Conservation of momentum in combination of angular and linear momentum

In summary, the ball's linear momentum is reduced by the angular momentum gained by the paddle wheel, and the system retains its original kinetic energy.
  • #1
sr241
83
0
angular momentum and linear momentum is conserved, but what happen when combination angular momentum and linear momentum occurs?

for example a ball hits a horizontal paddle wheel on a base(which is free to move in any directions). then what happen to linear momentum of ball and paddle wheel? will it be equal to linear momentum before collision? or does the linear momentum after collision will be reduced by angular momentum gained by of paddle wheel (paddle wheel was initially at rest and due to tangential collision of ball it starts rotating after collision)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Both linear and angular momentum will be separately conserved during the collision.
 
  • #3
Yes, momentum before = momentum after; likewise angular momentum.

It is not that linear momentum gets "converted to" angular momentum. It is that your system of ball and paddle wheel already has angular momentum before the collision occurs. The ball's trajectory before collision is a straight line with tangential separation [itex]r[/itex] from the centre of mass of the paddle wheel. [itex]\vec L = \vec r \times \vec p[/itex]. Since [itex]r[/itex] and [itex]p[/itex] are non-zero, the ball-paddle system possesses angular momentum.
 
  • #4
m.e.t.a. said:
The ball's trajectory before collision is a straight line with tangential separation [itex]r[/itex] from the centre of mass of the paddle wheel. [itex]\vec L = \vec r \times \vec p[/itex]. Since [itex]r[/itex] and [itex]p[/itex] are non-zero, the ball-paddle system possesses angular momentum.

you mean the ball and paddle system possesses angular momentum before collision due to and [itex] \vec p [/itex] of ball ( which travels in straight line before collision) with respect to paddle wheel's CG.

But what about Kinetic Energy(KE) of ball and paddle system before and after collision, will it be split into rotational KE and Linear KE and their sum equals initial KE of Ball
 
Last edited:
  • #5
sr241 said:
you mean the ball and paddle system possesses angular momentum before collision due to and [itex] \vec p [/itex] of ball ( which travels in straight line before collision) with respect to paddle wheel's CG.
The angular momentum of the system depends on where you measure it from. Regardless, as long as there's no external torque on the system, angular momentum will be conserved.

If the ball travels in a straight line towards the paddle wheel's COG, why do you think it will start rotating? Originally you said the collision was 'tangential', which I interpreted to mean not along the COG.

But what about Kinetic Energy(KE) of ball and paddle system before and after collision, will it be split into rotational KE and Linear KE and their sum equals initial KE of Ball
In general, kinetic energy is not conserved--unless the collision is perfectly elastic (which is just a way of saying that the kinetic energy is conserved).
 
  • #6
no ball travels parallel to center of mass of paddle wheel and hit paddle wheel tangentially.

assume collisions are perfectly elastic. then what about rotational kinetic energy and linear kinetic energy, before and after collision. Will it conserved independently just as in case of linear and angular momentum. Or will it be sums of rotational and linear kinetic energy
 
  • #7
sr241 said:
no ball travels parallel to center of mass of paddle wheel and hit paddle wheel tangentially.
OK.
assume collisions are perfectly elastic. then what about rotational kinetic energy and linear kinetic energy, before and after collision. Will it conserved independently just as in case of linear and angular momentum. Or will it be sums of rotational and linear kinetic energy
The sum of linear and rotational KE will be conserved, not each separately.
 
  • #8
Doc Al said:
The sum of linear and rotational KE will be conserved, not each separately.

that means linear kinetic energy will be less after collision due to the rotational kinetic energy gained by paddle wheel, which was at rest before collision. right?
 
  • #9
sr241 said:
that means linear kinetic energy will be less after collision due to the rotational kinetic energy gained by paddle wheel, which was at rest before collision. right?
Right.
 
  • #10
28tfkmg.jpg


what happens when ball travels through center of mass of paddle wheel and base and hits paddle wheel tangentially . now how is going to be the conservation of angular momentum and linear momentum.

