OK Corral: Local versus non-local QM

  • Thread starter wm
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Local Qm
In summary, The conversation discusses the issue of local versus non-local interpretations of quantum mechanics, specifically in relation to the EPRB experiment with spin-half particles. The participants hope to resolve the issue using mathematics. The concept of Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) is introduced and explained as a way to understand the distribution of information in the universe and how it relates to Alice's and Bob's worlds.
  • #246
1. We can predict experimental results using QED.
2. The 4-potential [tex]A^{\mu}[/tex] is unobservable.

Surely we don't have to make a choice, but rely on experiment ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #247
Ontoplankton said:
I disagree. A wavefunction is a much simpler thing than the collection of all humans and their experiments. Occam would tell you to derive the latter from the former (as in MWI) rather than somehow taking it as given.
Actually, it is quite possible that you can do without a wavefunction (I guess Occam would be happy):smile: In http://www.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0509044 , the Klein-Gordon-Maxwell electrodynamics is discussed, the unitary gauge is chosen (meaning the wavefunction is real), and it is proven that one can eliminate the wavefunction from the equations and formulate the Cauchy problem for the 4-potential of electromagnetic field. That means that if you know the 4-potential and its time derivatives at some moment in time, you can calculate them for any moment in time, or, in other words, the 4-potential evolves independently.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
945
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
50
Views
3K
Replies
49
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top