What is the Future of Theoretical Physics and How Can I Make a Living Out of It?

In summary: I would advise you to continue your studies and take an engineering subject alongside to give yourself a better chance of finding a job. Most people with a physics degree end up teaching in high schools and colleges.
  • #1
DrPhoton
28
0
Okay Hello Forum
Im a student in high school atm
and I am extremely passionate about Mathematics(pure and computational) and Theoretical Physics
I may be young and ambitious and whatnot at this point of my life but I'd really love some feedback to guide me on a clearer path... so I wanted to go into Quantum Field theory and I was debating with my dad earlier ..according to him you need to take an engineering subject alongside so as to be on the safe side of things but to be honest I am more focussed on the theoretical side of Physics . Anyway so my questions are as follows and any correction in my notion of becoming a physicist would be appreciated.
1) Does the theoretical side of Physics have any scope in today's day and age?
2) Assuming that I wanted to go into Quantum field theory and whatnot , what would I be doing after my Masters ? or phD for that matter ... As in how would I go about making a living out of it?
3)What is the future of Theoretical Physics?
4) The job market and job opportunities? Do most people with a Physics degree end up teaching in high schools and whatnot?

P.S. I apologise for the poor presentation of my questions , I am very young but I need to know and I'd love to correct any wrong notions I possesses so please go easy on me :P

Thank you !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Note that in the field of physics "theoretical" has a meaning that is different than it is to the public. What the public calls "theoretical physics" the physics community would call "hypothetical physics".

Every field in physics has theorists working in it. Condensed matter, optics, biophysics, high energy, astronomy/cosmology - They all have theorists and experimentalist and the distinction between the two is often blurry. Also take care not to confuse a field of physics with a theory of physics. Quantum field theory is a theory, it is used in multiple fields of physics.

The job market is tough for everyone and physics is no exception. You won't really have any job specific skills after studying physics, you will be educated in physics. The natural thing to do after a physics BS is to go to graduate school to get some marketable skills (or continue on the path to academia).
 
  • #3
My story is almost the same friend,
about bachelor's in engineering, my physics proff told me that it is a kinda back up option to make up the living
and ya, most of the physicist end up teaching in universities
 
  • #4
ModusPwnd said:
Note that in the field of physics "theoretical" has a meaning that is different than it is to the public. What the public calls "theoretical physics" the physics community would call "hypothetical physics".

Every field in physics has theorists working in it. Condensed matter, optics, biophysics, high energy, astronomy/cosmology - They all have theorists and experimentalist and the distinction between the two is often blurry. Also take care not to confuse a field of physics with a theory of physics. Quantum field theory is a theory, it is used in multiple fields of physics.

The job market is tough for everyone and physics is no exception. You won't really have any job specific skills after studying physics, you will be educated in physics. The natural thing to do after a physics BS is to go to graduate school to get some marketable skills (or continue on the path to academia).


Yes i understand the distinction between theorists and experimentalists and that they exist in every field ... but the thing is I am not too fond of the engineering side and I want to be immersed in the theoretical part of it , Id like to do what the hotshots of physics have done , Feynman , Einstein , Schrodinger , Heisenberg , Pauli etc... I'd like to discover and explore .. but the only thing that distresses me is making a living out of it all , how did these great physicists manage ?
 
  • #5
Viru.universe said:
My story is almost the same friend,
about bachelor's in engineering, my physics proff told me that it is a kinda back up option to make up the living
and ya, most of the physicist end up teaching in universities

But say your not as fortunate as those who end up teaching in universities? End up teaching a high school class then what? and I really don't want to deviate towards engineering :/ I am really passionate about the theoretical side of physics , that's where my interest deeply lies
 
  • #6
Alright let me add a few more points of information.
Now considering that the job market for physicists isn't too great , let's assume I've got a backup plan for making money or that i hail from a very rich family.. then should taking an engineering course be a necessity? I mean the only reason folks take an engineering course alongside is to have a way of making decent amount of money and maybe applying concepts learnt..
but here's my question
If I have sufficient funds to support me , is taking an engineering course even necessary?
I originally want to major in Maths and Physics (Bachelors) but all this debating has really confused me...

Please help !
 
  • #7
You generally only take engineering courses if your major is engineering. If you are majoring in math and physics then you probably won't have time to take engineering classes.
 
