Iran Elections: Religious Hard-Liner Victory, Is Domino Effect at Work?

  • News
  • Thread starter vanesch
  • Start date
In summary, the US says the election was "flawed" and described Iran as "out of step" with regional trends towards democracy.
  • #1
vanesch
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
5,117
20
The elections put a religious hard-liner forward:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4621249.stm

I particularly like the quote:

The US said the election was "flawed" and described Iran as "out of step" with regional trends towards democracy.

Is this the domino effect at work ? :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
lol yah, this throws a monkey wrentch in everything...
 
  • #3
vanesch said:
The elections put a religious hard-liner forward:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4621249.stm

I particularly like the quote:



Is this the domino effect at work ? :biggrin:
Exactly. They elected a leader who is a religious hard-liner, just like the U.S.

Seriously, it isn't whether countries practice democracy, it is whether countries elect pro-American leaders. This is why Iran is "out-of-step."
 
  • #4
SOS2008 said:
Exactly. They elected a leader who is a religious hard-liner, just like the U.S.

Seriously, it isn't whether countries practice democracy, it is whether countries elect pro-American leaders. This is why Iran is "out-of-step."
Yes. It is a simple fact of life, Extremism breeds Extremism.
 
  • #5
Does that mean that Centrism breeds Centrism? I hope not, I think the latin translation of that is "We're doomed".
 
  • #6
If we look at the neocon domino concept in general we can see there is no validity to it. In the Middle East alone, look at Lebanon or even more moderate states such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, etc. If Iraq were allowed real democracy (real control of their government), it is very likely they would elect a religious leader as well.

Trying to make every country fit a certain mold is ridiculous, for example Afghanistan, where the culture doesn't correspond with women's rights. The neocons are idiots. And anyone who believes it is US foreign policy to spread democracy is naive. The US will support any leader who espouses pro-American rhetoric/sentiment--look at Pakistan, or who serves our interests at a given time, such as Saddam during the war with Iran.

As for nation building, I believe Rumsfeld just admitted we will need to be in Iraq 12 more years. If we do the math (lives, money, troops) over 12 years--sounds like a great idea, huh? Freedom and peace! We're spreading democracy! It's propaganda by the Bush regime as a cover-up for destroying our country.
 

1. What are the reasons behind the religious hard-liner victory in Iran's elections?

The victory of religious hard-liners in Iran's elections can be attributed to a number of factors. One of the main reasons is the disqualification of moderate and reformist candidates by the Guardian Council, which is controlled by hard-liners. Additionally, the economic hardships faced by Iranians and the lack of significant progress in nuclear talks with the West may have also played a role in the outcome of the elections.

2. How will the religious hard-liner victory impact Iran's relations with other countries?

The victory of religious hard-liners is likely to result in a more conservative and hard-line approach in Iran's foreign policy. This could lead to further tensions with Western countries and a potential shift towards closer ties with countries like China and Russia, who have more friendly relations with Iran.

3. Is there a domino effect at work in Iran's elections?

It is possible that the victory of religious hard-liners in Iran's elections could have a domino effect in other countries in the region. This is because Iran is seen as a major power and influencer in the Middle East, and the outcome of its elections could potentially impact the political landscape of neighboring countries.

4. What are the potential implications of a more hard-line government in Iran?

A more hard-line government in Iran could result in increased censorship and restrictions on freedom of speech and human rights. It could also lead to a more conservative approach in social and cultural issues and a potential crackdown on dissent and political opposition.

5. Will there be any changes in Iran's nuclear program under the new government?

It is unlikely that the new hard-line government in Iran will make significant changes to the country's nuclear program. The program is seen as a source of national pride and a deterrent against potential threats from other countries. However, the stance towards nuclear talks with the West may become more confrontational and less cooperative.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
7
Replies
232
Views
23K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • General Discussion
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
109
Views
54K
  • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • General Discussion
Replies
11
Views
25K
Back
Top