What's the reason for this epsilon? (about Schwinger effect)

In summary: In both cases, the infinitesimal is a necessary tool to ensure the validity of the calculations.In summary, Schwinger and the author of the second paper both added infinitesimals to their equations in order to ensure well-defined results. In Schwinger's case, the infinitesimal was added to the denominator to avoid division by zero, while in the second paper, the infinitesimal was added to the integration contour to ensure convergence. Both infinitesimals serve a similar purpose of guaranteeing the validity of the calculations.
  • #1
cello
11
0
In Schwinger's classic http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.82.664" on pair production, he inserted an infinitesimal to get the desired pair production rate. (On page 13, he said: "We shall now simply remark that, to extend our results to pair-production fields, it is merely necessary to add an infinitesimal negative imaginary constant to the denominator of Eq. (6.30) ")

Also I found a pedagogical http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.19313" in which the author said "Defining the integration contour by infinitesimal semicircular deviations into the upper half plane from the straight line path (in order to guarantee exponential decay)." It seems that this is a choice made by hand.

Can anyone explain in detail the justification for this epsilon? I'm aware of the epsilon we added to the time (or the mass) when doing path integral, but I can't see if the epsilon in Schwinger's paper is of the same nature.

You can download the two papers I mentioned http://ifile.it/u9smtwa", if you don't have the access.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In Schwinger's paper, the infinitesimal is added to the denominator of a specific equation (6.30). The purpose of this infinitesimal is to make sure that the denominator does not become zero, which would lead to an undefined result. By introducing the infinitesimal, the denominator is always non-zero and the resulting equation is well-defined.In the second paper, the infinitesimal is added to the integration contour. This is done to guarantee exponential decay of the integrand. Without adding the infinitesimal, the integral could potentially diverge. By adding the infinitesimal, the integral converges and the result is well-defined.
 

1. What is the Schwinger effect?

The Schwinger effect, also known as vacuum polarization, is a quantum phenomenon in which a strong electric field can create pairs of particles from the vacuum. These particles have opposite charges and quickly annihilate each other, but their presence can still be detected through various effects.

2. What is the significance of the epsilon constant in the Schwinger effect?

The epsilon constant, also known as the dielectric constant, plays a crucial role in the Schwinger effect. It represents the strength of the electric field and determines the probability of pair creation. A higher epsilon value means a stronger electric field and a higher likelihood of pair creation.

3. How does the Schwinger effect relate to quantum electrodynamics?

The Schwinger effect is a fundamental phenomenon in quantum electrodynamics, which is the theory that describes the interactions of particles with electromagnetic fields. It is a prediction of the theory and has been experimentally confirmed through various experiments.

4. Can the Schwinger effect be observed in everyday life?

No, the Schwinger effect is a quantum phenomenon that occurs at extremely small scales and requires a strong electric field. It cannot be observed in everyday life, but its effects have been observed and studied in laboratory experiments.

5. Are there any practical applications of the Schwinger effect?

While the Schwinger effect itself may not have practical applications, the understanding of quantum electrodynamics and vacuum polarization has led to advancements in technology such as lasers and particle accelerators. It also plays a crucial role in our understanding of the behavior of matter at the smallest scales.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
1
Views
519
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top