Solving Circuit Equations with Mesh and Nodal Analysis

In summary: I have gotten. solving for I2 using the second equation, I get i_{2} = \frac{96*i_{s}+V_{s}}{128} and then...
  • #1
chrizzilla
7
0

Homework Statement


The circuit shown has two inputs, [tex]V_{s}[/tex] and [tex]i_{s}[/tex] and one output [tex]V_{o}[/tex]. The output is related to the input by the equation [tex]V_{o}=ai_{s}+bV_{s}[/tex] where a and b are constants to be determined. determine the values a and b by (a) writing and solving mesh equations and (b) writing and solving node equations.

attachment.php?attachmentid=32304&stc=1&d=1298008717.jpg


Homework Equations


Kirchoff's Voltage Law (Sum of voltages in a closed loop = 0)
Kirchoff's Current Law (Sum of currents at a node = 0)
Ohm's Law ([tex]V=IR[/tex])


The Attempt at a Solution


Loop 1 ([tex]i_{1}[/tex])
[tex]-V+96(i_{1}-i_{2})+120(i_{1}-i_{3})=0[/tex]

Loop 2 ([tex]i_{2}[/tex])
[tex]96(i_{2}-i_{1})+32i_{2}-V_{s}=0[/tex]

Loop 3 ([tex]i_{3}[/tex])
[tex]120(i_{3}-i_{2})+V_{s}+30i_{3}=0[/tex]

Constraint
[tex]i_{1} = i_{s}[/tex]

How am I to solve for anything? I have 5 equations and eight unknowns ([tex]V, V_{s}, i_{s}, i_{1}, i_{2}, i_{3}, a, b[/tex]). I know these equations are right because my professor helped the class set up all of the homework problems on Monday. I just don't know how to find V. Please help!
 

Attachments

  • Circuit.jpg
    Circuit.jpg
    12.1 KB · Views: 474
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
chrizzilla said:

Homework Statement


The circuit shown has two inputs, [tex]V_{s}[/tex] and [tex]i_{s}[/tex] and one output [tex]V_{o}[/tex]. The output is related to the input by the equation [tex]V_{o}=ai_{s}+bV_{s}[/tex] where a and b are constants to be determined. determine the values a and b by (a) writing and solving mesh equations and (b) writing and solving node equations.

attachment.php?attachmentid=32304&stc=1&d=1298008717.jpg


Homework Equations


Kirchoff's Voltage Law (Sum of voltages in a closed loop = 0)
Kirchoff's Current Law (Sum of currents at a node = 0)
Ohm's Law ([tex]V=IR[/tex])


The Attempt at a Solution


Loop 1 ([tex]i_{1}[/tex])
[tex]-V+96(i_{1}-i_{2})+120(i_{1}-i_{3})=0[/tex]

Loop 2 ([tex]i_{2}[/tex])
[tex]96(i_{2}-i_{1})+32i_{2}-V_{s}=0[/tex]

Loop 3 ([tex]i_{3}[/tex])
[tex]120(i_{3}-i_{2})+V_{s}+30i_{3}=0[/tex]

Constraint
[tex]i_{1} = i_{s}[/tex]

How am I to solve for anything? I have 5 equations and eight unknowns ([tex]V, V_{s}, i_{s}, i_{1}, i_{2}, i_{3}, a, b[/tex]). I know these equations are right because my professor helped the class set up all of the homework problems on Monday. I just don't know how to find V. Please help!

What do you get if you use KCL equations instead? ( it works either way )
 
  • #3
there's no way you'll get a real number from your equations. considering the only values given are resistances. The is probably why we are trying to get a solution that has some constants.(a and b). not really sure how to solve for a and b though
 
  • #4
a hint for V: when you have 2+ independent sources, consider superposition.

also, you don't have 5 equations with 8 unknowns. Is, Vs are given. a and b is what eventually you are looking for, in terms of the other variables.

try it again, and you should have just the right amount of equations to help you solve for a and b.
 
  • #5
a hint for V: when you have 2+ independent sources, consider superposition.

also, you don't have 5 equations with 8 unknowns. Is, Vs are given. a and b is what eventually you are looking for, in terms of the other variables.

try it again, and you should have just the right amount of equations to help you solve for a and b.

Hmm, I am confused. I know that V0=30*I3 and Is=I1, but I don't know how to get V, so I can't actually get Vs.
 
  • #6
chrizzilla said:
Hmm, I am confused. I know that V0=30*I3 and Is=I1, but I don't know how to get V, so I can't actually get Vs.

You don't need to "get" Vs; Vs is a given. You need to "get" Vo, and it will be in terms of Vs and Is.

Get rid of that Loop 1 equation you have; this one:

[tex]-V+96(i_{1}-i_{2})+120(i_{1}-i_{3})=0[/tex]

Your loop1 equation should be just the constraint equation, I1 = Is.

Take that together with your loop2 and loop3 equations and solve.

Your unknowns are I1, I2 and I3. Vs and Is are not unknowns; they are given. Just leave them in symbolic form and solve your 3 simultaneous equations.

You will get expressions for I1, I2 and I3. V will be given by: V = 32*I2 + 30*I3; Vo will be just Vo = 30 * I3

As a hint, and to help you have confidence in your work, the expression for I3 is:

[tex]I3 = \frac{120*Is -Vs}{150}[/tex]
 
  • #7
The Electrician said:
You don't need to "get" Vs; Vs is a given. You need to "get" Vo, and it will be in terms of Vs and Is.

Get rid of that Loop 1 equation you have; this one:

[tex]-V+96(i_{1}-i_{2})+120(i_{1}-i_{3})=0[/tex]

Your loop1 equation should be just the constraint equation, I1 = Is.

Take that together with your loop2 and loop3 equations and solve.

