Why is p=fv different than calculatingit manually

  • Thread starter jiggleswiggly
  • Start date
When using the formula P = F * v, you're finding the instantaneous power at that specific moment. In summary, the sprinter's power output at 1.70, 3.60, and 5.50 seconds is 131 watts. The magnitude of the horizontal force acting on the sprinter is 87.5 Newtons. While both methods may seem like they should yield the same result, the difference lies in the fact that one is calculating the average power over a period of time while the other is calculating the instantaneous power at a specific moment.
  • #1
jiggleswiggly
4
0
A 49.0 sprinter, starting from rest, runs 45.0in 7.10 at constant acceleration.
What is the magnitude of the horizontal force acting on the sprinter?


okay so I got 87.5N which is correct

Then it asks:
What is the sprinter's power output at 1.70 , 3.60 , and 5.50 ?


why is it when you use d=1/2*a*t^2
it is wrong

see:
(1/2)*(1.78)(1.7)^2 = 2.57 for distance

then 2.57*87.5= 224 joules

then for power it is 224/1.7 = 131

but the answer is exactly twice that

if you use p=f*v you get the correct answer straight away

shouldn't these be the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Because the power output isn't constant, and when you're calculating the power using the distance traveled and the time elapsed, you're finding the average power up to that point, not the instantaneous power.
 

1. Why is it important to understand the difference between calculating p=fv and doing it manually?

Understanding the difference between calculating p=fv and doing it manually is important because it can help you save time and avoid errors in your calculations. It also allows you to better understand the underlying principles and concepts behind the equation.

2. What is the main difference between calculating p=fv and doing it manually?

The main difference between calculating p=fv and doing it manually is the level of accuracy. Manual calculations are prone to human error, while using the equation p=fv ensures a more precise and consistent result.

3. Is there a specific situation where it is better to use the p=fv equation instead of doing it manually?

Yes, there are many situations where using the p=fv equation is more beneficial. For instance, when dealing with large or complex numbers, using the equation can save a significant amount of time and reduce the risk of making mistakes.

4. Can you provide an example of when using the p=fv equation would be more efficient than doing it manually?

Sure, let's say you need to calculate the power (p) of an object that has a force (f) of 50 Newtons and a velocity (v) of 10 meters per second. Using the equation p=fv, you would simply multiply 50 by 10 to get a power of 500 watts. Doing this manually would require multiple steps and potentially lead to errors.

5. Are there any drawbacks to using the p=fv equation instead of doing it manually?

One potential drawback of using the p=fv equation is that it may not always be applicable to every situation. There may be instances where manual calculations are more appropriate or necessary. Additionally, relying solely on equations can limit your understanding of the underlying principles and concepts.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
17K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
37
Views
8K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top