Also tell me about the conservation of Rotational and Linear Kinetic Energy
 
  • #11
sr241, in response to your diagram: my best guess of the situation after collision is as follows. (Let the point CM be the centre of mass of the paddle-base system. The ball has initial momentum [itex]{p_{{\rm{b,i}}}}[/itex] and final momentum [itex]{p_{{\rm{b,f}}}}[/itex].)

  • The paddle wheel rotates anticlockwise about its axle with angular momentum [itex]L[/itex] w.r.t. CM.
  • The paddle-base system rotates clockwise about CM with angular momentum [itex]-L[/itex] w.r.t. CM.
  • The paddle-base system has final linear momentum [itex]{p_{{\rm{pb}}}}[/itex] (rightwards).
  • The ball has final linear momentum [itex]{p_{{\rm{b,f}}}} = {p_{{\rm{b,i}}}} - {p_{{\rm{pb}}}}[/itex].

Momentum before = momentum after = [itex]{p_{{\rm{b,i}}}}[/itex].
Angular momentum before = angular momentum after = 0 (all w.r.t. CM).

(This is ignoring any complicating factors, such as the possibility of the ball's trajectory being deflected off-axis upon collision with the paddle. I'm assuming that the ball continues rightwards along its original linear trajectory, or else bounces normally off the paddle.)

This is just an intuitive guess, so please take my answer with a pinch of salt until somebody either confirms or refutes it.
 
  • #12
Doc Al said:
Both linear and angular momentum will be separately conserved during the collision.

from your earlier response it seems that ball and paddle wheel possesses some angular momentum. I have made a vector drawing of it.
1zbtid3.jpg


If ball possesses angular momentum before collision then that would be P2 and corresponding linear momentum would be P3. you mean to say P2 and P3 will separately conserved, then in a way it is the sum of P2 + P3 = P1 (actual linear momentum before collision) that is conserved. or in other words sum of angular momentum and linear momentum will be conserved. or say some part of initial linear momentumP1 will go into angular momentum
 
  • #13
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=



in the video linear momentum is conserved. and angular momentum is conserved by ball starts rotating in opposite direction of bar.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
sr241 said:
from your earlier response it seems that ball and paddle wheel possesses some angular momentum. I have made a vector drawing of it.

If ball possesses angular momentum before collision then that would be P2 and corresponding linear momentum would be P3. you mean to say P2 and P3 will separately conserved, then in a way it is the sum of P2 + P3 = P1 (actual linear momentum before collision) that is conserved. or in other words sum of angular momentum and linear momentum will be conserved. or say some part of initial linear momentumP1 will go into angular momentum
It took me a while to understand what you were doing with the vectors P1, P2, and P3. Vector P1 is the initial linear momentum of the ball. P2 and P3 are the components of P1 in the tangential and radial directions with respect to the center of mass of the paddle.

To calculate the angular momentum of the ball with respect to the original position of the paddle's center of mass, you would evaluate r X P1, where r is the position vector of the ball measured from the paddle's center of mass. This a vector cross product. The magnitude of that angular momentum will equal rP2. (Note: P2 is the tangential component of P1, not the angular momentum.)

In this collision, two things are conserved: The angular momentum and the linear momentum. The angular momentum I discussed above; the linear momentum is just P1 = P2 + P3.
 
  • #15
if two balls of same mass (a,b - a moving initially and b at rest) collides along center of mass; after collision a will be at rest and b will be moving with same velocity as "a". but if a's path is parallel to b's center of mass, a will not be at rest after collision; a will be moving along same path with velocity = a's initial velocity - b's final velocity, ( thus linear momentum is conserved) . but a and b starts rotating with respect to their center of mass in opposite direction. thus angular momentum is conserved, right ?

How to calculate a's and b's final velocity and angular velocity from the path and initial velocity of "a" ? does moment of inertia has anything to do with this?
 
  • #16
sr241 said:


in the video linear momentum is conserved. and angular momentum is conserved by ball starts rotating in opposite direction of bar.


In the video, after collision, the ball and paddle on the left rotate in opposite directions; but the ball and paddle on the right rotate in the same direction. I don't know what software you (or somebody) used to create this simulation, but it does not appear to be physically accurate. For a start, upon collision, the balls start rotating anticlockwise instantaneously of their own accord. There is no physical reason why they should do this. For the purposes of understanding this discussion, please ignore what you see in that video.

