Integral formula for vector potential

In summary, the Wikipedia article discusses a formula for vector potentials, which can be written as an integral with a test function and derivatives. The article also mentions another formula, which is equivalent to the first one but with one derivative operator outside the integral. However, there are difficulties in proving this due to the presence of a second term with derivatives. This can be resolved by substituting and using integration by parts, assuming that the divergence of the test function is zero.
  • #1
jostpuur
2,116
19
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_potential

The Wikipedia article is mentioning an interesting formula for defining vector potentials. Isn't that the same thing as a formula

[tex]
\nabla\times\int d^3y\;(V(y)\times\nabla)\frac{1}{\|x-y\|} = -4\pi V(x),
[/tex]

where [tex]V:\mathbb{R}^3\to\mathbb{R}^3[/tex] is some test function, and nablas are derivatives with respect to x? I tried to prove this, and reduced it first to a formula

[tex]
\sum_{j,k,m=1}^3 \epsilon_{ijk}\epsilon_{lmk} \partial_j \partial_m \frac{1}{\|x-y\|} = -4\pi\delta_{il}\delta^3(x - y).
[/tex]

This formula is to interpreted so that actually there should be an integral with some test function, and at least other one of the derivative operators should be somewhere else, like outside the integral, or acting on the test function with minus sign.

These formulas should be equivalent:

[tex]
\Big(\nabla\times\int d^3y\;(V(y)\times\nabla)\frac{1}{\|x-y\|}\Big)_i
=\epsilon_{ijk}\partial_j \int d^3y\; (V(y)\times\nabla)_k \frac{1}{\|x-y\|} = \epsilon_{ijk}\underbrace{\epsilon_{klm}}_{=\epsilon_{lmk}} \partial_j \int d^3y\; V_l(y)\partial_m \frac{1}{\|x-y\|}
[/tex]

But then I encountered problems when trying to prove this. By substituting

[tex]
\sum_{k=1}^3 \epsilon_{ijk}\epsilon_{lmk} = \delta_{il}\delta_{jm} - \delta_{im}\delta_{jl}
[/tex]

we get

[tex]
\sum_{j,m=1}^3(\delta_{il}\delta_{jm} - \delta_{im}\delta_{jl})\partial_j\partial_m \frac{1}{\|x-y\|} = \delta_{il}\nabla^2 \frac{1}{\|x-y\|}\; -\; \partial_l\partial_i \frac{1}{\|x-y\|},
[/tex]

but now the second term with derivatives [tex]\partial_l\partial_i[/tex] is messing everything. The first term is already all we would want, because it is known result that

[tex]
\nabla^2\frac{1}{\|x-y\|} = -4\pi\delta^3(x-y)
[/tex]

again in the sense that there should be a test function, and derivatives outside the integral.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Now I understood this :cool: After replacing the derivative with respect to x into an derivative with respect to y, and integration by parts, the second term gives

[tex]
\int d^3y\; (\partial_l V_l(y)) \partial_m \frac{1}{\|x-y\|} = 0
[/tex]

if [tex]\nabla\cdot V=0[/tex] is assumed.
 

What is the integral formula for vector potential?

The integral formula for vector potential is a mathematical equation used in electromagnetism to calculate the vector potential at a specific point in space due to a given current distribution. It is written as A(r) = ∫V(J(r')/|r-r'|)dτ where A(r) is the vector potential, V is the volume of the current distribution, J(r') is the current density, and r and r' are the position vectors.

What is the significance of the integral formula for vector potential?

The integral formula for vector potential is significant because it allows us to calculate the vector potential at any point in space due to a given current distribution. This is useful in many practical applications, such as designing electromagnets and studying the behavior of electric and magnetic fields.

How is the integral formula for vector potential derived?

The integral formula for vector potential is derived from Maxwell's equations, specifically the equation ∇ × B = μ0J, which relates the curl of the magnetic field to the current density. By taking the curl of both sides and applying the vector identity ∇ × (∇ × V) = ∇∇ · V - ∇· ∇V, we can obtain the integral formula for vector potential.

Can the integral formula for vector potential be applied to non-static situations?

Yes, the integral formula for vector potential can be applied to non-static situations, as long as the current density is known at each point in time. This is because the integral is taken over the entire volume of the current distribution, which can vary with time.

Are there any limitations to using the integral formula for vector potential?

One limitation of the integral formula for vector potential is that it assumes a steady current distribution. It also does not take into account any changes in the current distribution over time. Additionally, it is not applicable to situations where there are changing electric fields, as it only considers the effects of magnetic fields.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
304
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
319
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
6
Views
910
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
899
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
1
Views
488
Back
Top