|Mar20-13, 06:38 PM||#1|
is Wronskian sign arbitrary?
On my DE test, I was asked to determine if two solutions to a DE are fundamental solutions.
So I confirmed they were both solutions, and took the Wronskian, which was nonzero.
I got points marked off, and he put a minus sign in front of my wronskian result.
Isn't the sign of the Wronskian determined by what function I call y1 and what function I call y2 and is thus completely arbitrary?
|Mar20-13, 10:36 PM||#2|
Yes the sign on the Wronskian is determined by the ordering that you assign to the functions. It's a weak excuse, but the grader was probably just comparing your answer with their solution sheet and saw the sign difference and didn't think about why they were different.
|Mar25-13, 09:38 AM||#3|
Well, I looked at the test and on the paper the functions were called y1 and y2 already, and in my work I did write W[y1,y2] = my wronskian.
So I guess I can understand. I don't think I'll argue this one. I noticed that the wronskian order is arbitrary early off and have just been taking the easier derivative first.
|Similar Threads for: is Wronskian sign arbitrary?|
|The Wronskian and the Derivative of the Wronskian||Calculus & Beyond Homework||2|
|I have a Wronskian Question?If the Wronskian W of f and g is t^2*e^t||Differential Equations||3|
|Can Wronskian be used for all?||Differential Equations||4|
|Wronskian||Calculus & Beyond Homework||2|
|Wronskian||Calculus & Beyond Homework||7|