  • #8
ModusPwnd said:
You generally only take engineering courses if your major is engineering. If you are majoring in math and physics then you probably won't have time to take engineering classes.
Yes I agree but my parent says I should drop the math major and go for an engineering major alongside physics ? What should I do? I really want to major in math and physics , I've always wanted to be a mathematician/physicist and I am well aware of how much time and work it asks for... so are you saying there's no point of co-majoring in engineering as long as you've got an alternative source of income ?

Also note that I wasnt considering co-majoring in engineering because I wanted to..
 
  • #9
No, I am not saying anything of the sort. Your issue seems to be an interpersonal one between you and your family. Personally, I never asked my parents for permission on what I should major in. But then, I was not financially dependent on them so I was free to choose what I did.
 
  • #10
DrPhoton said:
Id like to do what the hotshots of physics have done , Feynman , Einstein , Schrodinger , Heisenberg , Pauli etc... I'd like to discover and explore .. but the only thing that distresses me is making a living out of it all , how did these great physicists manage ?

It was a different time back then my friend. If money is something you value greatly then I would suggest not going into science. You will be in school for 10+ years, get paid around 25 000/year +/- 10-20k depending what institution you are at for grad and post doc.

So what I'm saying is that if you are not ready to be under paid for the amount of labour you will endure, if you think you can buy a house by the time your in your early 30s(not to mention the chances of getting a position in physics after all that is slim to none and even worse getting a teaching position), you should definitely go into something else. This is the reality
 
  • #11
jimmyly said:
It was a different time back then my friend. If money is something you value greatly then I would suggest not going into science. You will be in school for 10+ years, get paid around 25 000/year +/- 10-20k depending what institution you are at for grad and post doc.

So what I'm saying is that if you are not ready to be under paid for the amount of labour you will endure, if you think you can buy a house by the time your in your early 30s(not to mention the chances of getting a position in physics after all that is slim to none and even worse getting a teaching position), you should definitely go into something else. This is the reality

Nononono Money is not something I am after at all , its all about the science I would never even consider science if it was for the money... I am passionate about learning and exploring ... but my problem is that my guardians are worried about the job market I try my best to convince them that I won't end up homeless but they don't seem to understand and I've got an idea to make money to PAY FOR MY TUITION Fees and other needs but my parents suggested that I take an engineering course as a way of generating income (which I don't really care about , 25k is enough for me )
but my question is ... How do I convince my parents that physicists have a future and engineering isn't a requisite course to survive in the so called "real world" :/ I know this is a personal problem but I really need help ! I am not worried about the income that Ill generate at this point all I need is a convincing argument to present to my parents and If you will , please outline what options are present for a person after completion of Masters (physics) and ofcourse after PhD... at what point does research start? where professors take you under their wing?
Once again excuse me for my informality.
 
  • #12
ModusPwnd said:
No, I am not saying anything of the sort. Your issue seems to be an interpersonal one between you and your family. Personally, I never asked my parents for permission on what I should major in. But then, I was not financially dependent on them so I was free to choose what I did.

Would you elaborate on the "not being financially dependent on your parents" , how did you pay for tuition fees and other expenses?
 
  • #13
DrPhoton said:
Would you elaborate on the "not being financially dependent on your parents" , how did you pay for tuition fees and other expenses?

Most people get a job :)
 
  • #14
DrPhoton said:
Nononono Money is not something I am after at all , its all about the science I would never even consider science if it was for the money... I am passionate about learning and exploring ... but my problem is that my guardians are worried about the job market I try my best to convince them that I won't end up homeless but they don't seem to understand and I've got an idea to make money to PAY FOR MY TUITION Fees and other needs but my parents suggested that I take an engineering course as a way of generating income (which I don't really care about , 25k is enough for me )
but my question is ... How do I convince my parents that physicists have a future and engineering isn't a requisite course to survive in the so called "real world" :/ I know this is a personal problem but I really need help ! I am not worried about the income that Ill generate at this point all I need is a convincing argument to present to my parents and If you will , please outline what options are present for a person after completion of Masters (physics) and ofcourse after PhD... at what point does research start? where professors take you under their wing?
Once again excuse me for my informality.

Well first off you will not be generating income outside of grad school, it will be impossible to work full time, study, research, TA etc. Grad school usually keeps people very busy(from what I've heard its not impossible, just very unlikely).

After getting your bachelors in physics you have many options. Medical physics, Geophysics, engineering grad school, physics grad school etc.

What is more important than the major itself is what skills you have developed. Programming, electronics etc. Which are marketable.
 
