What is the definition of a 'true vector'?

In summary: As you've pointed out, it is common in more advanced courses. If you're having trouble following, try looking up Linear Algebra books.
  • #1
JonDrew
64
0
In my class notes my professor defined a true vector as a vector which does not depend on origin placement. Once he defined it he went on with an example of how a vectors magnitude is conserved in two different coordinate systems.

So my question is what is the definition of a true vector? Is it just a vector whose magnitude does not depend on origin placement?

he also defined "other vectors" as vectors who's magnitude does not change upon rotation and for some reason I think he referred to these as scalers, which doesn't make sense to me.

He told us that both scalars and vectors are both tensors but I still don't see the point he was trying to make.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Either you have completely misunderstood your professor or your professor has no idea what he's talking about.

I have never heard of the terms "true vectors" or "other vectors" before and I find your post very weird (not saying that that's your fault necessarily).

I would suggest you get a basic linear algebra book such as "An introduction to Linear Algebra" by Lang and work through that.
 
  • #3
micromass said:
Either you have completely misunderstood your professor or your professor has no idea what he's talking about.

I was worried about that, it is possible that I am just confused on an over simplifications then.

I would suggest you get a basic linear algebra book such as "An introduction to Linear Algebra" by Lang and work through that.

Thanks micro.
 
  • #4
JonDrew said:
In my class notes my professor defined a true vector as a vector which does not depend on origin placement. Once he defined it he went on with an example of how a vectors magnitude is conserved in two different coordinate systems.

So my question is what is the definition of a true vector? Is it just a vector whose magnitude does not depend on origin placement?

The standard terminology is bound vectors vs free vectors.

Here's the difference in a nutshell. Imagine four distinct points in space, A, B, A', and B', such that the line segments AB and A'B' are parallel and of equal length. At least for displacement vectors, it's quite common to use a directed line segment as a representation of a vector. The key distinction: Does the start point / end point matter? With free vectors (or true vectors, or just vectors), the start and end points don't matter. [itex]\vec{AB}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{A'B'}[/itex] represent the same vector. With bound vectors, those start and end points do matter. In this context, [itex]\vec{AB}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{A'B'}[/itex] are distinct bound vectors. Given another pair of points C and C' such that BC and B'C' are parallel and of equal length, [itex]\vec{A'B'} + \vec{BC}[/itex] doesn't make sense in the context of bound vectors. It makes perfect sense in the context of free vectors (or just vectors).Please don't shoot the messenger. This is a somewhat widespread nomenclature. I personally an not a fan of this nomenclature. Adding the qualifier "bound" implies that a "bound vectors" are a kind of vector. They're not. They fall in the class of things that are not-quite-vectors rather than being a kind of vector.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
There are such things as "pseudovectors". Perhaps that is part of what the professor was saying.
 
  • #6
The term "free vector" refers to the mathematical structure called an affine space.
http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~cis610/geombchap2.pdf
http://cmp.felk.cvut.cz/cmp/courses/pvi2003/LectureNotesPVI2003/Points-and-Vectors.pdf

The term "bound vector" refers to the mathematical structure called a vector space (the subject of linear algebra).

In the following, I will use "vector" in the linear algebra sense. Newtonian physics has vectors such as the velocity vector. This is a member of the tangent vector space at each spatial position. Spatial positions in Newtonian physics are not vectors - they are points in an affine space, which has no preferred origin. However, if we assign for convenience and convention a preferred spatial position as the origin of a coordinate system, then spatial positions can be described by position vectors.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Stephen Tashi said:
There are such things as "pseudovectors". Perhaps that is part of what the professor was saying.

Yes, and also covectors. Such terminology is not considered in elementary courses.
 

1. What is a vector in science?

A vector in science is a quantity that has both magnitude and direction. It is typically represented by an arrow pointing in the direction of the vector and with a length proportional to its magnitude.

2. What is the definition of a true vector?

A true vector is a vector that possesses all of the properties of a vector, including magnitude, direction, and the ability to be added or subtracted with other vectors in a vector space.

3. How is a true vector different from a scalar?

A scalar is a quantity that only has magnitude and no direction, while a true vector has both magnitude and direction. For example, temperature is a scalar quantity, while velocity is a true vector.

4. Can a true vector have a negative magnitude?

Yes, a true vector can have a negative magnitude. This indicates that the vector is in the opposite direction of its positive counterpart. For example, a velocity vector with a magnitude of -10 m/s is moving in the opposite direction of a velocity vector with a magnitude of 10 m/s.

5. What are some examples of true vectors in science?

Some examples of true vectors in science include velocity, force, displacement, and magnetic fields. These quantities all have both magnitude and direction and can be represented by arrows in a vector space.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
14
Views
700
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top