Did Einstein guess the time-dilation equation?

  • Thread starter Brainv2.1beta
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Einstein
In summary: Einstein just copied the result from Lorentz and reinterpreted it in his own relativistic manner.Lorentz and another dude(sorry for forgetting your name) worked out the effect of dilation of time and the shorter ruler, something,in the framework of classical electrodynamics.In summary, Einstein "guessed" the time-dilation equation. Furthermore, supposed "proofs" could be hoaxes.
  • #1
Brainv2.1beta
20
0
Did Einstein "guess" the time-dilation equation?

I can't find anything on the net, but it seems to me that Einstein would have had to "guess" the time dilation into existence. Furthermore, supposed "proofs" could be hoaxes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Brainv2.1beta said:
I can't find anything on the net, but it seems to me that Einstein would have had to "guess" the time dilation into existence. Furthermore, supposed "proofs" could be hoaxes.
No, it can easily be derived from the Lorentz transformation equations, which Einstein derived in his 1905 paper from the two basic postulates of relativity (that the laws of physics should work the same in all inertial reference frames, and that the speed of light should be the same in all inertial reference frames). Einstein's derivation of the Lorentz transformation is a little hard to follow compared to derivations I've seen in textbooks, but I wrote up a post where I tried to follow along and explain the steps on this thread if you want to give it a shot.
 
  • #3
JesseM said:
No, it can easily be derived from the Lorentz transformation equations, which Einstein derived in his 1905 paper from the two basic postulates of relativity (that the laws of physics should work the same in all inertial reference frames, and that the speed of light should be the same in all inertial reference frames). Einstein's derivation of the Lorentz transformation is a little hard to follow compared to derivations I've seen in textbooks, but I wrote up a post where I tried to follow along and explain the steps on this thread if you want to give it a shot.

Cool! When I get some energy I'll give it a try.
 
  • #4
Brainv2.1beta said:
I can't find anything on the net, but it seems to me that Einstein would have had to "guess" the time dilation into existence.

not anymore than Pythagoras guessed at a2 + b2 = c2 . that fact, plus the premise that the laws of physics (including parameters in those laws such c) are the same for every inertial observer; put those two together and you have the time dilation formula.
 
  • #5
It also follows directly from Minkowski's unification - one side of the Pythagorean triangle being ct' and the other distance vt. (ct')^2 + (vt)^2 = (ct)^2
 
  • #6
Einstein's proof of relativity

I wasnt sure really how to get it out there on a broader level, but the document attached is something I wrote for Physics A level a few years ago. I researched Einstein's theory of relativity and tried to write in in as much Layman terms as I could. The final document got sent to the science association for good work. There are a few spelling errors here and there but it gives an easy to understand view of what Einstein was on about and why time dilates, we get heavier at high speeds etc. For time dilation just search for it, and there is a heading of it. Have a read. Its not too long and i think you'll like it. Teenager's huh!
 

Attachments

  • Physics Relativity.pdf
    350 KB · Views: 379
  • #7
Brainv2.1beta said:
I can't find anything on the net, but it seems to me that Einstein would have had to "guess" the time dilation into existence. Furthermore, supposed "proofs" could be hoaxes.

No,he just copied the result from Lorentz and reinterpret in his own relativistic manner.Lorentz and another dude(sorry for forgeting your name) worked out the effect of dilation of time and the shorter ruler, something,in the framework of classical electrodynamics.
 
  • #8
aristurtle said:
No,he just copied the result from Lorentz and reinterpret in his own relativistic manner.Lorentz and another dude(sorry for forgeting your name) worked out the effect of dilation of time and the shorter ruler, something,in the framework of classical electrodynamics.
He may have been partly inspired by Lorentz's ad hoc equations, but Einstein showed that if you started from the two fundamental postulates of relativity (laws of physics work the same in every inertial frame, speed of light the same in every inertial frame), you could derive the Lorentz transformation from this, and you can in turn derive the equations for time dilation and length contraction from the Lorentz transformation.
 
  • #9
Thanks for this one.
 