  • #15
DrPhoton said:
Would you elaborate on the "not being financially dependent on your parents" , how did you pay for tuition fees and other expenses?

I worked, took out loans and govt. grants. I started college at 19 after I was living on my own, my parents had nothing to do with it. (Maybe if they did I would have a more useful engineering degree... but probably not :wink:)
How do I convince my parents that physicists have a future and engineering isn't a requisite course to survive in the so called "real world" :/ I know this is a personal problem but I really need help ! I am not worried about the income that Ill generate at this point all I need is a convincing argument to present to my parents and If you will , please outline what options are present for a person after completion of Masters (physics) and ofcourse after PhD... at what point does research start? where professors take you under their wing?

Just tell them the truth. You don't care about money and want to do physics regardless of what it may or may not offer you.

If you are serious about doing physics for a career, you start doing research as an undergrad. Usually in your 3rd year, but the earlier the better.

In the end, it probably won't matter that much. Most people do not get a career doing what they envision and many get one that is not related to their degree at all.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
The American Physical Society has some statistical data on physics careers.

http://www.aps.org/careers/statistics/index.cfm

I'm a PhD student studying theoretical plasma physics/nuclear fusion. I can tell you that all of my friends who have graduated within the last few years have had no problem finding well paying jobs.

Many graduate physics programs offer teaching assistantships or research assistantships for their graduate students. Theses assistantships usually wave tuition and provide a small stipend to cover rent and food.

Finally I encourage you to keep an open mind. There are many unsolved frontiers is theoretical physics, so don't limit yourself to the ones that get the most popularization.
 
  • #17
the_wolfman said:
The American Physical Society has some statistical data on physics careers.

http://www.aps.org/careers/statistics/index.cfm

I'm a PhD student studying theoretical plasma physics/nuclear fusion. I can tell you that all of my friends who have graduated within the last few years have had no problem finding well paying jobs.

Many graduate physics programs offer teaching assistantships or research assistantships for their graduate students. Theses assistantships usually wave tuition and provide a small stipend to cover rent and food.

Finally I encourage you to keep an open mind. There are many unsolved frontiers is theoretical physics, so don't limit yourself to the ones that get the most popularization.

Nicce :D alright so I have gist of what I am to do and what not to do but once again I shall ask you whether or not I should major in a certain engineering field alongside physics? but that would mean not majoring math (which I am averse to ) and Yes I shouldn't localize myself to a certain part of physics.. Thank you all for your help !
 
  • #18
One thing to keep in mind regarding money is simply that saying you don't care about money is an extremely idealistic and unrealistic point of view. I once shared this same point of view but as the years roll on, it slowly dawns on you that money is very important. I don't mean being greedy and trying to make millions, that's a whole 'nother story. I mean earning a decent living to support yourself and your family. As time goes by you will have responsibilities to many other people besides yourself.

I was once idealistic and kept saying that I don't care about money. Well, you know what? I'm married now, and we are thinking about kids. Trying doing that on 30k/year, working 12-14+ hour days and moving to a new city every year or two when the PI loses his grant money or some such thing.

Being idealistic and making yourself believe that money isn't important is nice when you are young. Don't forget that you have, and will have in the future, a responsibility to others around you. I would listen to your father and have a fall back option. The more I get into Academia the more I realize its almost the same as moving to Hollywood, waiting tables and hoping to be an actor. And if you believe that Academia is somehow a safe haven, free from biases and other personal agendas, you have a rough road ahead...it is not always that the better/smarter/whatever guy becomes more successful. Science and Academia is riddled with, much like any other profession, political agendas and other such nonsense.

Also keep in mind that people like Feynman, Einstein, Pauli et al were very special people. They were successful for any number of reasons, hard work, natural intelligence/curiosity and even a bit of luck. For every Feynman there were 100 others who you may never hear about who spent a good portion of their lives' bouncing around trying to make things happen. You should prepare for the possibility that you will be one of the 100.

I guess my take-away is that you need to hope for the best but be prepared for the worst. My advice is to listen to those older than you, they may seem like they don't know anything but, trust me, they have been through a lot that you have yet to face.
 
  • #19
Yanick said:
One thing to keep in mind regarding money is simply that saying you don't care about money is an extremely idealistic and unrealistic point of view. I once shared this same point of view but as the years roll on, it slowly dawns on you that money is very important. I don't mean being greedy and trying to make millions, that's a whole 'nother story. I mean earning a decent living to support yourself and your family. As time goes by you will have responsibilities to many other people besides yourself.

