Gone fission - where does the energy of the neutrons come from

In summary, the conversation between AM and Morbius on the Nuclear Engineering board discusses whether the energy released in fission is from the nuclear force or the coulomb force. Feynman's quote suggests that it is from the coulomb force, but Morbius argues that most of the energy comes from the nuclear energy produced when a neutron is absorbed by the nucleus. The conversation also addresses where the energetic neutrons come from in fission and how the energy is sufficient to not only free more neutrons from the nucleus, but also give them more kinetic energy. The general consensus is that most of the energy released in fission is from the Coulomb energy difference, with the nuclear energy contributing to the strength of the Coulomb
  • #1
Andrew Mason
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
7,776
474
I have been having an https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=145867&page=3" with Morbius on the Nuclear Engineering board about whether the energy released in fission is from the nuclear force or the coulomb force. This quote from Feynman suggests that the energy is from the coulomb force:
Richard Feynman said:
" There is another question: "What holds the nucleus together?" In a nucleus there are several protons, all of which are positive. Why don't they push themselves apart? It turns out that nuclei there are, in addition to electrical forces, nonelectrical forces, called nuclear forces, which are greater than the electrical forces and which are able to hold the protons together in spite of the electrical repulsion. The nuclear forces, however, have a short range - their force falls off much more rapidly than 1/r2. And this has an important consequence. If a nucleus has too many protons in it, it gets too big, and will not stay together. An example is uranium, with 92 protons. The nuclear forces act mainly between each proton (or neutron) and its nearest neighbor, while the electrical forces act over larger distances, giving a repulsion between each proton and all of the others in the nucleus. The more protons in a nucleus, the stronger is the electrical repulsion, until, as in the case of uranium, the balance is so delicate that the nucleus is almost ready to fly apart from the repulsive electrical force. If such a nucleus is just "tapped" lightly (as can be done by sending in a slow neutron), it breaks into two pieces, each with positive charge, and these pieces fly apart by electrical reuplsion. The energy which is liberated is the energy of the atomic bomb. The energy is usually called "nuclear" energy, but it is really "electrical" energy released when electrical forces have overcome the attractive nuclear forces.

Morbius has persuaded me that Feynman overstated and oversimplified things. Also Feynman's description of the uranium nucleus is really not accurate (since U-235 or 238 are both quite stable). Morbius maintains that, while some of the energy is from the coulomb potential, most of the energy in fission comes from the nuclear energy produced when a neutron is absorbed by the nucleus.

My question is this: where do the energetic neutrons come from in fission? If the energy comes from the nuclear force yanking the neutron in and giving it such tremendous energy, how is it that this energy is sufficient to not only free more than one other neutron from the nucleus (which would have to overcome their binding energies which would be at least as great as the binding energy ofthe incoming neutron) but to also give the free neutrons more kinetic energy than the incoming neutron had?

AM
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Andrew Mason said:
I have been having an https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=145867&page=3" with Morbius on the Nuclear Engineering board about whether the energy released in fission is from the nuclear force or the coulomb force. This quote from Feynman suggests that the energy is from the coulomb force:


Morbius has persuaded me that Feynman overstated and oversimplified things. Also Feynman's description of the uranium nucleus is really not accurate (since U-235 or 238 are both quite stable). Morbius maintains that, while some of the energy is from the coulomb potential, most of the energy in fission comes from the nuclear energy produced when a neutron is absorbed by the nucleus.

My question is this: where do the energetic neutrons come from in fission? If the energy comes from the nuclear force yanking the neutron in and giving it such tremendous energy, how is it that this energy is sufficient to not only free more than one other neutron from the nucleus (which would have to overcome their binding energies which would be at least as great as the binding energy ofthe incoming neutron) but to also give the free neutrons more kinetic energy than the incoming neutron had?

AM
Most of the energy released in fission is from the Coulomb energy difference.
This can be verilfied either by comparing Coulomb energy for two uniformly charged spheres with R=1.2 A^{1/3} with the original sphere of uranium, or by calculating the Coulomb energy for two touching spheres. Most of the energy shows up in the nuclear mass differences. The energy carried off by neutrons is small compared to either the mass differences or the Coulomb calculation (which are comparable). The actual mechanism by which an iindividual neutron gets its escape energy may be related to the nuclear interaction,but the energy involved in that is only a small part of the destructive power.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
It is generally accepted that the nucleus of a fissile nuclide, when excited by the absorption of a neutron, then fissions when the Coulomb repulsion of what becomes the two new nuclides (fission products) overcomes the nuclear binding forces. Approximately 168 MeV of the 198-207 MeV released during the fission process is manifest in the kinetic energy of the two radionuclides. The two or three fission neutrons share about 5 MeV. Prompt gammas account for about 7 MeV. Decay of fission prodcuts release 8, 7 and 12 MeV in the form of betas, gammas and neutrinos, respectively.

