Is there some reverse of annihilation?

In summary, when heavy nuclei split up we get energy, when light nuclei join together we get energy. When elemental particles split up in annihilation we get energy (photons). What if we join certain photons together?Could we obtain energy in this way and make analog of nuclear fusion?
  • #1
Stanley514
411
2
When heavy nuclei split up we get energy,when light nuclei join together we get energy.
When elemental particles split up in annihilation we get energy (photons).
What if we join certain photons together?Could we obtain energy in this way and make analog of
nuclear fusion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Stanley514 said:
When heavy nuclei split up we get energy,when light nuclei join together we get energy.
When elemental particles split up in annihilation we get energy (photons).
What if we join certain photons together?Could we obtain energy in this way and make analog of
nuclear fusion?

Yes. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_creation.
 
  • #3
See 'pair production'.

a large enough electric field applied to a vacuum will create positron-electron pairs.
 
  • #4
I also mean something that could generate net energy similar to fusion and be used by humans.
 
  • #5
Stanley514 said:
When heavy nuclei split up we get energy,when light nuclei join together we get energy.
When elemental particles split up in annihilation we get energy (photons).
What if we join certain photons together?Could we obtain energy in this way and make analog of nuclear fusion?
When heavy nuclei split up, the resulting masses are less, and the mass difference is converted to energy (photons, heat). The remaining mass is the minimum mass subject to constraints (e.g., baryon number).

In fusion reactions, the resulting masses are less, and the mass difference is converted to energy (photons, heat). The remaining mass is the minimum mass subject to constraints.

When two photons produce particles (e.g., baryon anti-baryon pair) the anti-baryon quickly annihilates with a baryon (not the same one), and the baryon count remains zero, with no net energy released.

[added] Beta decay will often occur immediately after these processes, and (anti)-neutrinos will then carry off some un-recoverable energy.

Bob S
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Beta decay will often occur immediately after these processes, and (anti)-neutrinos will then carry off some un-recoverable energy.

Could you give some link to more detailed info in this subject?
Beta decay from where is happening?Does it mean that energy conservation law is violated?

There is also such technique as frequency doubling when one two photons combine to form one with greater energy.
Do such combinations or maybe spliting generate some net energy?Or they always loose it?
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Although beta decay is not directly part of nuclear fission, the beta-day lifetimes are sometimes so short that the additional beta-decay energy released can be counted as part of the total energy release in the total fission fragmentation process. There are many neutron-rich fission products with half-lives in the millisecond range.

When I referred to (anti) neutrinos carrying away "un-recoverable" energy, I did not mean that the energy is lost. The neutrinos end up in some other galaxy in a few thousand light-years, and release their energy there, but the energy is never really "lost". Energy is always conserved in some form, of which the lowest forms (when there are no constraints) are photons or phonons; gammas, X-rays. UV, light, IR, etc. With one exception (that I can think of), neutrinos are always released in a continuous spectrum up to a fixed-energy end point (Curie point), and never in a discrete energy line, like the 661-KeV Cs-137 gamma ray line for example.

When two equal-energy photons collide and create a matter-antimatter pair, the energy of the two photons adds to produce ECM, or total energy in the center of mass. But the two photons do not literally couple to produce a single photon of twice the energy (e.g., "frequency doubling", like in lasers). Look up two-photon physics.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-photon_physics

Bob S
 
  • #8
Is it possible to stimulate beta decay of isotopes with very strong electrical fields?
There is lot of isotopes in Earth crust,for example zinc-70 or Ptassium-40 which have very long beta decay half life.If we could stimulate very short half-life in them we could create clean neutroneless energetics.
http://prc.aps.org/abstract/PRC/v29/i5/p1825_1
 

1. Is it possible for matter and anti-matter to merge and create a reverse of annihilation?

Yes, it is possible for matter and anti-matter to combine and create a reverse of annihilation, known as re-annihilation. This occurs when a particle of matter and a corresponding anti-particle collide and annihilate, releasing energy in the form of photons.

2. Can the reverse of annihilation be used as a source of energy?

Yes, the reverse of annihilation can potentially be used as a source of energy. However, the amount of energy released during re-annihilation is relatively small compared to the energy required to create the matter and anti-matter particles in the first place. Therefore, it is not currently a feasible source of energy.

3. Are there any natural occurrences of the reverse of annihilation?

Yes, there are natural occurrences of the reverse of annihilation, such as in the decay of radioactive elements. During this process, a particle of matter and a corresponding anti-particle annihilate, releasing energy in the form of gamma rays.

4. Can scientists control the reverse of annihilation?

Currently, scientists do not have the technology or means to control the reverse of annihilation. However, research is being done to better understand this process and potentially harness it for practical applications in the future.

5. Is there a way to reverse the effects of annihilation?

In theory, it is possible to reverse the effects of annihilation by combining the same particles that were annihilated in the first place. However, this process is extremely difficult and not currently feasible with our current understanding and technology.

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
15
Views
869
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
636
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
883
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
717
Back
Top