I was once idealistic and kept saying that I don't care about money. Well, you know what? I'm married now, and we are thinking about kids. Trying doing that on 30k/year, working 12-14+ hour days and moving to a new city every year or two when the PI loses his grant money or some such thing.

Being idealistic and making yourself believe that money isn't important is nice when you are young. Don't forget that you have, and will have in the future, a responsibility to others around you. I would listen to your father and have a fall back option. The more I get into Academia the more I realize its almost the same as moving to Hollywood, waiting tables and hoping to be an actor.

Also keep in mind that people like Feynman, Einstein, Pauli et al were very special people. They were successful for any number of reasons, hard work, natural intelligence/curiosity and even a bit of luck. For every Feynman there were 100 others who you may never hear about who spent a good portion of their lives' bouncing around trying to make things happen. You should prepare for the possibility that you will be one of the 100.

I guess my take-away is that you need to hope for the best but be prepared for the worst. My advice is to listen to those older than you, they may seem like they don't know anything but, trust me, they have been through a lot that you have yet to face.

Yanick Thanks for long and very inclusive reply , It shed light on a lot of things and clarified a lot of doubts , at the moment a friend of mine and I are making money from a our website through google adsense and I know this won't last for long but I am trying to find an easy way out , maybe what I am doing is ridiculous but if it works and I am able to make this a stable income source then great , keep note that I am not trying to be a millionaire or whatnot but I've thought things through and hence decided to make money (solely to pay for tuition fees and other expenses) ... I will take your reply into consideration but I was slightly averse to the fact that I should take a engineering course alongside solely to act as a fallback plan. I know I am young and ambitious and quite unrealistic at times but If I am able to find an alternative stable source , would taking an engineering course be necessary? and is it solely recommended incase things don't work out the way I want them to be? and when I say I don't care about money , what I mean is , I am not solely going to make a decision based on how much income I generate from doing a certain thing , but that I will give my interest and passion more priority. By the way this website I own generates quite a bit of income (7000$ per month) Through ad revenues ... But let's hope I find a way out.. I was simply averse to the idea of having to become an engineer to make money! Please respond to this as I await for your lenghty and inclusive feedback.
 
  • #20
From the above discussion, does that mean an engineering degree is of no use for a theoretical physicist? And people just do it for money earning purpose? Please tell the truth
 
  • #21
DrPhoton said:
By the way this website I own generates quite a bit of income (7000$ per month) Through ad revenues ...

Is that right? Well, the answer, then, my friend is simple. Buy a plot of land and build your own perimeter institute. Then you can live in your own quantum theoretical daydream because obviously money is not a concern. Why is this discussion even happening?

Just for fun, though, let's pretend you're not actually pulling in 7K a month from one of your high school hobbies and then analyze your queries...

alright so I have gist of what I am to do and what not to do but once again I shall ask you whether or not I should major in a certain engineering field alongside physics? but that would mean not majoring math (which I am averse to )..

From what I gather, this is the real question the OP seems to ask over and over and is getting no response on. My first thought is, why would you think for a second that, by double majoring in physics and engineering, you are not by necessity going to be taking a large load of mathematics classes. Do you really need more? Second of all, there are more benefits to taking engineering other than the financial fallback option. Paul Dirac started out in engineering for very much the same reason you find yourself in. He attributed the skills he learned as an engineer to helping him formulate his groudbreaking work in quantum mechanics. I suggest you read "the strangest man" by Farmelo. You may find that engineering provides a different perspective on your theorizing, a sense of grounding of those concepts. Who knows?
 
  • #22
Viru.universe said:
From the above discussion, does that mean an engineering degree is of no use for a theoretical physicist? And people just do it for money earning purpose? Please tell the truth

Most of the students go for Engineering for the money, at least that's what I have seen.
 
  • #23
DiracPool said:
Is that right? Well, the answer, then, my friend is simple. Buy a plot of land and build your own perimeter institute. Then you can live in your own quantum theoretical daydream because obviously money is not a concern. Why is this discussion even happening?

Just for fun, though, let's pretend you're not actually pulling in 7K a month from one of your high school hobbies and then analyze your queries...



