Register to reply

What is wrong with my summation formula?

by DerekZ10
Tags: formula, summation
Share this thread:
Mar7-14, 01:29 AM
P: 4
Im trying to find a general formula I can store in my calculator that can find the number of onto (surjective) functions exists for a relation of when M is mapped to N.

I can't seem to find a nice formula for it, but based on the below material I will show you what I have developed.

From: Discrete Mathemeatics and Its Applications 7th Edition Rosen pg. 561

From: Discrete Mathemeatics and Its Applications 7th Edition Rosen pg. 512

Random Chegg Problem from Google Search I'm using to verify with:

Here is what I've formed, written out:

In the TI nSpire CX CAS, it's written like this:

And as you can see, the chegg problem I'm trying to verify it with doesn't match!
But I think it should! If I manually iterate the function like so:

The values are correct and what Chegg is showing. What have I done wrong in my equation?
Phys.Org News Partner Mathematics news on
Professor quantifies how 'one thing leads to another'
Team announces construction of a formal computer-verified proof of the Kepler conjecture
Iranian is first woman to win 'Nobel Prize of maths' (Update)
Mar7-14, 02:00 AM
P: 462
Did you check that your summation formula matches the version that doesn't use sigma notation? i.e are all your ##m##s and ##n##s where they're supposed to be?
Mar7-14, 02:29 AM
P: 4
Wow, good call! I don't know how I constantly was missing that the (m-k) portion that should have been (n-k). And I even had it right in the non iterative equation.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Summation formula help Precalculus Mathematics Homework 2
Ok...then since I am wrong then formula for torque is wrong Introductory Physics Homework 5
Help on prooving a summation formula Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
Summation Formula help Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
What is the summation formula? Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 6