would be the sum of the residues of F(x) at its poles...or something similar..pehaps with the "Cauchy principal value integral"?...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Of course you can (assuming a finite number of poles): place small circles around the poles and integrate over the remaining area. Of course, if your function has only poles as singularities, then its integral on this new domain is 0 so the integral on the original area is just the sum of the residues. But we knew that already, didn't we?
 
  • #3
but unfortunately we have a problem..the function F(x) has several poles of integer order r (r=1,2,3,4...) so it diverges
That's not the only reason a function may diverge. F(x) also fails to converge to zero as x goes to infinity. And even if it did go to zero, it might not do it fast enough.

Speaking about residues, AFAIK, only make sense if you're talking about complex analytic functions.
 
  • #4
But..is there a way to "avoid" the singularities of the integrand?..
 

What is the definition of integral?

The integral is a mathematical concept that represents the area under a curve on a graph. It is used to calculate the total value of a function over a given interval.

Why is there a need for re-definition of integral?

The traditional definition of integral only applies to continuous functions, but many real-world problems involve non-continuous functions. Therefore, a re-definition of integral is necessary to make it applicable to a wider range of functions.

What are the main differences between the traditional and re-defined integral?

The traditional integral only considers continuous functions, while the re-defined integral can also handle non-continuous functions. Additionally, the re-defined integral allows for more flexibility in the choice of intervals and partitions.

How does the re-definition of integral benefit the field of mathematics?

The re-definition of integral allows for a more comprehensive understanding and application of the concept. It also opens up new possibilities for solving real-world problems and advancing mathematical research.

What are some potential challenges or limitations of the re-definition of integral?

One challenge is that the re-defined integral may be more complex and difficult to understand compared to the traditional integral. Additionally, some functions may still be difficult to integrate even with the re-defined definition. There may also be disagreements and debates among mathematicians about the best approach to re-defining the integral.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
924
  • Calculus
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
737
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Back
Top