Gamma-rays from the absorption of neutrons contribute about 3-12 MeV.

The nuclear energy contributes to the strength of the Coulomb repulsion, because it is the nuclear binding that pulls the nucleons 'close' together, which means the Coulomb forces are significant.

When a neutron is absorbed by a fissile nucleus, it is generally assumed that the nucleus begins an oscillation in which two charge distributions form, i.e. it departs from a effectively spherical charge distribution. At some point the separation (distance) between the charge center is such that Coulomb repulsion exceeds the nuclear attraction and two nucleir are formed. The two or three (and rarely four) neutrons either escape from the fissioning nucleus, or they are released from either fission product (radionuclide). There are several nuclides which release 'delayed' neutrons as decay products, rather than gamma radiation, e.g. Br-87. The fission process takes about a microsecond or less.

Also it is possible that U-235 absorbs a neutron and does not fission, but rather the excited nucleus, U-236, emits a gamma ray and is stable. U-236 may absorb a neutron to form U-237, and both U-236 and U-237 decay by beta emission to from Np-236 and Np-237 respectively. Similary, Pu-239 may fission or it may decay to more stable Pu-240, and Pu-240 may absorb a neutron and decay to Pu-241, which is fissile.

Nuclides like U-238 and Pu-240 require fast neutrons to fission.
 
  • #4
Astronuc said:
When a neutron is absorbed by a fissile nucleus, it is generally assumed that the nucleus begins an oscillation in which two charge distributions form, i.e. it departs from a effectively spherical charge distribution. At some point the separation (distance) between the charge center is such that Coulomb repulsion exceeds the nuclear attraction and two nucleir are formed. The two or three (and rarely four) neutrons either escape from the fissioning nucleus, or they are released from either fission product (radionuclide). There are several nuclides which release 'delayed' neutrons as decay products, rather than gamma radiation, e.g. Br-87. The fission process takes about a microsecond or less.
So where does the energy of the prompt neutrons come from - those produced in the fissioning process itself? It can't come from coulomb repulsion directly since the neutron has no charge. What gives them enough energy to overcome their binding energy to other nucleons and fly away alone?

AM
 
  • #5
Andrew Mason said:
So where does the energy of the prompt neutrons come from - those produced in the fissioning process itself? It can't come from coulomb repulsion directly since the neutron has no charge. What gives them enough energy to overcome their binding energy to other nucleons and fly away alone?
That's a good question, and I'll have to look into it further. Either its from radionuclides which have excess energy, or perhaps they are the neutrons which are being 'pulled' by both fission product radionuclei, and the net force from both radionuclides slingshots the individual neutrons out from the region between the two charge/nuclear regions that will form the new nuclei. Pardon the crude description.
 

1. Where does the energy of the neutrons in a fission reaction come from?

The energy of the neutrons in a fission reaction comes from the splitting of atomic nuclei. When a large unstable nucleus, such as uranium-235, is struck by a neutron, it can split into two smaller nuclei and release a large amount of energy in the form of heat and radiation.

2. How is the energy of neutrons harnessed in a nuclear power plant?

The energy of neutrons in a fission reaction is harnessed in a nuclear power plant by controlling the chain reaction. The neutrons released during fission are used to strike other nuclei, causing them to split and release more neutrons. This creates a chain reaction, with each fission producing more energy. The heat generated by this process is then used to produce steam, which turns turbines and generates electricity.

3. Can the energy of neutrons be used for other purposes besides generating electricity?

Yes, the energy of neutrons can be used for other purposes besides electricity generation. In addition to producing heat, the energy of neutrons can also be used for medical purposes, such as cancer treatment, and for research in areas such as nuclear physics and materials science.

4. Is the energy of neutrons unlimited?

The energy of neutrons is not unlimited. While the amount of energy released by a single fission reaction is significant, it is not an infinite source of energy. Additionally, the process of extracting and using this energy can have environmental impacts and produce radioactive waste, making it important to carefully monitor and manage its use.

5. Are there any safety concerns surrounding the energy of neutrons?

Yes, there are safety concerns surrounding the energy of neutrons. The process of controlling and containing a nuclear chain reaction requires strict safety protocols to prevent accidents and the release of dangerous levels of radiation. Additionally, the disposal of nuclear waste must be carefully managed to avoid potential health and environmental risks.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
814
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
17
Views
2K
Back
Top