158 in GRE quant should I just give up on life

In summary: Exactly. Deriving from first principles would be a waste of time and if...I would recommend you retake the GRE with this strategy in mind. He said memorize and understand. On these tests you do not have time to re-derive equations from scratch. You have to not only know all the equations, but understand how to use them to succeed.I took the GRE with a similar approach and have done very well. The point of exams is to test and reinforce your understanding skills - not memorizing skills.
  • #1
Hercuflea
596
49
I spent a whole year taking practice tests and I took an entire princeton review course. I have studied intermittently for the last 4 months. I memorized the entire formula sheet from the kaplan math book and more and maybe used 2 of the formulas on the test. I took 4 practice tests and scored a 165 in quant on the highest one...but now I took the real GRE and got a 158 which was the score I got on the first time I ever took a practice test! All that time studying was for nothing. I feel so depressed. I am a math major. There's no reason why I shouldn't score a 170 on quant. I don't understand why I can do all of this advanced math and plasma physics with a 3.8 gpa but I can't get a good score on a middle school math test. My resume is otherwise impeccable but no matter what I do I always screw up on the GRE because there isn't enough time to solve everything.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Physics GRE is more important. You may have had test jitters.
 
  • #3
I was going to say it is down to mistakes. If you know how to solve the problems, it'll be down to mistakes made in solving them, or wrong guesses sometimes, or misreading the question, or arithmetic errors, or not putting the answer in the correct form. The answer might need to be converted somehow; if you forget that, the answer is wrong.

But you also mention that there wasn't enough time. Which means you might have been answering too many questions. Sometimes it is quicker to eliminate the wrong answers than to calculate the right answer. In a sense, you only have to do enough calculation to eliminate all the other answers. But this is also dangerous because you are less likely to notice a mistake if you aren't doing the whole calculation. You won't get numbers that don't look right.

So in that sense, it is a combination of conceptual understanding and finding the weakness in each question. Is the weakness the fact that most of the given answers are easily shown to be incorrect? Is the weakness that a formula I know will lead directly to the answer? Or is that a trick?

Another thing to consider is that practice tests are never as difficult as the real test.
 
  • #4
The key problem is that you said you memorized formulas. The key to physics is understanding. You won't be able to solve problems requiring understanding will not be solved by mere memorizing.
 
  • #5
Thanks...at least the engineering schools I am applying to have said that the GRE is the last thing they care about in an application. I've got good recs and research experience. Not sure if I want to take it again.
 
  • #6
Shivam3013 said:
The key problem is that you said you memorized formulas. The key to physics is understanding. You won't be able to solve problems requiring understanding will not be solved by mere memorizing.

Thats naive.

Try that for the physics gre. These are timed exams which means you will need to memorize and understand.
 
  • #7
jesse73 said:
Thats naive.

Try that for the physics gre. These are timed exams which means you will need to memorize and understand.

I also find it more efficient to learn the concept otherwise blindly plugging numbers into an equation that you don't understand is a recipe for failure
 
  • #8
caldweab said:
I also find it more efficient to learn the concept otherwise blindly plugging numbers into an equation that you don't understand is a recipe for failure

He said memorize and understand. On these tests you do not have time to re-derive equations from scratch. You have to not only know all the equations, but understand how to use them to succeed.
 
  • #9
jesse73 said:
Thats naive.

Try that for the physics gre. These are timed exams which means you will need to memorize and understand.
I have taken the GRE with a similar approach and have done very well. The point of exams is to test and reinforce your understanding skills - not memorizing skills.
 
  • #10
I think taking it again would almost certainly give a better result. As I said, I think it is down to mistakes. Hercuflea, if it will give you more confidence, perhaps retake it for that reason only.
 
  • #11
Shivam3013 said:
I have taken the GRE with a similar approach and have done very well. The point of exams is to test and reinforce your understanding skills - not memorizing skills.

Neither are mutually exclusive.
 
  • #12
Sentin3l said:
He said memorize and understand. On these tests you do not have time to re-derive equations from scratch. You have to not only know all the equations, but understand how to use them to succeed.

Exactly. Deriving from first principles would be a waste of time and if we were referring to the physics GRE it would be impossible ( you are going to make qft calculations and prove conservation of lepton numbers)
 
  • #13
hey. i tutor math at my university, and while i have graduated, i taught gre/gmat classes (both).

first, when are you applying to grad school? if you have time you should try tutoring. for me, i believe tutoring for over three years steeled my gre score (i can finish with about 10 minutes to spare, getting every question). doing math every day and teaching it solidifies understanding and makes you impeccable with mental math (as previously mentioned, youre probably making dumb errors)

second, as previously stated, take the specific gre, as most universities require you take both! you may do better??

lastly, NO, youre not out of the game. gre is a graduate school requirement, and perhaps the department only requires you meet the minimum? but if youve done well in upperdivision RELEVANT courses youre probably fine, depending on where you want to go.

hope this helps
 
  • #14
Thanks. I ran out of time in the first section which determines more of your score, with 1 minute left and 5 questions to go I had to christmas tree and I wasn't even able to click on the last one. I exceeded the "minimum" (I think its a soft minimum) for my program in verbal and writing but not math. Ironically I'm a math major. I am applying to top 10 engineering schools, and I looked at this site http://magoosh.com/gre/2013/gre-scores-for-engineering-programs/ which shows average GRE scores. I am about 4 points below average...not sure if I should retake since my GPA is stellar and I have undergrad research experience with my intended doctoral advisor and resume boosters.
 