  • #10
aristurtle said:
No,he just copied the result from Lorentz and reinterpret in his own relativistic manner.Lorentz and another dude(sorry for forgeting your name) worked out the effect of dilation of time and the shorter ruler, something,in the framework of classical electrodynamics.

The other guy who worked out the effect of time dilation was Joseph Larmor (1897 and 1900).

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Larmor
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Lorentz_transformations

Regards,
 
  • #11
JesseM said:
He may have been partly inspired by Lorentz's ad hoc equations, but Einstein showed that if you started from the two fundamental postulates of relativity (laws of physics work the same in every inertial frame, speed of light the same in every inertial frame), you could derive the Lorentz transformation from this, and you can in turn derive the equations for time dilation and length contraction from the Lorentz transformation.
I know that this is what just about every introductory book says, but it still isn't really true. The postulates are mathematically ill-defined, mainly because they use the concept "inertial frame" without defining it in advance. I spent some time a few months ago thinking about how to turn Einstein's "postulates" into well-defined axioms, and this is what I came up with:

Space-time is a pair (M,A) where M is a topological space and A a set of homeomorphisms from M onto [itex]\mathbb{R}^4[/itex], such that the corresponding group of transition functions is the set of all smooth maps that a) take straight lines to straight lines, b) tilt the 0 axis by the same amount but in the opposite direction as the inverse map, and c) have non-constant parts that preserve the light-cone at the origin.

The homeomorphisms mentioned in the beginning are what I would call "global coordinate systems". What I mean by a "transition function" is a map [itex]x\circ y^{-1}[/itex], where x and y are global coordinate systems. What I mean by the "non-constant part" of a function is what you get if you Taylor expand the function and throw away the zeroth order term. (This turns an arbitrary Lorentz transformation into a homogeneous Lorentz transformation). The group of transition functions defined this way is of course the Poincaré group. We can now define an inertial frame as "any member of A".

We could of course replace my axiom above with the one-liner "Space-time is Minkowski space" and define inertial frames as isometries of the metric. The point of doing it the way I did is just that it includes versions of Einstein's "postulates" explicitly (b and c).

I'm not trying to say that there's something wrong with Einstein's postulates. My point is just that they should be thought of as a check list, not as axioms. It's a list of properties that Einstein expected the theory he was looking for to have. The idea is to try to find a theory that has those properties and throw away all other theories we find along the way. We can use any method we want while doing that, no matter how non-rigorous, because once we have found an actual theory, only experiments can tell if it's a good theory or not.
 
  • #12
Fredrik said:
We could of course replace my axiom above with the one-liner "Space-time is Minkowski space"
It does save a lot of typing :smile:
 

1. Did Einstein really guess the time-dilation equation?

Yes, Einstein did guess the time-dilation equation as part of his theory of special relativity. However, his guess was based on extensive research and experiments, and was later proven to be accurate through further experimentation and observation.

2. How did Einstein come up with the time-dilation equation?

Einstein's time-dilation equation was a result of his thought experiments and mathematical calculations, which were based on the principles of relativity and the speed of light. He also used previous research and experiments by other scientists to help support his theory.

3. Was Einstein the first person to discover the time-dilation equation?

No, Einstein was not the first person to discover the time-dilation equation. Other scientists, such as Hendrik Lorentz and Henri Poincaré, had also developed similar equations that described the effects of time dilation. However, Einstein's equation was the first to be widely accepted and supported by evidence.

4. How accurate is Einstein's time-dilation equation?

Einstein's time-dilation equation has been proven to be highly accurate in predicting the effects of time dilation in various experiments and observations. It has also been used in numerous technological advancements, such as GPS systems, which rely on the accuracy of time dilation calculations.

5. Can the time-dilation equation be applied to all situations?

The time-dilation equation is a fundamental part of the theory of relativity and is applicable in all situations where objects are moving at high speeds or in strong gravitational fields. However, it may not accurately describe certain phenomena, such as quantum effects, and is constantly being researched and refined by scientists.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
22
Views
954
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
597
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
61
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
138
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
942
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
53
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
406
Back
Top