Register to reply 
Vector equations, possible to solve for x? 
Share this thread: 
#1
May114, 04:14 AM

P: 22

Hello there,
In scalar algebra, I find solving for variables a useful tool. Say ohms law, I want to find ##R## so: $$ U=RI \iff R = \frac{U}{I} $$ Can I do something analogous in vector equations? I.e. May I solve for ##\vec{\omega}## in equations using cross or dot products? $$ \vec{v} = \vec{\omega} \times \vec{r} \iff \vec{\omega} = ? $$ or: $$ \vec{\alpha} \cdot \vec{\beta} = \gamma \iff \vec{\beta} = ? $$ It would be fantastic if I could solve for vectors in some way. Hope you are able to help. Thank you for your time! Kind regards, Marius 


#2
May114, 04:51 AM

PF Gold
P: 375

Solving v=wxr makes sense, since this can be seen as solving 3 equations with 3 unknowns (each components).
You can find the solution easily by "multiplying" both sides by r: rxv = rx(wxr) = w (r.r)  r (w.r) . Solving a.b=c makes less sense, since this can be seen as solving 1 equation with three unknowns. Actually there is an infinite number of solutions to this equation. If you have one solution b=bo, then you can add any vector b1 such that a.b1=0 to this solution, and you will get another solution b = bo+b1. Any b1 just need to be perpendicular to a. 


#3
May114, 04:56 AM

P: 22




#4
May114, 05:08 AM

P: 362

Vector equations, possible to solve for x?
With V=W X R you end up with three equations corresponding to the three components of V.
With v=W o R you end up with one equation because v is a scalar, and three unknowns for W. 


#5
May114, 06:03 AM

P: 949

Given any solution w for v = w cross r and any scalar k then w + kr is another solution. 


#6
May114, 06:11 AM

P: 22

I want to learn about this topic in vector algebra.
1. What is the topic called? 2. Is this correct? And how then do I solve for ##\vec{\omega}##? $$ \vec{v} = \vec{\omega} \times \vec{r} \iff \vec{r} \times \vec{v} = \vec{r} \times (\vec{\omega} \times \vec{r}) = \vec{\omega} (\vec{r}^2)  \vec{r}(\vec{r} \cdot \vec{\omega}) $$ Now what? 3. Does it hold for compex vectors? Thanks.M 


#7
May114, 07:01 AM

P: 362




#8
May114, 07:27 AM

P: 949

The reason it's not reversible is that you can't uniquely divide by r. Since the purpose of the exercise was to demonstrate that you can uniquely divide by r, asserting that you can divide by r would amount to a circular argument. 


#9
May114, 07:40 AM

Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,533

And, you have the difficulty that the solutions will seldom be unique. As obvious example if [itex]\vec{a}\times\vec{x}= \vec{0}[/itex] or [itex]\vec{a}\cdot\vec{x}= 0[/itex], [itex]\vec{x}[/itex] can be any vector perpendicular to [itex]\vec{a}[/itex]



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
How I can solve this two equations... ?  Introductory Physics Homework  3  
How do I Solve these two equations?  Calculus & Beyond Homework  1  
Best way to solve equations like that  Precalculus Mathematics Homework  1  
Using SVD to solve a set of equations.  Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework  1  
How to solve this set of equations?  Linear & Abstract Algebra  3 