is the system linear if there is an independant gravity term


by silentwf
Tags: gravity, independant, linear, term
silentwf
silentwf is offline
#1
Sep30-13, 12:42 PM
P: 37
Like the topic,if in my system derivation, there is an independent gravitational force independent of the state variable, is my system linear? I believe it is not but my instructor is telling is it is. I'm thinking that if there is is an extra gravitational term,the output of the system does not obey f(ax ) = af(x).
Phys.Org News Partner Engineering news on Phys.org
A smart prosthetic knee with in-vivo diagnoses
Old tires become material for new and improved roads
Students take clot-buster for a spin
mfb
mfb is online now
#2
Sep30-13, 06:21 PM
Mentor
P: 10,846
Linear in which variable?
Can you add some context to your question?
silentwf
silentwf is offline
#3
Sep30-13, 08:25 PM
P: 37
Um, could you explain further by which variable you mean? I think I have the misconception that if there are any terms in the equation of motion not associated to input or output, the system is nonlinear, since the equation itself, when input or output is multiplied by a constant, does not follow the law of superposition.

mfb
mfb is online now
#4
Oct1-13, 08:53 AM
Mentor
P: 10,846

is the system linear if there is an independant gravity term


Simple example: ##y=a^2x##

y and x have a linear relationship - if you multiply x by 2, y gets multiplied by 2 as well. The system is linear, if you consider "a" as a constant parameter, and look at x and y. You can add multiple solutions as superpositions.

y and a do not have a linear relationship - if you multiply a by 2, y gets multiplied by 4. The system is not linear, if you consider "x" as a constant parameter, and look at a and y. You cannot add multiple solutions as superposition.
silentwf
silentwf is offline
#5
Oct1-13, 10:43 AM
P: 37
Okay, um then I should make it something like this: if my system is equation is something like:
[itex] f - mg - u = 0 [/itex] where f is the input and u is a disturbance (both are functions of time).
having a scalar multiple of my force would not increase the system's response in a linear way. does this mean that this system is not linear?
[itex] f(a*t) - mg - u(t) = 0 [/itex]
mfb
mfb is online now
#6
Oct1-13, 01:31 PM
Mentor
P: 10,846
A scalar multiple of the force would not lead to a scalar multiple of the mass (if u does not scale in the same way), indeed.
silentwf
silentwf is offline
#7
Oct1-13, 02:57 PM
P: 37
So the system is non-linear? It's kind of strange to think of it in this way, so I'm not really sure.
mfb
mfb is online now
#8
Oct1-13, 03:07 PM
Mentor
P: 10,846
I think it is non-linear with the interpretation as in post #5.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
system of linear equation in term of column vector Linear & Abstract Algebra 5
gravity force term Introductory Physics Homework 4
Gravity term in simple 2 DOF quarter car model? Automotive Engineering 3
What energy term determines gravity in GR? Special & General Relativity 7
Gravity independant of mass? General Physics 4