| New Reply |
constant velocity joints vs. universal joint. |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Nov15-12, 11:23 AM | #1 |
|
|
constant velocity joints vs. universal joint.
i have to design an actuation system which will change the angle with which the power is transmitted through a motor,the range of angle is about,--35 to +35,w.r.t to the vertical,what should i use,a u joint or a velocity joint?there is a predefined load on the shaft(bending + torsional),what should i use?
i have on other option to use a hub motor to deliver power,that will eliminate most of the complexities,but i am not sure whether a hub motor is capable of withstanding minor shocks,and bending stresses. |
| Nov15-12, 04:34 PM | #2 |
|
|
I am not a Mechanical Engineer but I think you would need to specify a few values before you can expect an answer. So far the answer must be "It depends", I think.
|
| Nov16-12, 12:44 AM | #3 |
|
Recognitions:
|
The range of motion for your application is pretty large. Universal joints are best used when the range of motion is only a few degrees; with larger angles, they can freeze up and they will experience higher wear and shorter life than a comparable CV joint.
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: constant velocity joints vs. universal joint.
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Gruebler's Equation on 3 Universal joints 3 prismatic joints dof calculated 0 ? | Mechanical Engineering | 0 | ||
| Universal Gas constant R | Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework | 1 | ||
| Universal joint/ball bearing.... controlled rotating arm for a furniture fitting | Mechanical Engineering | 6 | ||
| Is there really a universal constant? | General Discussion | 20 | ||
| A universal constant? | Chemistry | 9 | ||