Magnitude and direction of the net force on a particle. Please help

In summary: You need to find the sum of the X components of the forces and the sum of the Y components of the forces. Then use Pythagoras to find the magnitude of the resultant force and trig to find the direction.In summary, the problem involves finding the magnitude and direction of the electric force on a particle at the origin, given three point charges arranged as shown in a figure. By calculating the forces contributed by each charge separately and adding them together using trigonometry, the resultant force can be found. The final answer should be entered with both the magnitude and direction.
  • #1
hzee
7
0

Homework Statement



Three point charges are arranged as shown in the figure below. (Take q1 = 5.70 nC, q2 = 4.60 nC, and q3 = -2.79 nC.)

(a) Find the magnitude of the electric force on the particle at the origin.


(b) Find the direction of the electric force on the particle at the origin.
2° (counter-clockwise from the +x-axis)


Homework Equations



Fab= k q1q2/r2



The Attempt at a Solution



I am attaching a photo of my last attempt to do this problem but I really think that I don't know what I am doing. I think I am using the wrong length and so I can't get the magnitude right. I can't even get to the direction part but I can't do that either because I don't know if I'm supposed to use sin or cos.
 

Attachments

  • physics.jpg
    physics.jpg
    30.3 KB · Views: 1,838
  • physics2.jpg
    physics2.jpg
    30.7 KB · Views: 1,502
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
hzee said:

Homework Statement



Three point charges are arranged as shown in the figure below. (Take q1 = 5.70 nC, q2 = 4.60 nC, and q3 = -2.79 nC.)

(a) Find the magnitude of the electric force on the particle at the origin.


(b) Find the direction of the electric force on the particle at the origin.
2° (counter-clockwise from the +x-axis)


Homework Equations



Fab= k q1q2/r2



The Attempt at a Solution



I am attaching a photo of my last attempt to do this problem but I really think that I don't know what I am doing. I think I am using the wrong length and so I can't get the magnitude right. I can't even get to the direction part but I can't do that either because I don't know if I'm supposed to use sin or cos.

You have said the charges are 3 m & 1 m apart when they are only 0.300 & 0.100

You won't use pythagorus on the triangle of distances, you will use it on the triangle of force, force and net force.

whether you use sin, cos or tan will depend which two forces you chose to work with: are the opposite, adjacent or hypotenuse of the triangle.
 
  • #3
I didn't study your work in detail because the first thing I noticed was that in your calculations you were somehow using the distance between q1 and q3. That distance does not directly affect the force on q2 and is not needed for a simple solution. Also, the distances on your work paper appear to be ten times greater than those shown on the problem.

The force on a particle is the sum of the forces contributed by all other particles. So to solve this, separately calculate the force between q1 and q2 (which, conveniently, has only an X component), and the force between q3 and q2 (which, conveniently, has only a Y component) and add those two vectors together to get the force vector on q2.
 
  • #4
Thank you both so much for the help. I feel like such a dummy about the distance. I think I have just been looking at these problems for too long.

Ok so I made the corrections you indicated and I'm still 10% wrong but idk where the problem is. I'm attaching my new work.
 

Attachments

  • physics3.jpg
    physics3.jpg
    27.6 KB · Views: 1,783
  • physics4.jpg
    physics4.jpg
    49.5 KB · Views: 1,048
  • #5
In what directions are each of the forces directed? (Pay attention to both the relative positions of the charges and their signs!). How do you add forces directed in different directions to find the net force and its magnitude?
 
  • #6
hzee said:
Thank you both so much for the help. I feel like such a dummy about the distance. I think I have just been looking at these problems for too long.

Ok so I made the corrections you indicated and I'm still 10% wrong but idk where the problem is. I'm attaching my new work.

You can't just add the two magnitudes at the end, they are perpendicular!

You need to draw triangle of forces, and use pythagorus to find the resultant force.

eg 2N west plus 1N South = 2.236N "south-west-ish". Trig can find the real direction.
 
  • #7
I didn't do the arithmetic so I'll assume its right, but you must still add those two vectors to get the sum of the forces on q2. Then convert to polar coords (magnitude and direction) because the question wants that. It looks like you entered in the 'magnitude' box only the magnitude of one of those vectors.

EDIT: Yep, what Peter said.
 
  • #8
gneill said:
In what directions are each of the forces directed? (Pay attention to both the relative positions of the charges and their signs!). How do you add forces directed in different directions to find the net force and its magnitude?

Well I thought that when the signs are the same the force is opposing so the sign should be neg and when the signs are different the force is attractive so the sign should be pos but when I tried that it didn't work.


PeterO said:
You can't just add the two magnitudes at the end, they are perpendicular!

