Energy conservation of a rod in free space

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of applying impulse to a rod of uniform density in free space and the resulting energy gained. The speaker is confused about the conservation of energy and asks for clarification on their understanding of the topic. The responder explains that the distance the force is applied over, not the time, affects the energy transferred to the rod.
  • #1
Volkr16
2
0
Hey everyone,

A meager pea brain (me) is in need of some help from you fine physics gentlemen.
This is a concept I've spend a lot of time pondering on (more than I would like to admit).

Imagine a rod of uniform density in free space. If you apply impulse onto the center of mass then it will gain an energy (transverse) of E=1/2mv^2. If you apply an impulse off the center of mass then it will gain an energy of E=1/2mv^2+1/2Iw^2 (transverse+rotational).

Here is what I think I know: Let's assume that this rod gets hit perpendicular to it's length. No matter where it gets hit, the center of mass will have equal transverse motion for equal impulse applied. In other words Ft=mv for center of mass

So let's assume two scenarios, one where the impulse is applied off the center of mass and one where it is on the center of mass. Make the impulse be so, that the velocity of the center of mass will be the same in both cases (From what i stated before i should be able to use the same impulse anywhere on the rod).

My problem lies in the conservation of energy: I know if the impulse is applied off center i will have rotational energy, but i also know that I will have the same translational energy no matter where the rod get hit (perpendicular on the length). Something isn't right here.

Surely my "what i think i know" must be wrong. Could someone please elaborate why?

Thanks in advance,

Volker
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The same impulse means applying a given force for a given time. Depending on where you apply the force, the distance that the point of application travels during that time will be different - and the energy transferred to the rod is equal to the force times the distance, not the force times the time.
 
  • #3
  • #4
Thanks guys, that cleared it up. I searched a lot before posting this, but didn't find that thread - sorry
 
  • #5


Hi Volker,

Great question! It's important to understand that energy conservation is always true, but it can be a bit tricky to understand in certain situations. In this case, let's break down the two scenarios you mentioned and see how energy is conserved in each one.

Scenario 1: Impulse applied at the center of mass

In this scenario, the impulse is applied directly at the center of mass, causing the rod to have only translational energy. As you correctly stated, the energy gained is E=1/2mv^2. This energy is conserved because the impulse is applied directly at the center of mass, which means there is no torque acting on the rod. This means that there is no rotational energy being added to the system, so all of the energy gained is in the form of translational energy.

Scenario 2: Impulse applied off the center of mass

In this scenario, the impulse is applied off the center of mass, causing the rod to have both translational and rotational energy. The translational energy gained is still E=1/2mv^2, but now there is also rotational energy, as you correctly stated, of E=1/2Iw^2. This is where it may seem like energy is not conserved, as there is now more energy present in the system compared to the first scenario. However, energy is still conserved because the impulse applied off the center of mass also causes a torque on the rod. This torque causes the rod to rotate, and as a result, some of the translational energy is converted into rotational energy. The total energy gained in both forms (translational and rotational) is still equal to the impulse applied.

In both scenarios, the total energy gained is equal to the impulse applied. The key difference is in how that energy is distributed between translational and rotational forms. In the first scenario, all of the energy is in the form of translational energy, while in the second scenario, some of the energy is in the form of rotational energy. This is due to the presence of a torque in the second scenario.

I hope this helps clarify the concept of energy conservation in this scenario. Keep pondering and asking questions, it's a great way to deepen your understanding of physics!
 

What is energy conservation of a rod in free space?

Energy conservation of a rod in free space refers to the principle that the total energy of a rod, which includes kinetic energy and potential energy, remains constant in a system where there are no external forces acting upon it.

Why is energy conservation important for a rod in free space?

Energy conservation is important for a rod in free space because it helps us understand and predict the behavior of the rod. It allows us to determine the velocity, acceleration, and position of the rod at any given time.

What factors contribute to energy conservation of a rod in free space?

The two main factors that contribute to energy conservation of a rod in free space are the absence of external forces and the absence of friction. Without these factors, the total energy of the rod would not remain constant.

How does the law of conservation of energy apply to a rod in free space?

The law of conservation of energy states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred or transformed. This applies to a rod in free space as the total energy of the rod remains constant, it is just converted between kinetic and potential energy as the rod moves.

What are some real-life examples of energy conservation of a rod in free space?

One example of energy conservation of a rod in free space is a pendulum. As the pendulum swings back and forth, its total energy remains constant, with potential energy at its highest points and kinetic energy at its lowest points. Another example is a roller coaster, where the total energy of the coaster remains constant as it moves through its track.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
728
Replies
2
Views
855
Replies
15
Views
968
Replies
1
Views
435
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
963
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
986
Replies
7
Views
766
Back
Top