New Reply

Why must exponents be dimensionless?

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Feb8-13, 06:19 AM   #1
 

Why must exponents be dimensionless?


suppose we have ab
why must 'b' be dimensionless?

Mathematicians have defined crazy things over the centuries
so why haven't they defined this one?
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
mathematics news on PhysOrg.com

>> Mathematicians analyze social divisions using cell phone data
>> Can math models of gaming strategies be used to detect terrorism networks?
>> Mathematician proves there are infinitely many pairs of prime numbers less than 70 million units apart
Feb8-13, 07:08 AM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
"Dimensions", in the sense that you are using the word (meters, kilograms, degrees Celcius) are not mathematical objects, they are physical. If you are asking why no physics formula, with exponents, has no units on the exponent, you will have to ask a physicist.
 
Feb8-13, 07:45 AM   #3
 
I see, thank you sir.
 
Feb8-13, 08:33 AM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member

Why must exponents be dimensionless?


Quote by cocopops12 View Post
I see, thank you sir.
If x is a variable then you do something like:

$$e^x=\sum_n \frac{x^n}{n!}=1+x+\frac{x^2}{2!}+...$$

Now does that sum make sense if x has a dimension?

However the exponent can contain variables with dimensions but they must cancel to give a dimensionless number:

eg. $$M(t)=M_oe^{-\lambda t}$$
 
Feb8-13, 09:48 AM   #5
 
Mentor
Quote by cocopops12 View Post
suppose we have ab
why must 'b' be dimensionless?
If we restrict our attention to exponents that are positive integers, then an exponent means repeated multiplication. For example, x2 = x * x, and x3 = x * x * x.

The volume of a cube whose edge length is s is V = s3 = s * s * s. The units are tied to the variable s. All the exponent does is keep track of how many factors of s are present.
 
Feb8-13, 12:03 PM   #6
 
Quote by trollcast View Post
$$e^x=\sigma_n \frac{x^n}{n!}=1+x+\frac{x^2}{2!}+...$$
I think you meant $$e^x=\sum_n \frac{x^n}{n!}=1+x+\frac{x^2}{2!}+...$$

\Sigma works, though \sum tends to work a little better.
 
Feb8-13, 12:10 PM   #7
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by Whovian View Post
I think you meant $$e^x=\sum_n \frac{x^n}{n!}=1+x+\frac{x^2}{2!}+...$$

\Sigma works, though \sum tends to work a little better.
Oops, good trick with the \sum, I always wondered how to get the sigma bigger.

Fixed it now
 
Feb8-13, 01:36 PM   #8
 
There are matrix exponentials for a given matrix X of nxn dimensions defined similarly to the ordinary exponential of a number.

eX = [itex]\sum[/itex][itex]^{∞}_{k=0}[/itex] [itex]\frac{1}{k!}[/itex] Xk
 
Feb8-13, 02:10 PM   #9
 
Mentor
Quote by trollcast View Post
Oops, good trick with the \sum, I always wondered how to get the sigma bigger.

Fixed it now
Greek letters have upper and lower case forms: sigma is lowercase (##\sigma##) and
Sigma is uppercase (##\Sigma##).
 
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Why must exponents be dimensionless?
Thread Forum Replies
Dimensionless quantities General Engineering 8
must a wavefunction always be dimensionless? Advanced Physics Homework 1
congruence with numbers with exponents on top of exponents Precalculus Mathematics Homework 7
dimensionless anaylsis Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 0
Could someone Please help with DIMENSIONLESS VARIABLES. Differential Equations 1