You need to draw triangle of forces, and use pythagorus to find the resultant force.

eg 2N west plus 1N South = 2.236N "south-west-ish". Trig can find the real direction.

I understand what you mean but I don't know how to calculate it. Take the sq rt of the 2 forces squared? I don't know what I am doing and I'm kinda freaking out.

Would that be sq rt of (9.15X10^-7)^2 + (1.38X10^-6)^2

I don't want to enter the wrong answer again because it only gives me so many chances.
 
  • #9
hzee said:
Well I thought that when the signs are the same the force is opposing so the sign should be neg and when the signs are different the force is attractive so the sign should be pos but when I tried that it didn't work.




I understand what you mean but I don't know how to calculate it. Take the sq rt of the 2 forces squared? I don't know what I am doing and I'm kinda freaking out.

Would that be sq rt of (9.15X10^-7)^2 + (1.38X10^-6)^2

I don't want to enter the wrong answer again because it only gives me so many chances.

Where on Earth did you get those numbers? I don't see them written anywhere on the work sheet you showed us?
 
  • #10
PeterO said:
Where on Earth did you get those numbers? I don't see them written anywhere on the work sheet you showed us?

Sorry from a different problem (that I did get right)

It should have been 2.622X10^-6 and 1.155X10^-5

I was just looking at the wrong page when I typed that.
 
  • #11
hzee said:
Sorry from a different problem (that I did get right)

It should have been 2.622X10^-6 and 1.155X10^-5

I was just looking at the wrong page when I typed that.

I certainly think it is worth a shot if you use these values.
 
  • #12
YAY! Thank you so much! Now I just have to figure out how to do the second half and I will be done. I just have no idea where to even start. It has been so long since I did any of this and I don't remember much. Will you please just help me get started?
 
  • #13
hzee said:
Well I thought that when the signs are the same the force is opposing so the sign should be neg and when the signs are different the force is attractive so the sign should be pos but when I tried that it didn't work.

It works just fine, but you must also take into account the geometry of the charge arrangement! The forces individually act between pairs of charges, but those charges are located in some arrangement with respect to the coordinate system that you choose for the problem. So a force can end up with positive or negative components in the directions of the coordinate system axes whether or not it's created by an attraction or a repulsion.

Try sketching the force vectors on your diagram; place arrowed line segments with their "feet" attached to the object on which the force is acting and the pointy ends pointing in the direction that the force acts. Between charge pairs this will inevitably lie along a line joining the centers of the charge pair. After you've done this, then it's time to look at the vectors' orientation in the coordinate system and decide whether the x and y components of the vectors are positive or negative.
 
  • #14
gneill said:
It works just fine, but you must also take into account the geometry of the charge arrangement! The forces individually act between pairs of charges, but those charges are located in some arrangement with respect to the coordinate system that you choose for the problem. So a force can end up with positive or negative components in the directions of the coordinate system axes whether or not it's created by an attraction or a repulsion.

Try sketching the force vectors on your diagram; place arrowed line segments with their "feet" attached to the object on which the force is acting and the pointy ends pointing in the direction that the force acts. Between charge pairs this will inevitably lie along a line joining the centers of the charge pair. After you've done this, then it's time to look at the vectors' orientation in the coordinate system and decide whether the x and y components of the vectors are positive or negative.

I got it with all of your help, the (a) part anyway. I just don't know what to do about the (b) part. I think I need to find a Physics for Dummies book. I don't know how I'm going to get through this class. Its going to be a long semester...
 
  • #15
hzee said:
YAY! Thank you so much! Now I just have to figure out how to do the second half and I will be done. I just have no idea where to even start. It has been so long since I did any of this and I don't remember much. Will you please just help me get started?

You should review your vector math. This question is all about vector addition and converting from Cartesian to polar form.

You should be able to identify the x and y components of your resultant force vector (after all, you calculated the magnitude of the resultant from them!).
 
  • #16
Thanks again for your help everyone!
 

1. What is the definition of net force?

The net force on a particle is the overall or total force acting on the particle, taking into account both magnitude and direction.

2. How is net force calculated?

To calculate the net force on a particle, you must first determine all the individual forces acting on the particle and then add them together, taking into account their directions.

3. What does a positive net force mean?

A positive net force means that the overall force on the particle is in the same direction as its motion, causing it to accelerate in that direction.

4. How does the direction of net force affect the motion of a particle?

The direction of net force determines the direction of acceleration of a particle. If the net force is in the same direction as the particle's motion, it will accelerate in that direction. If the net force is in the opposite direction, it will decelerate or change direction.

5. Can the net force on a particle ever be zero?

Yes, the net force on a particle can be zero if all the individual forces acting on the particle are balanced and cancel each other out. This means that the particle will either remain at rest or continue to move at a constant velocity.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
587
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
950
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top