I only glanced at the first one.ENQUISITIVE said:these are not cetripetal vortexs.
Ooh, thanks Dave, that's why I couldn't tell why it looked like a mix between a tornado and a dust devil, it's a gustnado. Never heard of it, and I live in the midwest.davenn said:The first one is a gustnado often seen along the gust front of an approaching storm
its not in the right place in the stormcell for it to be a tornado.
The second one is very indistinct... I will go with gustnado for similar reasons to the first videoclip.
the third one hmmmmm... unfortunately the cloudbase directly above the rotation was never shown and without that info I cannot tell you if its a gustnado or a tornado
That one really got its act together after coming off the water, didnt it ! cool
I get to see all sorts of wonderful things like that during my stormchasing trips around the USA and Australia
All 3 are clearly related to the storm activity which makes them gustnadoes / tornadoes
its their positional relationship to the stormcell which determines which of those 2 they are.
They are all typical vortex's ... there is no question of that! :)
Some common characteristics used to identify a phenomenon include its observable properties, patterns, and behaviors. Scientists may also use specific measurements or data to identify a phenomenon.
Scientists use the scientific method to determine the cause of a phenomenon. This involves making observations, forming hypotheses, conducting experiments, and analyzing data to support or reject the hypotheses.
Yes, multiple phenomena can occur simultaneously. It is not uncommon for multiple phenomena to interact and influence each other.
No, not all phenomena are predictable. Some phenomena, particularly those in complex systems, may exhibit chaotic behavior and cannot be accurately predicted.
Scientists use rigorous methods and multiple lines of evidence to ensure the accuracy of their identification of a phenomenon. This includes peer review, replication of experiments, and careful analysis of data.