Your unknowns are I1, I2 and I3. Vs and Is are not unknowns; they are given. Just leave them in symbolic form and solve your 3 simultaneous equations.

You will get expressions for I1, I2 and I3. V will be given by: V = 32*I2 + 30*I3; Vo will be just Vo = 30 * I3

As a hint, and to help you have confidence in your work, the expression for I3 is:

[tex]I3 = \frac{120*Is -Vs}{150}[/tex]

hmm, well, that is not what I have gotten. solving for I2 using the second equation, I get [tex]i_{2} = \frac{96*i_{s}+V_{s}}{128}[/tex] and then using that in the third equation, I get [tex]i_{3} = \frac{960*i_{s}-V_{s}}{1920}[/tex], which is nowhere near what you got.

Also, everyone keeps saying Is and Vs are given. How do you figure? I don't see how that is possible!
 
Last edited:
  • #8
chrizzilla said:
hmm, well, that is not what I have gotten. solving for I2 using the second equation, I get [tex]i_{2} = \frac{96*i_{s}+V_{s}}{128}[/tex] and then using that in the third equation, I get [tex]i_{3} = \frac{960*i_{s}-V_{s}}{1920}[/tex], which is nowhere near what you got.


You have for the third equation:

[tex]120(i_{3}-i_{2})+V_{s}+30i_{3}=0[/tex]

It should be:

[tex]120(i_{3}-i_{1})+V_{s}+30i_{3}=0[/tex]

Try solving with this corrected equation 3.

chrizzilla said:
Also, everyone keeps saying Is and Vs are given. How do you figure? I don't see how that is possible!

I don't understand what the problem is. You've already treated Is and Vs as givens when you derived:

[tex]i_{2} = \frac{96*i_{s}+V_{s}}{128}[/tex]

The unknowns in this problem are I1, I2 and I3; Is and Vs are assumed to be known. After you derive the expressions involving Is and Vs, you can substitute numeric values for them later if that should be needed.

When you learned algebra, you should have learned how to work with literal variables.

If you want to solve the general quadratic equation:

[tex]a x^2 + b x + c = 0[/tex]

you understand that the unknown is x and the variables a, b and c are given, even though they're letters (literals) rather than numeric quantities.

This circuit problem is the same.
 
  • #9
The Electrician said:
You have for the third equation:

[tex]120(i_{3}-i_{2})+V_{s}+30i_{3}=0[/tex]

It should be:

[tex]120(i_{3}-i_{1})+V_{s}+30i_{3}=0[/tex]

Try solving with this corrected equation 3.

Oops, you're right, that's my bad.

The Electrician said:
I don't understand what the problem is. You've already treated Is and Vs as givens when you derived:

[tex]i_{2} = \frac{96*i_{s}+V_{s}}{128}[/tex]

The unknowns in this problem are I1, I2 and I3; Is and Vs are assumed to be known. After you derive the expressions involving Is and Vs, you can substitute numeric values for them later if that should be needed.

When you learned algebra, you should have learned how to work with literal variables.

If you want to solve the general quadratic equation:

[tex]a x^2 + b x + c = 0[/tex]

you understand that the unknown is x and the variables a, b and c are given, even though they're letters (literals) rather than numeric quantities.

This circuit problem is the same.

You will have to forgive me, I misunderstood what you meant by "given." I assumed that you were seeing that these were given as numbers somewhere.

using V0=30I3 and substituting for I3 I get
[tex]30*((120*Is -Vs)/(150))=a*i_{s}+b*V_{s}[/tex]

or

[tex](120i_{s}-V_{s})/5=a*i_{s}+b*V_{s}[/tex]

At this point I still need to find the values of a and b, obviously, and I need a value for Is and Vs in order to do that. I can't see how this is accomplished with the information that I have.
 
  • #10
a = 120/5 and b = -1/5

a is simply the coefficient of Is in your expression and b is the coefficient of Vs.
 
  • #11
The Electrician said:
a = 120/5 and b = -1/5

a is simply the coefficient of Is in your expression and b is the coefficient of Vs.

wow... that's correct. why did I not see that? I feel like an idiot now... Thank you so much good sir.
 

1. What is Mesh Analysis and how does it differ from Nodal Analysis?

Mesh Analysis is a method used to solve electrical circuits by analyzing the current flow through individual loops in the circuit. Nodal Analysis, on the other hand, focuses on the voltage at various nodes (connection points) in the circuit. Both methods use Ohm's Law and Kirchhoff's Laws to solve the circuit, but they approach it from different perspectives.

2. When should I use Mesh Analysis instead of Nodal Analysis?

Mesh Analysis is best used when the circuit contains several current sources and only a few voltage sources. It is also helpful when there are many parallel branches in the circuit. Nodal Analysis, on the other hand, is more suitable for circuits with many voltage sources and few current sources.

3. Can I use both Mesh and Nodal Analysis in the same circuit?

Yes, it is possible to use both methods in the same circuit. In fact, it is often helpful to use a combination of both methods to solve a complex circuit. This allows you to approach the circuit from different perspectives and verify your results.

4. Are there any limitations to using Mesh and Nodal Analysis?

One limitation of Mesh Analysis is that it can only be applied to planar circuits (circuits that can be drawn on a flat surface without any overlapping lines). Nodal Analysis, on the other hand, can be used for any type of circuit. Additionally, both methods can become more complex and time-consuming for circuits with a large number of elements.

5. How do I know if I have solved a circuit correctly using Mesh or Nodal Analysis?

To ensure accuracy, it is always a good idea to double-check your results using Kirchhoff's Laws. Additionally, you can use simulation software or build the circuit and measure the values to compare with your calculations. If your results match, then you have likely solved the circuit correctly.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
773
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
487
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
456
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
229
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top