The Mystery of Planetary Cores: Fission or Fusion?

In summary: For example, our own sun is classified as a star because it is estimated to have a core temperature of about 15 million degrees Celsius.
  • #1
so-crates
294
0
Is it know why the Earth's core, and indeed the cores of other planets, are "hot" while some are cold? Is it possible that fusion or fission processes are taking place there ?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #2
No, there's not a chance of any thermonuclear fission or fusion reactions there.

How do scientists know if the core is not? If a celestial body is big enough the core will be hot inevitably, because of the compression of internal materials by gravity. Bodies such as satellites and Pluto have cold cores because of insufficiency of gravity, I'm guessing.
 
  • #3
Is it that, the sun contains thermonuclear fusion specificly because it is of high enough mass?
 
  • #4
Compression of mass is static and the terrestrial planet would cool off eventially abeit in hundred millions years.

Temperature of the core is around 5500K, way too hot to be residual from the initial compression. Hence there is a heat generator inside. What is it? take your pick, the following are candidates:

radiogenic decay from heavy atoms U - Th series
40K decay.

Or perhaps Core - mantle friction (section 3.2)?
 
  • #5
Could you please explain why it would cool off? How do geologists know how hot the core is?
 
  • #6
Sure, Why it would cool off is also answered here although it seems that the links to the original is broken.

http://www.geo.lsa.umich.edu/IHFC/heatflow.html you can see the interior heat flow at the surface of the Earth. It appears to average about 100 milli watt per second per square meter. And there are a lot of square meters.

Anyway, this seems to be an excellent place where the heat balance of the Earth is presented.

More later
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
Mk said:
Is it that, the sun contains thermonuclear fusion specificly because it is of high enough mass?

Yes, the enormous mass of a star is required to generate the necesasry pressure/temperature to get atoms to undergo fusion (occurs in the central core of the star). Actually, astronomical objects are classified as stars only if they can sustain fusion in their core.
 

1. What is the mystery surrounding the planetary cores?

The mystery surrounding planetary cores is whether they were formed through fission, the splitting of a larger body, or fusion, the combining of smaller bodies. This debate has been ongoing for decades and has not yet been definitively answered.

2. What is the evidence for fission as the origin of planetary cores?

One piece of evidence for fission as the origin of planetary cores is the fact that many planets and moons have irregular shapes, which could be due to them being formed from the breaking off of a larger body. Additionally, the composition of some planetary cores is similar to that of the larger body they are thought to have originated from.

3. What evidence supports the idea of fusion as the origin of planetary cores?

Some scientists argue that the high temperatures and pressures necessary for fusion to occur are more likely to be found in the early stages of a planet's formation, making it a more plausible explanation for the creation of planetary cores. Additionally, the formation of certain types of minerals found in planetary cores can also be explained by fusion processes.

4. How does the debate surrounding planetary cores impact our understanding of planet formation?

The debate surrounding planetary cores is important because it can provide insights into the early stages of planet formation and the processes that shape the structure and composition of planets. Understanding the origin of planetary cores can also help us better understand the formation of our own planet, Earth.

5. What are some current research efforts focused on solving this mystery?

Scientists are currently using a variety of techniques to study planetary cores, including analyzing data from space missions, conducting experiments in laboratories, and using computer simulations. These efforts aim to gather more evidence and data to help determine whether fission or fusion is the dominant process in the formation of planetary cores.

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
517
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
832
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
463
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
952
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
52
Views
3K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
9
Views
773
Back
Top