Sun can absorb almost 200,000 more Suns?

  • Thread starter victorvmotti
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Sun
In summary, Buchdahl's theorem sets the maximum mass-energy that can fit inside a sphere to ensure a static star. For the sun, this theoretical limit is much higher than its current mass and it could potentially absorb 200,000 more suns without collapsing. However, this assumes that the sun is made of incompressible and constant density material, which is not the case. Therefore, it is unlikely that the theoretical limit will be reached.
  • #1
victorvmotti
155
5
The maximum mass-energy allowable inside a sphere to ensure a static Star is obtained from Buchdahl’s Theorem:

M(max)=4/9*R/G*c^2

Calculations show that Sun can absorb almost 200,000 more Suns and remain it its current radius and stay away from collapsing.

Is this correct?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
With 200 000 times its mass, the sun would be a black hole where the event horizon would be roughly at the current surface of sun. For realistic objects, this is certainly beyond a collapse.

If you try to produce such an object by adding more and more mass from the outside, however, you produce a star with extremely strong stellar winds that will prevent more mass from getting added.
 
  • #3
mfb said:
With 200 000 times its mass, the sun would be a black hole where the event horizon would be roughly at the current surface of sun. For realistic objects, this is certainly beyond a collapse.

If you try to produce such an object by adding more and more mass from the outside, however, you produce a star with extremely strong stellar winds that will prevent more mass from getting added.

I was essentially trying to picture a thought experiment here.

How much mass-energy could fit into the current radius of Sun, referring to the condition of a static Star obtained from Buchdahl’s Theorem, which sets the upper limit.
 
  • #4
victorvmotti said:
The maximum mass-energy allowable inside a sphere to ensure a static Star is obtained from Buchdahl’s Theorem:

M(max)=4/9*R/G*c^2

Calculations show that Sun can absorb almost 200,000 more Suns and remain it its current radius and stay away from collapsing.

Is this correct?

Buchdahl's theorem assumes that the material the object (in this case the sun) is made of is incompressible and of constant density, i.e. that it's proper volume doesn't shrink under pressure. This isn't the case for the sun, so I wouldn't expect the theoretical maximum mass given by the theorem to be reached.
 
  • #5
Pretty much the only conditions of the theorem that the sun satisfies are that it has a mass and a radius.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #6
Let me quote from Sean Carroll in his book Spacetime and Geometry.

After introducing the maximum mass-energy allowable equation on page 234 he writes:

"Thus, if we try to squeeze a greater mass than this inside a radius R, general relativity admits no static solutions; a star that shrinks to such a size must inevitably keep shrinking, eventually forming a black hole. We derived this result from the rather strong assumption that the density is constant, but it continues to hold when that assumption considerably weakened."
 
  • #7
victorvmotti said:
Let me quote from Sean Carroll in his book Spacetime and Geometry.

After introducing the maximum mass-energy allowable equation on page 234 he writes:

"Thus, if we try to squeeze a greater mass than this inside a radius R, general relativity admits no static solutions; a star that shrinks to such a size must inevitably keep shrinking, eventually forming a black hole. We derived this result from the rather strong assumption that the density is constant, but it continues to hold when that assumption considerably weakened."

Your original post:
victorvmotti said:
Calculations show that Sun can absorb almost 200,000 more Suns and remain it its current radius and stay away from collapsing.

didn't state this. Your followup:
victorvmotti said:
How much mass-energy could fit into the current radius of Sun,

basically asserts correctly that Buchdal's theorem gives an upper limit to the mass that would fit into an object with the circumference of the sun. (We could quibble some over the difference between "radius of the sun" and "circumference of the sun", but I'm currently not thinking that the issue is important enough to argue about).

The point that the theoretical upper limit given by the theorem wouldn't be reached if you used the hydrogen/helium/other mix that the sun uses is the point I was trying to convey.

This isn't the case for the sun, so I wouldn't expect the theoretical maximum mass given by the theorem to be reached.
 
  • #8
pervect said:
Your original post:

but I'm currently not thinking that the issue is important enough to argue about.

Can you explain the difference and why is it so?
 

1. How can the Sun absorb almost 200,000 more Suns?

The Sun is a massive celestial body composed of mostly hydrogen and helium gases. Its immense gravitational force causes it to collapse on itself, creating extremely high temperatures and pressures at its core. This allows the Sun to fuse hydrogen atoms together, releasing huge amounts of energy in the form of heat and light. As a result, the Sun has the capability to absorb and convert a significant amount of matter into energy, making it capable of absorbing almost 200,000 more Suns.

2. What factors contribute to the Sun's ability to absorb such a large amount of matter?

The Sun's immense size and mass are the main contributing factors to its ability to absorb such a large amount of matter. Its strong gravitational pull allows it to draw in and capture a large number of particles, which are then converted into energy through nuclear fusion. Additionally, the Sun's internal temperature and pressure play a crucial role in sustaining the fusion reactions that power its energy output.

3. Is the Sun's absorption of matter a continuous process?

Yes, the Sun is constantly absorbing matter through its gravitational pull and converting it into energy through nuclear fusion. This process has been ongoing for billions of years and is expected to continue for billions more, until the Sun runs out of hydrogen fuel and enters its later stages of life.

4. Can the Sun's absorption of matter ever reach a limit?

While the Sun has the capability to absorb a significant amount of matter, it is not unlimited. Eventually, the Sun will consume all of its available hydrogen fuel and begin to expand and cool, becoming a red giant. At this point, its ability to absorb matter and produce energy will diminish, leading to its eventual death as a white dwarf.

5. How does the Sun's absorption of matter affect other objects in the solar system?

The Sun's immense gravitational pull not only allows it to absorb matter, but also holds the planets and other objects in the solar system in orbit around it. The energy produced by the Sun also provides heat and light to sustain life on Earth. However, the Sun's absorption of matter does not have a significant impact on the other objects in the solar system, as it is a relatively small amount compared to the overall size of the Sun.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
49
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
11
Views
570
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top