Holographic projections onto the surface of a sphere

In summary, Leonard Susskind believes that everything within the boundary of a particular timeframe volume can be described equally well by the projection of each event onto the surface of a bubble. Supposed I picture the surface of the bubble as an irregularly shaped bubble, does this make the events within the boundary 3-dimensional?
  • #1
geordief
214
48
I was reading the Scientific American latest edition and it was claimed that everything within the boundary of a particular timeframe volume can be described equally well by the projection of each event onto the surface.
Is this accepted dogma?
Suppose I picture (apparently I can't but anyway...) the surface as an irregularly shaped bubble are the events within the boundary projecte onto the suface as entirely 2 dimensional or , if they are pancake shaped does that make them 3 -dimensional?
Apologies in advance for my clear ignorance of the subject and also if I have posted in the wrong forum
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Sounds like you're asking about AdS/CFT correspondence and the holographic principle. Take a look at this article http://www.sns.ias.edu/~malda/sciam-maldacena-3a.pdf, it might help provide some clarity.
 
  • #3
thanks
I'll take a look at that
 
  • #4
You can get an introduction here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdS/CFT

Holographic information is a favorite of Leonard Susskind...he has some interesting theories regarding information on black hole horizons...any horizons. For example, one can conjecture that if our universe is finite and bounded, the boundary contains all the information that we think of classically as contained within the inerior volume.

Susskind has some very interesting approaches in THE BLACK HOLE WAR where he describes he decades long arguments with Stephen Hawking on information loss in black holes...
a few of his explanations:

Today a standard concept in black hole physics is a stretched horizon which is a layer of hot microscopic degrees of freedom about one Planck length thick and a Planck length above the event horizon. Every so often a bit gets carried out in an evaporation process. This is Hawking radiation. A free falling observer sees empty space.

Everything inside a region of space can be described by information bits restricted to the boundary. The world is pixilated! The maximum number of bits of information that can fit in a region of space is equal to the number of Planck sized pixels that can be packed on the area boundary…a hologram. (304)

The question of where a [particular bit of information is located does not have a unique answer. Each successively larger boundary includes all the previous information until we come to the boundary of the universe or infinity..….ordinary Quantum mechanics makes an objects location slightly uncertain; the holographic principle means every time we seek the location of information on the hologram it’s always out at the next level!
 
  • #5
Naty1 said:
the holographic principle means every time we seek the location of information on the hologram it’s always out at the next level!
not to pretend that I have absorbed with the information in the replies to my post yet but that sounds somehow both familiar and reassuring...a bit like the Cheshire Cat.
 
  • #6
Those three paragraphs I posted were not precise quotes...I shortened ideas...so it's not like I have been studying such things for decades and understand all the implications...but one thing is for sure: the more we learn the less "reality" is what it appears.
 
  • #7
The Cheshire Cat appears and disappears when we start worrying about what an in falling observer experiences. But since an in falling observer cannot communicate what it is they observed after passing through the event horizon, it seems to me that we should spend not so much time worrying about it. Rather, IMVHO, we should consider what an in falling object looks like to a distant observer. Considering GR, an in falling object never makes it past the event horizon. Rather it's spread across the surface of the event horizon and red shifted into infinity. Thus, everything that "falls into a black hole" exists on the 2D (+t) surface, from the perspective of the distant observer.
 
  • #8
an example is a black hole, the overall entropy is counted by the amount of plank squares on it s surface (The surface of the event horizon) This shows that the information that tells you about the black hole is kept on the surface. What if this describes our universe, what if our universe's information is kept on a 2D surface at the edge of our universe. The information exchange that happens there describes what we do here :D
 
  • #9
I think I read that our own universe could be described on its outer suface if it was a black hole (unless I am misremembering -or if that was just one of the theories that allowed this).

So how would we know if our own universe was a black hole ? Are there any experiments that could have a bearing on this?
 

1. How does a holographic projection onto a sphere work?

A holographic projection onto a sphere involves using a special type of projector that projects an image onto a curved surface, such as a sphere. The image is created using interference patterns and appears to be three-dimensional, giving the illusion of a hologram.

2. What is the purpose of using a sphere for holographic projections?

A sphere is used for holographic projections because it allows for a more immersive and realistic experience. The curved surface of the sphere mimics the shape of objects in the real world, making the hologram appear more lifelike.

3. Can any image be projected onto a spherical surface?

Yes, any two-dimensional image can be projected onto a spherical surface. However, the image may need to be distorted or manipulated to fit the curved surface and appear correctly to the viewer.

4. How is the size of the holographic projection determined?

The size of the holographic projection onto a sphere can be determined by the size and shape of the sphere being used, as well as the distance between the projector and the sphere. Adjusting these factors can change the size of the projection.

5. Are there any limitations to holographic projections onto a sphere?

One limitation of holographic projections onto a sphere is the viewing angle. Depending on the position of the viewer, the hologram may appear distorted or incomplete. Additionally, the quality of the projection may be affected by lighting and the reflective properties of the sphere's surface.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Topology and Analysis
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
413
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
988
Back
Top