Prove that every non-zero vector in V is a maximal vector

  • Thread starter Ninty64
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Vector
In summary: But this would imply that μ_T(\vec{v}+ \vec{w}) = μ_T(x)g(\vec{v}+ \vec{w}) = 0, which is a contradiction since μ_T(\vec{v}+ \vec{w}) is a non-zero constant. Therefore, f(x) is not a multiple of μ_T(x).Since f(x) is a non-zero polynomial of degree less than or equal to the degree of μ_T(x), and f(x) is not a multiple of μ_T(x), we can conclude that gcd(μ_T(x), f(x)) = 1. This means that μ_T(x) and f(x) are relatively prime
  • #1
Ninty64
46
0

Homework Statement


Let V be a finite dimensional vector space and T is an operator on V. Assume [itex]μ_{T}(x)[/itex] is an irreducible polynomial. Prove that every non-zero vector in V is a maximal vector.

Homework Equations


[itex]μ_{T}(x)[/itex] is the minimal polynomial on V with respect to T.

The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure how to go about solving this problem. I know that if T is cyclic then [itex]\exists \vec{v} \in V[/itex] such that [itex]<T,\vec{v}>=V[/itex], then for any [itex]\vec{w}\in V[/itex],
[itex]\exists f(x) \in F[x][/itex] such that [itex] \vec{w} = f(T)(\vec{v})[/itex]
and it follows that [itex]μ_{T,\vec{w}}(x) = \frac{μ_{T}(x)}{gcd(μ_{T}(x),f(x))}[/itex]
However, since [itex]μ_{T}(x)[/itex] is an irreducible polynomial, then [itex]gcd(μ_{T}(x),f(x)) = μ_{T}(x)[/itex] or [itex]gcd(μ_{T}(x),f(x)) = 1[/itex]
If [itex]gcd(μ_{T}(x),f(x)) = μ_{T}(x)[/itex], then [itex]μ_{T,\vec{w}}(x) = 1[/itex], which implies that [itex]\vec{w} = I(\vec{w}) = \vec{0}[/itex]
If [itex]gcd(μ_{T}(x),f(x)) = 1[/itex], then [itex]μ_{T,\vec{w}}(x) = μ_{T}(x)[/itex], which means that [itex]\vec{w}[/itex] is a maximal vector. Thus every non-zero vector in V is a maximal vector.

However, I'm not sure how to prove that T is cyclic.

I also attempted to find the minimal polynomials with respect to the basis vectors for V.
Since [itex]μ_{T}(x) = lcm(μ_{T,\vec{v_1}}(x),μ_{T\vec{v_2}}(x),...,μ_{T,\vec{v_n}}(x))[/itex]
[itex]\Rightarrow μ_{T}(x)=μ_{T,\vec{v_1}}(x)=μ_{T,\vec{v_2}}(x)=...=μ_{T,\vec{v_n}}(x)[/itex] since the minimal polynomial is irreducible. But then I didn't know where to go from there either.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


I'm not sure how to use the fact that μ_{T}(x) is an irreducible polynomial to prove that every non-zero vector in V is a maximal vector. I would appreciate any guidance or suggestions on how to approach this problem.

Dear fellow scientist,

Thank you for your post. The key to solving this problem lies in understanding the properties of irreducible polynomials and their relationship to linear operators. First, let's define what it means for a vector to be maximal in a vector space.

A vector \vec{v} is maximal in a vector space V if and only if there exists no non-zero vector \vec{w} in V such that \vec{v} + \vec{w} \in V. In other words, \vec{v} is not a proper subset of any other vector in V.

Now, let's consider the minimal polynomial μ_T(x) of an operator T on V. As you correctly stated, this polynomial is irreducible. This means that it cannot be factored into a product of two non-constant polynomials. In other words, μ_T(x) cannot be written as μ_T(x) = f(x)g(x), where f(x) and g(x) are non-constant polynomials.

Now, let's suppose that there exists a non-zero vector \vec{v} in V that is not maximal. This means that there exists a non-zero vector \vec{w} in V such that \vec{v} + \vec{w} \in V. We can then define a polynomial f(x) as follows:

f(x) = μ_T(x) - μ_T(\vec{v}+ \vec{w})

Note that f(x) is a polynomial of degree less than or equal to the degree of μ_T(x). Also note that f(x) is not the zero polynomial, since μ_T(x) is irreducible and μ_T(\vec{v}+ \vec{w}) is a non-zero constant. Therefore, f(x) is a non-zero polynomial of degree less than or equal to the degree of μ_T(x).

Now, we can use the fact that μ_T(x) is the minimal polynomial on V with respect to T to show that f(x) is not a multiple of μ_T(x). If f(x) were a multiple of μ_T(x), then we could write f(x) = μ_T(x)g(x)
 

1. What does it mean for a vector to be maximal?

A maximal vector in a vector space V is one that cannot be extended to a longer vector without leaving the vector space. In other words, it is a vector that cannot be expressed as a linear combination of other vectors in V.

2. How do you prove that a vector is maximal?

To prove that a vector is maximal, you must show that it cannot be written as a linear combination of other vectors in the vector space. This can be done by assuming that the vector can be extended and then showing that it leads to a contradiction.

3. Is every non-zero vector in a vector space V maximal?

No, not every non-zero vector in a vector space V is maximal. A vector can only be considered maximal if it cannot be extended to a longer vector without leaving the vector space. There may be non-zero vectors in V that can be extended in such a way.

4. Can a vector be both maximal and minimal in a vector space V?

No, a vector cannot be both maximal and minimal in a vector space V. If a vector is maximal, it means that it cannot be extended to a longer vector without leaving the vector space. On the other hand, if a vector is minimal, it means that it cannot be reduced to a shorter vector without leaving the vector space. These two definitions are contradictory, so a vector cannot be both maximal and minimal.

5. How is the concept of maximal vectors useful in mathematics?

The concept of maximal vectors is useful in mathematics because it helps to define the structure and properties of vector spaces. It also allows us to prove important theorems, such as the existence of basis vectors, and to solve problems involving linear systems and transformations. Additionally, understanding maximal vectors can lead to a better understanding of linear independence, span, and dimension in vector spaces.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
441
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
783
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
582
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
607
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
187
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top