Norm of operator vs. norm of its inverse

In summary, the statement \|T^{-1}\| = \frac{1}{\|T\|} does not always hold, even for finite-dimensional spaces. A counterexample is given by the matrix (2 0; 0 1) and its inverse, with norms 2 and 1 respectively. However, the inequality \|T^{-1}\| \geq \frac{1}{\|T\|} always holds for bounded operators. It is recommended to test statements in functional analysis in the case of finite dimensions first.
  • #1
AxiomOfChoice
533
1
Are there any circumstances under which we can conclude that, for an invertible, bounded linear operator T,

[tex]
\| T^{-1} \| = \frac{1}{\| T \|} ?
[/tex]

E.g., does this always hold if we know the inverse is bounded?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No, this doesn't even hold for finite-dimensional spaces! (i.e. for matrices).

Consider the matrix

[tex]\left(\begin{array}{cc} 2 & 0\\ 0 & 1\end{array}\right)[/tex].

The norm of this operator is 2. However, the inverse operator is

[tex]\left(\begin{array}{cc} 1/2 & 0\\ 0 & 1\end{array}\right)[/tex]

and this has norm 1.

However, you do have an inequality (for bounded operators of course): Since [tex]1=\|id\|=\|TT^{-1}\|\leq \|T\|\|T^{-1}\|[/tex], it follows that [tex]\frac{1}{\|T\|}\leq \|T^{-1}\|[/tex].
 
  • #3
Or simpler, the 1x1-matrix (a) has inverse (1/a), and these have norms a and 1/a, respectively :p

In general, it's good advice to test statements in functional analysis in the easy case of finite dimensions first.
 
  • #4
Landau said:
Or simpler, the 1x1-matrix (a) has inverse (1/a), and these have norms a and 1/a, respectively :p

In general, it's good advice to test statements in functional analysis in the easy case of finite dimensions first.

Good advice. Thanks to all of you :biggrin:
 

1. What is the "norm" of an operator?

The "norm" of an operator is a mathematical measure of its size or magnitude. It is typically represented by a positive number that indicates the "size" of the operator in relation to other operators.

2. How is the norm of an operator defined?

The norm of an operator can be defined in various ways, depending on the context and the type of operator. In general, it is defined as the maximum possible value that the operator can produce when applied to a given input.

3. What is the significance of the norm of an operator?

The norm of an operator is significant because it provides a way to measure the distance between two operators. It is also useful for determining the convergence of a sequence of operators and for understanding the behavior of operators in various mathematical operations.

4. How does the norm of an operator relate to its inverse?

The norm of an operator and the norm of its inverse are inversely related. This means that as the norm of an operator increases, the norm of its inverse decreases, and vice versa. This relationship is an important property of operators that is often used in mathematical analysis and applications.

5. Can the norm of an operator ever be equal to the norm of its inverse?

In general, the norm of an operator and the norm of its inverse can never be equal. However, there are some special cases where this can occur, such as when the operator is the identity operator or when the operator is unitary. In these cases, the norm of the operator and its inverse will be equal.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
2
Replies
43
Views
3K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
741
  • Calculus
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
567
  • Calculus
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top