New Reply

Determinants of matrices greater than 3x3

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Aug10-12, 02:31 PM   #1
 
Blog Entries: 1

Determinants of matrices greater than 3x3


I am wondering how one would find a the determinant of a 4x4 or greater. This isn't an urgent question, just a curiosity.
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
mathematics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Mathematicians analyze social divisions using cell phone data
>> Can math models of gaming strategies be used to detect terrorism networks?
>> Mathematician proves there are infinitely many pairs of prime numbers less than 70 million units apart
Aug10-12, 05:26 PM   #3

Math 2012
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
That is "correct", and an interesting theoretical result, but it's a hopelessly inefficient way to calculate the determinant of a general matrix, because it takes of the order of n! operations for an n x n matrix.

A much more efficient way is to do row operations on the matrix which don't change the value of the determinant (or only multiply it by -1), but systematically change the matrix so that all the entries below the diagonal are zero. The determinant is then just the product of the diagonal terms. In the worst case, that takes about n3 operations. For a 10 x 10 matrix, n3 = 1,000 and n! = about 3.6 million, so one way is about 3600 times faster than the other!
Aug10-12, 05:36 PM   #4
 
Blog Entries: 1

Determinants of matrices greater than 3x3


Quote by AlephZero View Post
A much more efficient way is to do row operations on the matrix which don't change the value of the determinant (or only multiply it by -1), but systematically change the matrix so that all the entries below the diagonal are zero. The determinant is then just the product of the diagonal terms. In the worst case, that takes about n3 operations. For a 10 x 10 matrix, n3 = 1,000 and n! = about 3.6 million, so one way is about 3600 times faster than the other!
By chance, could you give an example of how to do row operations to find the determinant?
Aug10-12, 05:49 PM   #5
 
Quote by AlephZero View Post
That is "correct", and an interesting theoretical result, but it's a hopelessly inefficient way to calculate the determinant of a general matrix, because it takes of the order of n! operations for an n x n matrix.
Whenever I get to compute a det with n >= 3 MANUALLY, I use this method. Possibly because I remember it by heart. Doing arbitrary n dets most efficiently is a distinctly different matter.
Aug10-12, 05:57 PM   #6
 
Blog Entries: 1
Quote by voko View Post
Whenever I get to compute a det with n >= 3 MANUALLY, I use this method. Possibly because I remember it by heart. Doing arbitrary n dets most efficiently is a distinctly different matter.
At the moment, it is the ONLY method I have learned. (I am self-teaching myself Multidimensional Mathematics until classes start in 3 weeks).
Aug10-12, 06:54 PM   #7
 
Here's a good explanation of this method:
http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Class...Reduction.aspx
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Determinants of matrices greater than 3x3
Thread Forum Replies
history of matrices and determinants? Linear & Abstract Algebra 1
Vectors, Matrices and Determinants. Oh my. General Math 4
determinants and diagonalizable matrices Calculus & Beyond Homework 8
Have you done matrices and determinants? Academic Guidance 6
Stable matrices and their determinants Calculus & Beyond Homework 1