Why doesn't anybody make 1.5V rechargeables?

  • Thread starter gnome
  • Start date
In summary, rechargeable "AA" batteries are all rated at 1.2 V, but 1.5 V cells are available if the electrodes are made from different materials. The gold/lithium battery would be expensive to make and would have to be recharged, which would be more trouble than it's worth.
  • #1
gnome
1,041
1
It appears that all rechargeable "AA" batteries are rated at 1.2V.

Why doesn't anybody make 1.5V rechargeables?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
gnome said:
It appears that all rechargeable "AA" batteries are rated at 1.2V.

Why doesn't anybody make 1.5V rechargeables?
The voltage supplied by an electrochemical cell has to do with the electrodes that are used to make the battery (as well as a few other conditions, such as concentrations of ions, etc). To make a 1.5 V battery, they'd probably have to make the battery out of some other materials, materials that may be expensive, impractical, etc.

Check this page out. If they could make a cell using Chlorine gas and Zinc metal, they could have a cell which produced 1.359V - (-0.763V) = 2.122V, much more powerful than your regular battery, but how could they make a batter where one electrode was Chlorine gas? So, I'm guessing your typical household battery uses two electrodes that produce a decent voltage, but are easy to make a battery out of, and are not rare or expensive, stuff like that.
 
  • #3
I use energizer AA Hi Energy Lithium cells for the clock and memory functions in one of my shortwave radios. The voltage of each battery is 1.5 yet they are not rechargable. There are, however, Lithium-ion? rechargeable batteries for camcorders available, but I believe there may be a difference between this type and my AA batteries as I seem to recall having researched the matter once but cannot remember what I had found out. Different materials will yield different voltages and I suppose the materials most economically suitable/available just happen to leave many of us longing for that additional 0.3 volts.
 
  • #4
If they made a lithium (+3.02) gold (-1.68) battery each cell would produce 4.7 volts! They would also completely eliminate any problem with recycling.
 
  • #5
Gold is expensive, though.
 
  • #6
ElementFire said:
Gold is expensive, though.
That's why it would solve the recycling problem. The recycling problem with batteries is that no one recycles them: all that's in a used battery is a lot of cheap chemicals and elements. It isn't worth the work to recycle them. People throw them away. People drop them on the street.

The gold/lithium battery would be worth recycling. The gold electrode being the stable element, would undergo no chemical change during the life of the battery. A discharged battery would be much too expensive to throw away, so recycling operations would spring up everywhere.

The first gold/lithium battery you buy would be quite expensive. They could enginneer them to be rechargable, and when they wore out their rechargability you could turn them in and get a new one at a much reduced price.

Not that I think any of this would ever happen :-).
 
  • #7
It's a good idea on paper, but people may not want to use them as batteries. They'll find some technique to liquefy the gold in the battery and they'll make jewelry out of them (I'm guessing a necklace made of gold will be more expensive than one battery). :)
 
  • #8
ElementFire said:
It's a good idea on paper, but people may not want to use them as batteries. They'll find some technique to liquefy the gold in the battery and they'll make jewelry out of them (I'm guessing a necklace made of gold will be more expensive than one battery). :)
My thinking was that the gold would be electrodeposited on a porous element just like the platinum in a catalytic converter. This would primariy be to get the most surface area out of the least amount of gold, but it would also deter people from trying to do what you pointed out would inevitably happen: people stealing other people's batteries thinking they can melt down the gold. This way, it would take an industrial process to recover the gold from the porous element, involving nitric and hydrochloric acid, and should really end up being more trouble than it's worth. No one steals catalytic converters and tries to reclaim the platinum, despite the fact it is worth much more than the same weight of gold. Too much trouble for too little platinum.
 
  • #9
Battery types

In case you were wondering, 1.2 V rechargeable batteries are usually either nickel-cadmium (cadmium and nickel oxyhydroxide electrodes) or nickel-metal hydride (some alloy usually with a rare-earth metal and nickel oxyhydroxide electrodes). 1.5 V cells are called alkaline because the electrolyte is an alkaline paste (potassium hydroxide), but the electrodes are zinc and magnesium dioxide (incidentally the first electrodes ever to be used were zinc and copper).
 
  • #10
My thinking was that the gold would be electrodeposited on a porous element just like the platinum in a catalytic converter. This would primariy be to get the most surface area out of the least amount of gold, but it would also deter people from trying to do what you pointed out would inevitably happen: people stealing other people's batteries thinking they can melt down the gold. This way, it would take an industrial process to recover the gold from the porous element, involving nitric and hydrochloric acid, and should really end up being more trouble than it's worth. No one steals catalytic converters and tries to reclaim the platinum, despite the fact it is worth much more than the same weight of gold. Too much trouble for too little platinum.

That would make it a plausible idea. Might happen someday. :)
 

1. Why are most rechargeable batteries only 1.2V and not 1.5V?

This is because traditional rechargeable batteries, also known as nickel-metal hydride (NiMH) batteries, have a lower nominal voltage of 1.2V compared to non-rechargeable alkaline batteries which have a nominal voltage of 1.5V. This is due to the different chemical reactions that occur within these two types of batteries.

2. Can't manufacturers increase the voltage of rechargeable batteries to 1.5V?

Technically, it is possible to increase the voltage of rechargeable batteries to 1.5V. However, this would require a different type of battery chemistry, such as lithium-ion, which has a nominal voltage of 3.6V. These types of batteries are typically used in electronic devices such as smartphones and laptops, and are not commonly used in household items like AA or AAA batteries.

3. Are there any 1.5V rechargeable batteries available in the market?

There are some 1.5V rechargeable batteries available, but they are not common and are usually more expensive. These batteries use a different type of chemistry, such as nickel-zinc or nickel-cadmium, which have a higher nominal voltage of 1.5V. However, these batteries are not as widely used as NiMH batteries due to their lower energy density and shorter lifespan.

4. Why would someone want to use 1.5V rechargeable batteries?

One of the main reasons someone might want to use 1.5V rechargeable batteries is for devices that require a higher voltage, such as high-powered flashlights or cameras. These batteries can provide a longer runtime and higher performance compared to traditional 1.2V rechargeable batteries. However, for most household devices, the difference in voltage is not significant enough to justify the higher cost of 1.5V rechargeable batteries.

5. Will there ever be a 1.5V rechargeable battery with the same capacity as a 1.2V battery?

It is unlikely that there will be a 1.5V rechargeable battery with the same capacity as a 1.2V battery using the same type of chemistry. The higher voltage would require a different type of battery chemistry, which may not be as efficient as NiMH batteries in terms of energy density and lifespan. However, advancements in battery technology may lead to the development of more efficient 1.5V rechargeable batteries in the future.

Similar threads

  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
10
Views
793
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
933
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
4K
Back
Top