PipBoy said:I don't really know much about Quantum Physics, but having just read an article about Quantum Tunneling, would this not mean that the force would simply go through the immovable object, assuming that it being unstoppable provides the atoms with sufficent energy to break the electronic barrriers of the immovable object?
The concept of "Unstoppable Force, Immovable Object" is a philosophical paradox that asks what would happen if an unstoppable force were to collide with an immovable object. It is a thought experiment that explores the limits of physical laws and the nature of infinity.
No, it is impossible for both an unstoppable force and an immovable object to exist in reality. This is because an unstoppable force, by definition, cannot be stopped, and an immovable object cannot be moved. The existence of both would violate the laws of physics.
An example of an unstoppable force could be a bullet fired from a gun, while an immovable object could be a concrete wall. In this scenario, the bullet would be unstoppable, but it would not be able to move the wall. Another example could be a hurricane (unstoppable force) hitting a mountain (immovable object).
While the concept of "Unstoppable Force, Immovable Object" is a popular thought experiment, it is not used in any scientific theories or experiments. It is purely a philosophical and hypothetical scenario that explores the boundaries of physical laws.
There is no definitive resolution to this paradox as it is a hypothetical scenario. Some argue that the immovable object would have to give in to the unstoppable force, while others argue that the unstoppable force would have to find a way around the immovable object. Ultimately, it remains a philosophical debate with no concrete answer.