Is NASA Really Saying Goodbye to the Space Shuttle Program?

[Universe_Man]

I heard somewhere that NASA is going back to the old days with space capsules and such because of the expense and other problems that the space shuttle is having. is that true?

 

[RainmanAero]

Universe_Man,

I heard somewhere that NASA is going back to the old days with space capsules and such because of the expense and other problems that the space shuttle is having. is that true?

It is true. I am an engineer working on one of the two larger industry teams that is bidding on the Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV). NASA is the one dictating what the shape (Outer Mold Line or OML) is going to be. But it is going to be a much larger capsule than Apollo.

There is little doubt that a capsule has a higher factor of safety in bringing a human home to the Earth over a flyable shuttle. But the flyable shuttle offers a benefit that the capsule does not: High Lift-to-Drag ratio, which equates to a greater ability to provide lateral (crossrange) maneuvers. What all this mumbo jumbo equates to is an increased FLEXIBILITY of available places to land.

You have to be a lot more precise with trajectory predictions when you use a (ballistic) capsule because you have less aerodynamic capability to correct trajectory errors.

Make sense?
Rainman

 

[NatSusan]

It is true that NASA has retired the space shuttle program and is moving towards using capsules again for space travel. The decision was made due to the high cost and safety concerns of the space shuttle. Capsules are a more cost-effective and reliable option for space travel. However, NASA is also investing in new technologies and spacecrafts for future missions.