Was the Battle of Agincourt as One-Sided as History Claims?

  • Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date
In summary, a group of historians have questioned the accuracy of the figures recorded by medieval chroniclers for the Battle of Agincourt, suggesting that the English may not have been outnumbered by as much as previously believed. Further research is being conducted to determine the true numbers of soldiers involved. The battle remains a significant event in history, showcasing the success of English archers against heavily armored French nobles.
  • #1
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
2023 Award
21,905
6,321
Historians Reassess Battle of Agincourt
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/25/world/europe/25agincourt.html

MAISONCELLE, France — The heavy clay-laced mud behind the cattle pen on Antoine Renault’s farm looks as treacherous as it must have been nearly 600 years ago, when King Henry V rode from a spot near here to lead a sodden and exhausted English Army against a French force that was said to outnumber his by as much as five to one.

No one can ever take away the shocking victory by Henry and his “band of brothers,” as Shakespeare would famously call them, on St. Crispin’s Day, Oct. 25, 1415. They devastated a force of heavily armored French nobles who had gotten bogged down in the region’s sucking mud, riddled by thousands of arrows from English longbowmen and outmaneuvered by common soldiers with much lighter gear. It would become known as the Battle of Agincourt.

But Agincourt’s status as perhaps the greatest victory against overwhelming odds in military history — and a keystone of the English self-image — has been called into doubt by a group of historians in Britain and France who have painstakingly combed an array of military and tax records from that time and now take a skeptical view of the figures handed down by medieval chroniclers.

The historians have concluded that the English could not have been outnumbered by more than about two to one. And depending on how the math is carried out, Henry may well have faced something closer to an even fight, said Anne Curry, a professor at the University of Southampton who is leading the study.
. . . .

Related site - http://www.icmacentre.ac.uk/soldier/database/index.php

I found only one relative who was an archer.

The Soldier in later Medieval England
http://www.icmacentre.ac.uk/soldier/database/som.php
http://www.icmacentre.ac.uk/soldier/database/conf.php
www.medievalsoldier.org
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Thanks for the links provided, makes for some interesting reading.
 
  • #3
This is interesting reserch, but a long way to go before accepted history gets changed I think. Even if the numbers were quite even, it was still a great victory as a group of archers defeated a group of better trained, higher class knights.
 

1. What was the significance of the Battle of Agincourt?

The Battle of Agincourt was a significant military victory for England during the Hundred Years' War. It resulted in the defeat of a larger French army and solidified England's dominance in the war. It also boosted the morale and reputation of King Henry V of England.

2. How did the Battle of Agincourt impact the Hundred Years' War?

The Battle of Agincourt marked a turning point in the Hundred Years' War. It weakened the French army and gave England an advantage in future battles. It also allowed England to gain control of more French territories and increased their overall power in Europe.

3. What were the key factors that led to England's victory in the Battle of Agincourt?

The key factors that led to England's victory in the Battle of Agincourt were their superior longbowmen, the muddy terrain which slowed down the heavily armored French cavalry, and the strategic leadership of King Henry V.

4. How did the Battle of Agincourt impact warfare tactics and technology?

The Battle of Agincourt highlighted the effectiveness of longbowmen in battle and led to an increase in their use in future wars. It also showed the importance of strategic planning and the potential impact of terrain on battle outcomes. Additionally, it led to advancements in armor and weapons as both sides sought to improve their military tactics.

5. What role did the Battle of Agincourt play in shaping English national identity?

The Battle of Agincourt is often seen as a defining moment in English history and has become a symbol of English courage and triumph against all odds. It has been depicted in literature, art, and film, further solidifying its place in the English national identity. The victory also reinforced a sense of patriotism and unity among the English people.

Back
Top