  • #15
My first time around the general exam I got 150 on the quant. Second time -a year later- I actually did worse, 149, but actually improved substantially on the verbal (studying vocabulary paid off). Got the exact same score on the analytical writing on both exams, despite having radically changed my approach, I think grading in this section is pretty arbitrary.

If it is of any consolation, I shared the (subject gre) testing room with an Oxford math major who said he did even worse than I did on the quant section. You can probably do definite integration of most transcendental functions in your head, I know I can do it faster than an "ugly" numerical long division to anything beyond 2 significant digits without going for "spherical cow" approximations.

I don't know what this means, probably not a whole lot if you've got all the coursework done. If you've made it through the bulk of classical and modern physics coursework, it certainly doesn't mean we're unable to do geometry, basic stats, combinatorics and word problems, but I happen to be terribly slow on the GRE and having to read problems off of a screen instead of paper is an added annoyance for me, as I usually like to make a few scribbles immediately below a word problem as I read it or immediately start drawing on geometric figures. I am very prone to copying down a number wrong from the screen, maybe you are too.

The only thing I can say is: speed up and sharpen up your mental arithmetic and read problems carefully. Also try hard to keep your hands off the pencil. The GRE only tests your ability to take the GRE (with the time constraint being the main hinderance).
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Thanks lavabug...question, did you go to graduate school with that score or did you retake the exam to get a better score?
 
  • #17
I got waitlisted at a top 20 ish if ranking means anything to you... but I didn't get in. I am applying to around a 5-fold (compared to last time) number institutions this time around. Haven't been able to do much else other than study for the PGRE to do something to improve my chances (no luck with jobs...). Strongly considering spending a good 350€ on taking the general GRE again a third time just to get a better quant score (the extra cost is lodging + transport, I live in a very isolated region).
 
  • #18
Hercuflea said:
I ran out of time in the first section which determines more of your score, with 1 minute left and 5 questions to go I had to christmas tree and I wasn't even able to click on the last one.
no prob. a quick point, you say you had to "Christmas tree" and by that i assume you refer to guessing abcdedcba in a zigzag way? from a mathematical perspective, this is ill-advised. when guessing in the fashion you have, you limit yourself to 20% per question, and likely you will miss every question. however, if you guess, say, B on each remaining question, you will notice the odds of at least one question being B increase, and perhaps you walk away with a correct answer.

hope this helps
 
  • #19
lastly, and if this has been said I am sorry for not reading, but email the school. all one email does is shown your concern about being accepted. we can all speculate, but the only ones who really know are the admittance council
 
  • #20
joshmccraney said:
lastly, and if this has been said I am sorry for not reading, but email the school. all one email does is shown your concern about being accepted. we can all speculate, but the only ones who really know are the admittance council

Thanks for the advice. When I say "Christmas Tree" I mean that I just randomly picked answers in no particular pattern because I had one minute left and about 6 questions to go. I actually have already done undergraduate research with the advisor I am wanting for my Ph.D. at my top school choice. However, I am worried that they will change their mind about me once they realize I am a mathematics major who scored a 158 on the GRE math :(... I may take it again, but I'm bad at time-restricted tests and worried I'll screw up again.
 

1. What is a good score for the GRE quant section?

A good score for the GRE quant section varies depending on the program you are applying to. Generally, a score of 158 is considered above average and can be competitive for many graduate programs.

2. Should I retake the GRE if I scored 158 in quant?

It ultimately depends on the program you are applying to and their specific requirements. Some programs may have a higher minimum score for the quant section, in which case it may be beneficial to retake the test. However, if your overall score is strong and meets the program's requirements, you may not need to retake the GRE.

3. Will a 158 in quant significantly impact my chances of getting into graduate school?

While the GRE score is an important factor in the admissions process, it is not the only factor. Admissions committees also consider your undergraduate GPA, letters of recommendation, personal statement, and other qualifications. A 158 in quant may not have a significant impact on your overall application if your other qualifications are strong.

4. How can I improve my score in the GRE quant section?

There are many ways to improve your score in the GRE quant section, such as practicing with official GRE materials, taking a prep course, and studying with a tutor. It is also important to familiarize yourself with the format and types of questions on the GRE and to develop a study plan that works best for you.

5. Is a low score in the quant section a reflection of my abilities as a scientist?

No, a low score in the quant section does not necessarily reflect your abilities as a scientist. The GRE quant section tests mathematical and analytical skills that may not necessarily be directly related to your field of study. It is important to remember that the GRE is just one aspect of your graduate school application and does not define your potential as a scientist.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
997
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top