| New Reply |
is Wronskian sign arbitrary? |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Mar20-13, 06:38 PM | #1 |
|
|
is Wronskian sign arbitrary?
On my DE test, I was asked to determine if two solutions to a DE are fundamental solutions.
So I confirmed they were both solutions, and took the Wronskian, which was nonzero. I got points marked off, and he put a minus sign in front of my wronskian result. Isn't the sign of the Wronskian determined by what function I call y1 and what function I call y2 and is thus completely arbitrary? |
| Mar20-13, 10:36 PM | #2 |
|
|
Yes the sign on the Wronskian is determined by the ordering that you assign to the functions. It's a weak excuse, but the grader was probably just comparing your answer with their solution sheet and saw the sign difference and didn't think about why they were different.
|
| Mar25-13, 09:38 AM | #3 |
|
|
Well, I looked at the test and on the paper the functions were called y1 and y2 already, and in my work I did write W[y1,y2] = my wronskian.
So I guess I can understand. I don't think I'll argue this one. I noticed that the wronskian order is arbitrary early off and have just been taking the easier derivative first. |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: is Wronskian sign arbitrary?
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| The Wronskian and the Derivative of the Wronskian | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 2 | ||
| I have a Wronskian Question?If the Wronskian W of f and g is t^2*e^t | Differential Equations | 3 | ||
| Can Wronskian be used for all? | Differential Equations | 4 | ||
| Wronskian | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 2 | ||
| Wronskian | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 7 | ||