|Feb27-13, 01:15 AM||#18|
Black hole vs Black hole
Good evening Chill Factor. I must be missing something here. Are you saying that it is impossible in principle to station an observer at a position and in a manner such that he is at rest with respect to the black hole? Am I missing something when I read in the textbooks that to an observer not falling into the black hole and in a location well beyond the strongly curved spacetime near the hole that time will appear to slow in the close vicinity of the hole? Are you saying that if, someday, we discover a black hole within, say, a few hundred lightyears and its orientation is such that with the future's greatly improved space telescopes we can actually resolve the space occupied by the event horizon, that we will, in fact, be able to see infalling matter actually pass through the horizon? I think I understand the electromagnetics you mention, but I'm afraid I cannot see the analogy. But thanks.
|Feb27-13, 03:22 AM||#19|
It is possible to station an observer at a position at respect to the black hole if they were very far away; this observer will *see things slow down as they fall towards the black hole*. Of course, the falling things will also *exponentially redshift and dim away* which makes them visually "look" like they are falling in. Since light is actually discrete, the last photon that leaves will reach your eyes in a finite and quite short time, and then there's no more images; that's why you can "see" things fall through black holes. This is because the coordinate called "t", which corresponds to proper time in your far-away frame, does not necessarily correspond to proper time in another frame.
If YOU were the one falling in, for a black hole with a large mass, you won't even *know* when you fell through the event horizon, because your proper time τ does not correspond to the time outside t.
|Feb27-13, 06:25 AM||#20|
You can read more in the second section of this reference.
But to reply directly, if the infalling object is not a mathematical point, but actually has a size, it will not reach infinite speed before it falls in, and so time wont "stop". Even a point only reaches light speed at the exact same instant it "falls in".
Also even if time "stops" for the infalling object, it does not stop for the outgoing event horizon.
Second point; A black hole space time (with one dimension suppressed) resembles a pencil. I think you should ignore the point of the pencil and concentrate on the cylindrical barrel. That is where the conventional description applies.
Further, if you include quantum effects, the object can "tunnel in".
Your original math is correct as far as it goes, but it doesn't capture the whole picture.
|Similar Threads for: Black hole vs Black hole|
|Black hole temperature derived from entropy (heat from black hole?)||General Physics||3|
|Relativistic mass increase appearing to form a black hole vs. a real black hole||Special & General Relativity||9|
|Time dilation and black-hole--black-hole mergers, and ringdown gravitational waves||Special & General Relativity||13|
|Is it possible to escape a black hole's event horizon in a binary black hole system||Astrophysics||6|
|Update FAQ? Re: black hole originated from anti-matter colliding with black hole||General Physics||3|