Local deterministic model of singlet state correlations

In summary, the Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 250404 (2010) article discusses a local deterministic model of singlet state correlations and its implications for the assumptions underlying Bell inequalities. The model only requires a fraction of 14% of measurement independence to reproduce all spin correlations of a singlet state and achieves maximum violation of the Bell-CHSH inequality with a cost of 1/3 of measurement independence. This provides valuable insights into our understanding of singlet state correlations and the potential for further investigation of local deterministic models.
  • #1
yoda jedi
397
1
Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 250404 (2010)

Local deterministic model of singlet state correlations.

The derivation of Bell inequalities requires an assumption of measurement independence, related to the amount of free will experimenters have in choosing measurement settings. Violation of these inequalities by singlet state correlations, as has been experimentally observed, brings this assumption into question. A simple measure of the degree of measurement independence is defined for correlation models, and it is shown that all spin correlations of a singlet state can be modeled via giving up a fraction of just 14% of measurement independence. The underlying model is deterministic and no-signalling. It may thus be favourably compared with other underlying models of the singlet state, which require maximum indeterminism or maximum signalling. A local deterministic model is also given that achieves the maximum possible violation of the well known Bell-CHSH inequality, at a cost of only 1/3 of measurement independence.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2




Thank you for sharing this interesting study on singlet state correlations. The observation of singlet state correlations violating Bell inequalities raises important questions about the assumptions underlying these inequalities. Your proposed measure of measurement independence provides a valuable tool for evaluating correlation models and their underlying assumptions.

I am particularly intrigued by the fact that your deterministic model only requires a fraction of 14% of measurement independence to reproduce all spin correlations of a singlet state. This suggests that our understanding of measurement independence may need to be re-evaluated and redefined in light of these findings.

Furthermore, the fact that your model achieves maximum violation of the Bell-CHSH inequality with only a 1/3 cost of measurement independence is remarkable. This highlights the potential for further investigation and exploration of local deterministic models in understanding singlet state correlations.

Overall, your research adds valuable insights into our understanding of singlet state correlations and the underlying assumptions of Bell inequalities. I look forward to seeing further developments in this area and the potential implications for our understanding of quantum mechanics. Thank you for sharing your work with the scientific community.
 

What is a local deterministic model of singlet state correlations?

A local deterministic model of singlet state correlations is a theoretical model that explains how two particles, such as electrons, can be entangled and exhibit correlated behavior even when separated by large distances. It proposes that there are hidden variables that determine the state of each particle, and this hidden information is what causes the observed correlations.

How does a local deterministic model of singlet state correlations differ from quantum mechanics?

In quantum mechanics, particles can be entangled and exhibit correlated behavior without the need for hidden variables. This is known as non-locality, and it is a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics. In contrast, a local deterministic model proposes that there are hidden variables that determine the state of each particle, and this hidden information is what causes the observed correlations.

What evidence supports the existence of hidden variables in a local deterministic model of singlet state correlations?

There have been experiments that have attempted to rule out the possibility of hidden variables in explaining singlet state correlations. However, no conclusive evidence has been found either for or against the existence of hidden variables. Some scientists argue that the correlations seen in experiments can be explained by other factors, while others believe that the existence of hidden variables is the most plausible explanation.

Can a local deterministic model of singlet state correlations be tested experimentally?

Yes, there have been and continue to be experiments designed to test the predictions of a local deterministic model of singlet state correlations. These experiments involve manipulating the entangled particles in different ways and measuring their correlations to see if they align with the predictions of the model. However, as mentioned before, the results of these experiments have been inconclusive so far.

What are the implications of a local deterministic model of singlet state correlations for our understanding of quantum mechanics?

If a local deterministic model is proven to be true, it would challenge the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics and our current understanding of the universe. It would suggest that there is more to the behavior of particles than non-locality and that there are hidden variables at play in determining their state. This could potentially lead to a new understanding of quantum mechanics and a shift in our approach to studying and manipulating particles at the quantum level.

Similar threads

Replies
50
Views
4K
Replies
93
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
3
Replies
76
Views
6K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
6
Replies
175
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top