I might have confused things when I wrote, in my first post, "...the ball-paddle system possesses angular momentum." I ought to have added, "about its (the ball-paddle system's) own centre of mass".

Please note that the above applies to your diagram in post #12, i.e. in the case where the ball-paddle (or ball-paddle-base) system possesses non-zero angular momentum about its own centre of mass.

For your final question, regarding the two balls of equal mass, we need only consider the conservation laws which Doc Al has already stated: conservation of linear momentum, and conservation of angular momentum.

(For simplicity, let all trajectories lie in the x-y plane.)

Let's say ball A travels with velocity [itex]\vec u[/itex] along the positive [itex]x[/itex] axis. Ball A strikes ball B off-centre. Let the final velocities of A and B be [itex]\vec v[/itex] and [itex]\vec w[/itex] respectively. Then, due to conservation of linear momentum:

[tex]\left| {\vec u} \right| = {u_x} = {v_x} + {w_x}[/tex]
[tex]{v_y} + {w_y} = {u_y} = 0[/tex]
[tex] \Rightarrow {v_y} = - {w_y}[/tex]

For a perfectly elastic collision, balls A and B each rebound with zero spin, and their velocities are at 90º to each other. This conserves linear momentum and linear kinetic energy.

If the balls impart some rotation/spin to one another upon collision (due to friction, deformation etc.) then a portion of the initial kinetic energy of A is transferred to rotational/spin kinetic energy of A and B. The remainder of A's initial kinetic energy is transferred to linear kinetic energy of A and B. The balls' rebound velocities will then necessarily make an angle 0º < [itex]\theta [/itex] < 90º with each other. (Say if you need help proving this.)

My feeling is that if the balls do impart some spin angular momentum to one another, then the angular momentum of A will be equal and opposite to that of B. (I haven't proved this. Perhaps someone could comment...?)

The angular momentum of the system (w.r.t. some arbitrary point P) is constant. The linear momentum of the system is constant. The linear kinetic energy of the system can change. The rotational kinetic energy of the system can change.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #17


the video shows two equal mass bars collide their linear momentum is separately conserved. but they are spinning in same direction. could it be because of direction of n in the cross product for angular momentum = p*r*sin theta * n

in the first bar n is towards us and in second bar n away from viewer. thus angular momentum can be conserved separately even if bars are rotating in same direction.

then what is the significance of n in angular momentum?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. How does angular momentum relate to linear momentum in conservation of momentum?

In conservation of momentum, angular momentum and linear momentum are both conserved quantities. This means that the total amount of angular momentum and the total amount of linear momentum in a system will remain constant, even if they are transferred between different objects within the system.

2. Can angular momentum be converted into linear momentum and vice versa?

Yes, angular momentum can be converted into linear momentum and vice versa. This can happen when an object with angular momentum experiences a force that causes it to change its direction of motion, resulting in a change in its linear momentum. Similarly, a change in linear momentum can result in a change in angular momentum if the object's position changes in relation to its axis of rotation.

3. How does conservation of momentum in combination of angular and linear momentum apply to real-world situations?

Conservation of momentum in combination of angular and linear momentum is a fundamental principle in physics that applies to all types of motion, including the motion of objects in real-world situations. For example, it explains the motion of objects in sports such as figure skating, where a skater uses their arms to convert their angular momentum into linear momentum to perform a spin.

4. What role does the conservation of momentum in combination of angular and linear momentum play in collisions?

In collisions between objects, the total amount of momentum in the system is conserved. This means that the total amount of angular momentum and linear momentum before the collision is equal to the total amount of angular momentum and linear momentum after the collision. Conservation of momentum in combination of angular and linear momentum helps us understand and predict the outcome of collisions between objects.

5. Can conservation of momentum in combination of angular and linear momentum be violated?

No, conservation of momentum in combination of angular and linear momentum is a fundamental law of physics that has been observed to hold true in all physical systems. While individual objects within a system may experience changes in their angular and linear momentum, the total amount of angular momentum and linear momentum in the system will remain constant.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
895
Replies
6
Views
839
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Mechanics
2
Replies
53
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
1K
Back
Top