Motivation for SU(2) x U(1) and charge operator

In summary, the choice of the Gauge group \mathrm{SU}(2)_\mathrm{L}\times \mathrm{U}(1)_\mathrm{Y} is justified by the fact that the electromagnetic charge and the flavour-changing weak charge do not form a closed SU(2) current algebra. To solve this issue, an additional U(1) group is added and the photon is interpreted as a superposition of the U(1) and the neutral SU(2) gauge fields. The charge operator Q is defined as Q = I_z + {1 \over 2} Y in the Gell-Mann–Nishijima phenomenological formula, which relates SU(2) weak isospin I_z, weak
  • #1
jdstokes
523
1
I've read that the choice of Gauge group [itex]\mathrm{SU}(2)_\mathrm{L}\times \mathrm{U}(1)_\mathrm{Y}[/itex] can be justified by the fact that the electromagnetic charge and the flavour-changing weak charge do not form a closed SU(2) current algebra. The solution is to tack on an additional U(1) group and to interpret the photon as a superposition of the U(1) and the neutral SU(2) gauge fields.

I saw this explained somewhere by the fact that since the charge operator is

[itex]Q = \left(
\begin{matrix}
0 & 0 \\
0 & -1
\end{matrix}
\right)[/itex],

it does not commute with any of the Pauli matrices. Can anyone explain where this definition of the charge operator comes from? I'm failing to understand even what the charge operator is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Maybe it comes from Gell-Mann–Nishijima phenomenological formula which relates SU(2) weak isospin [tex]I_z[/tex], weak hypercharge [tex]Y[/tex] and electric charge [tex]Q[/tex]?

[tex]\qquad Q = I_z + {1 \over 2} Y[/tex]
 
  • #3


The motivation for using the gauge group SU(2) x U(1) in particle physics is rooted in the need to explain the observed behavior of particles under the weak and electromagnetic interactions. The weak interaction is responsible for the decay of particles and the electromagnetic interaction is responsible for the interaction between charged particles.

The choice of SU(2) x U(1) gauge group can be justified by looking at the charges associated with the weak and electromagnetic interactions. The electromagnetic charge, also known as electric charge, is associated with the U(1) group. On the other hand, the weak charge, which is responsible for flavor-changing interactions, does not form a closed SU(2) current algebra. This means that the weak charge does not behave like a traditional SU(2) charge, and therefore an additional U(1) group is needed to explain its behavior.

The charge operator is a mathematical representation of the electric charge. In the case of SU(2) x U(1) gauge group, the charge operator is given by the matrix Q, as shown in the provided equation. This operator is used to describe the behavior of particles under the electromagnetic interaction. The fact that this operator does not commute with any of the Pauli matrices is a consequence of the non-commutative nature of the SU(2) group.

To understand the definition of the charge operator, it is important to first understand what the charge of a particle is. In particle physics, the charge of a particle is a fundamental property that determines how it interacts with other particles. The charge operator is simply a mathematical representation of this property. It is defined in such a way that it describes how the particle's charge changes under a particular gauge transformation.

In summary, the motivation for using the SU(2) x U(1) gauge group and the charge operator is rooted in the need to explain the behavior of particles under the weak and electromagnetic interactions. The charge operator is a mathematical representation of the electric charge and is defined in a way that describes its behavior under gauge transformations.
 

1. What is SU(2) x U(1)?

SU(2) x U(1) is a mathematical notation for a particular symmetry group in physics. It is a combination of the special unitary group SU(2) and the unitary group U(1). In particle physics, it describes the electroweak force, which is responsible for the interactions between elementary particles.

2. How is SU(2) x U(1) related to the Standard Model of particle physics?

The Standard Model of particle physics is a theoretical framework that describes the fundamental particles and their interactions. SU(2) x U(1) is a crucial part of this model as it represents the symmetry group for the electroweak force, which is one of the four fundamental forces in nature.

3. What is the role of the charge operator in SU(2) x U(1)?

The charge operator is a mathematical object that is used to describe the electric charge of particles in the SU(2) x U(1) symmetry group. It is an important tool for understanding the interactions between particles and is a fundamental concept in the Standard Model of particle physics.

4. How does SU(2) x U(1) and the charge operator relate to the Higgs mechanism?

The Higgs mechanism is a crucial part of the Standard Model that explains how particles acquire their mass. In SU(2) x U(1), the Higgs mechanism is responsible for breaking the symmetry between the electroweak force and the strong nuclear force, giving particles their masses. The charge operator plays a role in this process by determining the electric charge of particles.

5. What are the practical applications of understanding SU(2) x U(1) and the charge operator?

Understanding SU(2) x U(1) and the charge operator is essential for furthering our understanding of the fundamental building blocks of the universe. It has practical applications in particle accelerators, where scientists study the interactions between particles to gain insight into the laws of nature. It also has implications in fields such as cosmology and astrophysics, where knowledge of particle physics is crucial for understanding the origins and evolution of the universe.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top