100% Mathematical Proof vs Vellmen's How to Prove it

In summary, "100% Mathematical Proof" by Rowan Garnier and co-author is recommended as a superior book for learning proof techniques, while Velleman's "How to Prove It" is also a popular choice but may be too focused on set theory for beginning students. "100% Mathematical Proof" is praised for its lucid explanations and includes answers to exercises, making it a valuable resource for self-study. It also helps readers understand the structure and axiomatic base of mathematical theories. On the other hand, some reviewers find "How to Prove It" to be too chaotic and not as useful in terms of practical application. Other resources, such as "Discrete Mathematics with Graph Theory" by Goodaire & Par
  • #1
abelgalois
26
0
"100% Mathematical Proof" vs Vellmen's "How to Prove it"

Hello, I'm looking for books that teach proof methods and techniques. I know Vellemen's book is a popular choice but a few dissenting reviews among unanimous praise, on its amazon page, caught my attention. Like this one:

I found that this book utilized a little too much set theory for beginning students. If the author could have given more concrete examples, perhaps from group theory or simpler ones from analysis or number theory, it would have been much better. For students wanting a more lucid exposition of proof techniques, I highly recommend, "100% Mathematical Proof" by Rowan Garnier and someone else,whos name escapes me at the moment. "100% Mathematical Proof" is far superior to this book, and it has answers to the exercises which is crucial to the beginning student learning on his/her own. Velleman needs to bring the abstract nearer to the concrete for the beginning student.

And here are a coupe of positive reviews under "100% Mathematical Proofs" page:
This sentence exactly describes the books content. You'll find a lucid explanation without any shortcoming. This is the math that masters keep as secret of their kingdom. This book reveals all secrets and you'll see, masters are also humans like you.

You'll understand what the real power of mathematical proofs (without mythes). Further you'll have a good idea about the structure of mathematical theories, and their axiomatic base.


I first came across this book while searching for similar titles in a university library. Of all of the books on mathematical logic/proofs, this one stands as the definitive source for proof techniques of all skill levels. This book is easy to read, while at the same time, presents the methods in a systematic way to help the reader's conceptual understanding and develop their full potential. I am a mathematics major and this book has helped me tremendously and I am sure it will do the same for others!

So has anyone else used this book to learn how to write proofs? How does it compare to Vellemen's book?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


I own Velleman's book, it's quite nice. I couldn't possibly imagine someone working through it and not being able to work through proofs.

As for 100% Mathematical Proof, just the fact that it says "This is the math that masters keep as secret of their kingdom. This book reveals all secrets and you'll see, masters are also humans like you. " is a turn off for me. Seriously, mathematics is not some mystical kung-fu, there are no super-secrets that only "masters" know; that's absolute nonsense.

Other opinions are welcome.
 
  • #3


DivisionByZro said:
mathematics is not some mystical kung-fu

I guess you haven't been initiated yet. :biggrin:

No, seriously, I also like Vellemans book more. It's true that it has more emphasis on set theory, but this is in fact a very good thing. Many people find mathematics difficult because they don't understand set theory well, so the faster you'll be introduced to set theory and the likes, the better for you.

Also, I found "100% mathematical proof" too chaotic. And a lot of the book is concerned with stuff you'll never need again...
 
  • #4


I have Velleman and I like it. However, I actually learned proofs (properly) from the first half this book:

Discrete Mathematics with Graph Theory
by Goodaire & Parmenter
http://www.abebooks.com/products/isbn/9780131679955/4747967302

... which I thought was good. It has more worked out solutions than Velleman.

To learn proof, you need something worthwhile to do proofs on. Basic set theory, discrete math and simple number theory are often the easiest places to start.

Edit: The reviews on Amazon for it are misleading. Discrete math is often required in CS programs and many students come to Proof courses totally unprepared. Most of the reviews are from people who are totally clueless.
 
  • #5


I can say that both "100% Mathematical Proof" and Vellmen's "How to Prove it" are valuable resources for learning about proof techniques. However, it is important to note that these books may have different approaches and may cater to different levels of understanding. While some may find Vellmen's book to be more abstract and challenging, others may appreciate the clear and concrete examples in "100% Mathematical Proof." It ultimately depends on the individual's learning style and level of mathematical background. I would recommend trying out both books and seeing which one works best for you. Additionally, it is always helpful to consult a variety of resources when learning a new concept, so don't limit yourself to just one book.
 

1. What is the difference between "100% Mathematical Proof" and "Vellmen's How to Prove it"?

"100% Mathematical Proof" and "Vellmen's How to Prove it" are both books that teach methods for constructing and presenting mathematical proofs. However, "100% Mathematical Proof" focuses on providing a rigorous and thorough approach to proving mathematical statements, while "Vellmen's How to Prove it" offers a more intuitive and accessible approach.

2. Can these books be used for self-study or are they better suited for classroom use?

Both "100% Mathematical Proof" and "Vellmen's How to Prove it" can be used for self-study. They both provide clear explanations and examples that make it possible for readers to learn the material on their own. However, they can also be used in a classroom setting with the guidance of a teacher.

3. Are these books suitable for beginners in mathematical proof writing?

Yes, both "100% Mathematical Proof" and "Vellmen's How to Prove it" are suitable for beginners in mathematical proof writing. They both start with the basics of proof writing and gradually introduce more advanced concepts, making them accessible to readers with varying levels of experience.

4. Do these books cover all types of mathematical proofs?

While "100% Mathematical Proof" and "Vellmen's How to Prove it" cover a wide range of proof techniques, it is impossible to cover every single type of mathematical proof in a single book. However, they provide the fundamental tools and methods needed to construct and understand various types of proofs.

5. Can these books be used for advanced mathematics or are they more suitable for introductory courses?

Both "100% Mathematical Proof" and "Vellmen's How to Prove it" can be used for advanced mathematics. While they are great resources for introductory courses, they also cover more advanced topics and techniques that are essential for understanding and constructing proofs in higher-level mathematics.

Similar threads

  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
0
Views
645
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top