FTL Signals and the Paradox of Causality

In summary, the concept of relativity states that a faster-than-light (FTL) signal in one reference frame will appear to travel backwards in time in another reference frame. This can be seen in the example of a high-speed spacecraft leaving Earth, where both the spacecraft and Earth would perceive FTL signals as traveling through time in opposite directions. However, the idea of experiencing time dilation on the spaceship is not accurate. If FTL signals were possible, it would be possible for both the spaceship and Earth to send and receive messages that appear to travel backwards in time.
  • #1
Sanders
7
0
This is a pretty basic concept of relativity that used to make sense to me but I have since become a little unclear on the issue.

The question is how can one violate the principle of causality simply by broadcasting information that travels faster-than-light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Because a FTL signal going forward in time in one reference frame will go backwards in time in some other reference frame.
 
  • #3
Originally posted by Hurkyl
Because a FTL signal going forward in time in one reference frame will go backwards in time in some other reference frame.

How would you describe this with a high-speed (.95c) spacecraft leaving Earth?

The spaceship, experiencing time dilation, would be sending messages into the past while Earth would be sending messages into the future, correct?
 
  • #4
There is no such thing as "experiencing time dilation"...

Anyways, that aside, (assuming it is possible to send FTL signals) it is possible both for the Earth to send an FTL signal which the spaceship perceives as going backwards in time, and it is possible for the spaceship to send a FTL signal which Earth would perceive as going back in time.
 

1. What is causality and how does it relate to FTL signals?

Causality is the concept that events have a cause and effect relationship, meaning that one event causes another to happen. FTL (faster-than-light) signals, which are signals that appear to travel faster than the speed of light, can potentially violate causality by allowing information to be sent back in time.

2. Can FTL signals actually exist and violate causality?

Currently, there is no evidence to suggest that FTL signals are possible. According to Einstein's theory of relativity, the speed of light is the fastest possible speed for any object or signal. If FTL signals were to exist, they would violate this fundamental principle and have not been observed in any experiments.

3. What are some proposed theories about FTL signals and causality?

Some theories suggest that FTL signals could exist in certain conditions, such as through the use of wormholes or quantum entanglement. However, these theories are still hypothetical and have not been proven to be possible.

4. What are the potential consequences of violating causality with FTL signals?

If FTL signals were to exist and violate causality, it could lead to paradoxes and contradictions in the laws of physics. For example, it could allow for the possibility of traveling back in time and changing events, which could fundamentally alter the course of history.

5. How does the study of causality and FTL signals impact our understanding of the universe?

The study of causality and FTL signals is important for understanding the fundamental laws of the universe and how they govern the behavior of matter and energy. It also helps us to explore the limits of what is possible and what may be beyond our current understanding. By studying these concepts, we may gain a deeper understanding of the nature of space, time, and the universe itself.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
5
Replies
145
Views
12K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
44
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top