Identifying Physics Errors in a Star Trek Episode

In summary, the conversation discusses two potential physics errors in a Star Trek episode where a space station explodes. The first error is the presence of sound in the vacuum of space, which is not possible due to the absence of gas. The second error is the simultaneous observation of light and sound from the explosion by the crew of the Enterprise, as light travels faster than sound and they would not occur at the same instant.
  • #1
linhy
11
0

Homework Statement


In a star Trek episode, a space station orbiting a planet blows up. The chew of the Enterprise simultaneously hears and see the explosion; they realized that tehre is no chance for rescue. If you have been hired a consultant, what two physics errors would you have found and correct?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Since there is no gas in space, there should be no sound because sound can't travel if there is an absent in gas. ... and i don't know the othre reason... can someone help me understand it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Think about this part carefully:

The chew of the Enterprise simultaneously hears and see the explosion

LOL the "chew" :rofl:
 
  • #3
which means that.. they can't simultaneously see and hear because sound wave (longitudinal wave)travels much slower than transverse wave...?
 
  • #4
Yes, light travels faster that sound. So they couldn't see and hear the event at the same instant.
 
  • #5
thanks for the help.
 
  • #6
You're welcome. :smile:
 

1. What is the purpose of identifying physics errors in a Star Trek episode?

The purpose of identifying physics errors in a Star Trek episode is to separate fact from fiction and to ensure that the show stays true to the laws of physics. By pointing out any errors, we can better understand and appreciate the science behind the concepts presented in the show.

2. How do you determine if a physics error has occurred in a Star Trek episode?

To determine if a physics error has occurred, we must first have a good understanding of the laws of physics and how they apply to the situation presented in the episode. Then, we can analyze the scene and look for any discrepancies or violations of these laws. This may involve using equations, principles of physics, and common sense to identify errors.

3. What are some common examples of physics errors in Star Trek episodes?

Some common examples of physics errors in Star Trek episodes include: sound being transmitted through space, objects moving faster than the speed of light, and gravity working differently in different parts of the universe. These are all violations of known laws of physics and are often pointed out by viewers and scientists alike.

4. How do physics errors affect the overall scientific accuracy of Star Trek?

Physics errors can greatly affect the overall scientific accuracy of Star Trek. While the show does take creative liberties and is not meant to be a completely accurate representation of science, errors can undermine the credibility of the show and make it less relatable to viewers who have a better understanding of physics. However, some may argue that these errors add to the entertainment value of the show and do not significantly impact its overall message.

5. What can be learned from identifying physics errors in Star Trek episodes?

By identifying physics errors in Star Trek episodes, we can learn about the limitations of our current understanding of physics and how it applies to the fictional world of the show. We can also gain a better understanding of the laws of physics and how they shape our understanding of the universe. Additionally, it allows us to appreciate the efforts of the writers and producers in incorporating scientific concepts into the show, while also recognizing where they may have taken creative liberties.

Similar threads

  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top