Proof: Showing A is Similar to Upper-Triangular Matrix

In summary, to show that A is similar to an upper-triangular matrix, we can use the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem and the fact that \lambda is an eigenvalue of A with multiplicity n. By considering the matrix [x1,...,xn], where Axk = \lambda xk for k = 1,2,...,n, we can see that A is indeed similar to an upper-triangular matrix.
  • #1
ksinclair13
99
0

Homework Statement


Let A be an n x n matrix and suppose that the characteristic polynomial of A is
p(t) = ([tex]\lambda[/tex]-t)[tex]^{n}[/tex] for some fixed [tex]\lambda[/tex] [tex]\in[/tex] R. Show that A is similar to an upper-triangular matrix. Do this by finding a basis with the following property: {x1,...,xn} is a basis of R[tex]^{n}[/tex] such that Axk [tex]\in[/tex] span{x1,...,xk} for k = 1,2,...,n. You may find the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem helpful.


Homework Equations


p(t) = det(A-t*I) = ([tex]\lambda[/tex]-t)[tex]^{n}[/tex]
p(A) = 0 (Cayley-Hamilton Theorem)


The Attempt at a Solution


I have already done the following problem:
Let A be an n x n matrix and let {x1,...,xn} be a basis of R[tex]^{n}[/tex]. Show that the matrix of the linear transformation associated to A with respect to this basis is upper-triangular if and only if Axk [tex]\in[/tex] span{x1,...,xk} for k = 1,2,...,n.

I think the matrix [x1,...,xn] must itself be upper-triangular. Such a basis would not be difficult to find, however I don't understand how to connect this with the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem or the fact that [tex]\lambda[/tex] is an eigenvalue of A with multiplicity n. I also don't have any good ideas of how to go about the proof in general.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2




Hello!

To show that A is similar to an upper-triangular matrix, we need to find a basis with the property stated in the problem. We can approach this by using the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem, which states that p(A) = 0. This means that A satisfies its own characteristic polynomial.

Since p(t) = (\lambda-t)^{n}, we know that \lambda is an eigenvalue of A with multiplicity n. This means that there exists a basis {x1,...,xn} such that Axk = \lambda xk for k = 1,2,...,n. This is because the characteristic polynomial of A is the product of its eigenvalues, and in this case, all eigenvalues are equal to \lambda.

Now, let us consider the matrix [x1,...,xn]. Since Axk = \lambda xk for k = 1,2,...,n, we can see that the first column of this matrix will be [x1,0,0,...,0], the second column will be [0,x2,0,...,0], and so on. Therefore, this matrix is upper-triangular.

Furthermore, since Axk = \lambda xk for k = 1,2,...,n, we can see that Axk \in span{x1,...,xk}. This satisfies the property stated in the problem, and thus A is similar to an upper-triangular matrix.

I hope this helps! Let me know if you need any further clarification.
 

1. What is a similarity transformation?

A similarity transformation is a linear transformation that preserves the shape of an object, but may change its size and orientation. In terms of matrices, it is a transformation in which two matrices are considered similar if one can be obtained from the other by a combination of scaling, rotation, and reflection.

2. How do you prove that a matrix A is similar to an upper-triangular matrix?

To prove that a matrix A is similar to an upper-triangular matrix, you need to find a nonsingular matrix P such that P-1AP is an upper-triangular matrix. This can be done using the similarity transformation method, where you first find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of A, and then construct P using the eigenvectors as columns. P-1AP will then be an upper-triangular matrix with the eigenvalues of A on its diagonal.

3. Why is proving similarity to an upper-triangular matrix useful?

Proving similarity to an upper-triangular matrix can be useful because it simplifies many matrix operations. In an upper-triangular matrix, all the entries below the main diagonal are zero, making it easier to perform calculations like finding determinants, eigenvalues, and inverses. It also allows for a clearer understanding of the relationship between different matrices.

4. Can any matrix be similar to an upper-triangular matrix?

Yes, any square matrix can be similar to an upper-triangular matrix. This is because similarity is an equivalence relation, meaning it is reflexive (every matrix is similar to itself), symmetric (if A is similar to B, then B is similar to A), and transitive (if A is similar to B and B is similar to C, then A is similar to C). This means that you can always find a similarity transformation to transform any matrix into an upper-triangular matrix.

5. How is similarity to an upper-triangular matrix related to diagonalizability?

A matrix is diagonalizable if it is similar to a diagonal matrix, which is a special case of an upper-triangular matrix. Therefore, a matrix that is similar to an upper-triangular matrix is also diagonalizable. However, not all diagonalizable matrices are similar to an upper-triangular matrix. For example, a matrix may be diagonalizable but not have all its eigenvalues on the main diagonal.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
516
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top