Is Omniscience and Time Paradox a Logical Fallacy?

In summary, the omniscient being in this scenario predicts that the person will choose the opposite pill to the one he/she was originally offered, but still has free will.
  • #1
mogthew
3
0
I was pondering an interesting situation the other day, and am interested to hear others thoughts on the issue.

There is a room, inside the room is the hypothetical god (Omniscient and omnipotent in this situation). A person enters the room, and sits down. God offers the person a blue pill and a red pill :P. Before the person entered the room he/she decided that he/she would pick the opposite colour to what the omniscient being said.

The person asks the omniscient being what colour pill he/she will choose, and the being has to respond truthfully either 'red' or 'blue'.

Obviously no matter what the omniscient being says, the person will choose the opposite to that, meaning that the being was wrong, meaning that an omnipotent being cannot do something as simple as telling you what colour pill you will choose (in this situation)

Does that mean its logically fallacious to be omniscient and see the future? And does it also present that the notion that free will is absolute (unhinderable by forces known or unknown)?

Interested to hear what you guys think.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Of course the omniscent "God in a room" knew what colour He was going to say the person would choose and consequently or otherwise knew what colour the person would choose. His omniscence is not lost, but even God doesn't have free will that's all :tongue2:
 
  • #3
Just because omnigod knows what colour you are going to choose does not mean you don't have free will.

Your free will is only thwarted when omnigod chooses the colour for you.
 
  • #4
I was only trying to say that omnigod knew what colour He was going to choose, but still had no free will himself. All this is hypothesis of course.

Clearly, in the OP's situation there cannot arise a question of refuting omniscence or supporting free will. The argument does not deal with the fact whether it is the omnigod that decides which colour the person chooses, only then can an issue of freewill come into the picture as baywax rightly pointed out.
 
  • #5
The omnigod knows that the person will choose the opposite pill as the one he suggests, so omnigod is making the decision. If he wants the person to take the red pill, he suggests blue.
 
  • #6
PIT2 said:
The omnigod knows that the person will choose the opposite pill as the one he suggests, so omnigod is making the decision. If he wants the person to take the red pill, he suggests blue.

But then he has not answered truthfully. If the omnigod is trully an omnigod, and has to answer truthfully it cannot answer correctly in this hypothesis.

BTW the omnigod does not choose the colour for the person, it only says what colour the person will choose.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
If the prediction of an oracle about a system is known by such system, then the oracle becomes part of it, and is no longer an oracle for it.
 
  • #8
PIT2 said:
The omnigod knows that the person will choose the opposite pill as the one he suggests, so omnigod is making the decision. If he wants the person to take the red pill, he suggests blue.

Do omnigods have to sink to the depths of using reverse psychology?!:rofl:
 
  • #9
mogthew said:
and the being has to respond truthfully either 'red' or 'blue'.

What does responding truthfully have to do with omniscience?
 
  • #10
Gods answer:

You will choose <psi| H |psi>...
where H = operator defining the physical act of choosing a color
and |psi> = (1/2)^(1/2) * ( |BLUE, RED> - |RED, BLUE> )

If you're wondering why God prefers singlets to triplets... my answer is Occam's razor.
 

1. What is omniscience?

Omniscience refers to the ability to know everything, including all past, present, and future events and knowledge.

2. Is omniscience possible?

This is a philosophical question that has been debated for centuries. Some argue that omniscience is possible for a divine being, while others believe it is not possible for any being, including a deity.

3. What is a time paradox?

A time paradox is a paradoxical situation that arises when events or actions in the past contradict or interfere with events or actions in the future. It suggests that time travel may be possible, but it would create logical contradictions.

4. Can an omniscient being create a time paradox?

This is a subject of debate and speculation. Some argue that an omniscient being would be able to foresee all potential consequences of their actions and therefore would not create a time paradox. Others argue that the concept of a time paradox is beyond human understanding and cannot be applied to an omniscient being.

5. How does the concept of omniscience relate to the theory of time?

Omniscience and the theory of time are closely related, as the concept of knowing everything would also include knowledge of all past, present, and future events. The idea of omniscience also brings up questions about the nature of time and whether it is linear or if all events are predetermined.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
886
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
3
Replies
102
Views
10K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
6K
Back
Top