From what I gather, this is the real question the OP seems to ask over and over and is getting no response on. My first thought is, why would you think for a second that, by double majoring in physics and engineering, you are not by necessity going to be taking a large load of mathematics classes. Do you really need more? Second of all, there are more benefits to taking engineering other than the financial fallback option. Paul Dirac started out in engineering for very much the same reason you find yourself in. He attributed the skills he learned as an engineer to helping him formulate his groudbreaking work in quantum mechanics. I suggest you read "the strangest man" by Farmelo. You may find that engineering provides a different perspective on your theorizing, a sense of grounding of those concepts. Who knows?

Hmmm Ill definitely check it out.. Thank you all so much you have clarified my misconceptions and beaten me back on track
 
  • #24
Answer:

1. Of course it has...e.g. Experiments cannot be done without theorists behind (results need to be explained by theorists). Basically it can be but what I mean is that results need a sound theory/model to back on to...(Base from personal experience, experimentalists need the help of theorists especially when there are phenomena observed that cannot be explained from existing theories)

2. The answer lies in you, whether you want to go to academe or industry or other fields... Learning the rigors (mathematics and physics) of QFT provides you an excellent training in analysis and problem-solving needless to say the practical applications it has for us (Quantum information, ultra-cold regimes and others)...

3. Who knows... What's exciting right now is that theoretical physics is not exclusive for physics alone.. It has "invaded" other fields such as finance, economics, neuroscience, biology and an infinite list of other fields (caution: infinite used here is exaggerated).

4. the_wolfman has provided you the link...

We shared the "same" experience, I, wanting to study physics and being interested to the theoretical side (QFT, GR, LQG, string theories and the like) and then here comes my family who wanted me to take non-physics programs (Philippines, the majority, isn't into Physics, ergo, they don't have any idea what Physics can offer you)... Currently I am in my undergraduate senior year, things changed, and I am working in CFD right now... My advise is this, your dad is right...get engineering...

Reality is hard... You need to feed yourself and in case, your family. Like QM, the future has possibilities. You don't know what it holds for you...

Don't worry, mathematics can be learned by yourself (if you're good and besides, you can always approach any professors in the field). Engineering, too but you cannot always work on sophisticated and expensive tools used in engineering labs... and you get a gist of what is happening in the real world, no, real nature... Furthermore, engineering training provides you a different perspective.. I know a lot of physicists who were trained as engineers before they became theorists... Trust me, if you're really passionate about Science (in general), you'll do engineering just fine...
 
  • #25
You could also do computer science, which has great employment prospects but can also be studied in a theoretical context. A rapidly expanding field in theoretical physics is quantum computing and information theory. There is a lot of funding in this area, in fact there is a lot of research being done at places like Microsoft station Q and IBM.
 
  • #26
Paul Erdos life style for the win! I pay my way through college with money I make from research positions and competitions, I live out of two brief cases, and I sleep on my friends floor. This summer I am going to an REU with the Princton Plasma Physics Laboratory. There is a passage from the Daodejing that I really like: "If you want to be given everything, then let everything go". Happy trails mi amigo! :)
 

What is the future of theoretical physics?

The future of theoretical physics is constantly evolving and is difficult to predict. However, many scientists believe that there will be continued advancements in areas such as quantum mechanics, string theory, and cosmology. Theoretical physicists will also continue to work towards unifying the fundamental forces of nature.

What is the role of theoretical physics in society?

Theoretical physics plays a crucial role in our understanding of the universe and the laws that govern it. It has led to many technological advancements and has also helped us understand complex phenomena such as black holes and the origin of the universe. Theoretical physics also has practical applications in fields such as engineering, medicine, and computing.

What are the current challenges in theoretical physics?

Some of the current challenges in theoretical physics include finding a theory that unifies all the fundamental forces of nature, understanding the nature of dark matter and dark energy, and reconciling the theories of quantum mechanics and general relativity. There are also ongoing debates about the validity of certain theories, such as string theory.

How will advancements in technology impact theoretical physics?

Advancements in technology, such as the development of more powerful computers and particle accelerators, will greatly impact the future of theoretical physics. These advancements will allow scientists to conduct more complex experiments and simulations, leading to a deeper understanding of the universe and potentially new theories and discoveries.

What is the importance of collaboration in theoretical physics?

Collaboration is crucial in theoretical physics as it allows scientists to share ideas, knowledge, and resources. It also allows for different perspectives and approaches to solving complex problems. Many breakthroughs in theoretical physics have been the result of collaborative efforts between scientists from different disciplines and institutions.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
639
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • STEM Career Guidance
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
5
Views
659
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top