Destructive Interference of gamma waves

In summary, the conversation discusses the topic of destructive and constructive interference and its applicability to other forms of radiation. It also delves into the concept of energy conservation in relation to interference. The experts explain that destructive interference does not destroy energy, but rather redistributes it to areas of constructive interference. They also mention that the phenomenon can be mathematically modeled using Maxwells equations.
  • #1
waiwithheng
2
0
I do not understand the full theory behind destructive interference. Hence I need helps:

1. The topic on destructive (and constructive) interference was always discussed on light and sound wave. Will this theory applicable on other radiation such as gamma?

2. During two wavelenghts met at a point with completely opposite phase, does the cancellation occur at that point with loss of energy? If so, how does the energy balance? does it still obey the energy conversation? if so, can provide some explanation on this?

Thank you.

Looking forward for some good discussion and explanation.

Regards.
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi. I can't really help you, but I do want to point out one thing: gamma is light. It's just an unpleasant form of it. Although we tend to think of light as being just the visible and near-visible (IR and UV) components, they're all part of the electromagnetic spectrum.
 
  • #3
For question 2, in free space, whenever you have destructive interference in one location you have constructive interference somewhere else. Energy is not created nor destroyed, it is simply moved away from regions of destructive interference towards regions of constructive interference.
 
  • #4
DaleSpam said:
For question 2, in free space, whenever you have destructive interference in one location you have constructive interference somewhere else. Energy is not created nor destroyed, it is simply moved away from regions of destructive interference towards regions of constructive interference.

Hi DaleSpam,

I agreed with you. But if I induce destructive interference to a single photon (gamma radiation, and to reduce complexity of gamma radiation so let's simplify the example) would I still be able to observe constructive interference together with destructive interference?

btw, have you come across mathematical models on destructive and constructive interference especially on energy and mass conversative?

Thank you.
 
  • #5
Light is EM radiation, Gamma is EM radiation of high energy.

If you were to induce interference with a single photon i.e. youngs slit experiment you will have constructive and destructive interference and a situations such as dale explained.
Displacement is additive when talking about superposition therefore if one wave with amplitude/displacement of +2 meets another 180 degrees to it with the same amplitude (displacement -2) the resultant will be 0.
 
  • #6
waiwithheng said:
But if I induce destructive interference to a single photon (gamma radiation, and to reduce complexity of gamma radiation so let's simplify the example) would I still be able to observe constructive interference together with destructive interference?

If you "fire" a single photon through an apparatus that produces interference (two slits or something else), and is "ideal" in the sense that it doesn't absorb or lose the photon through some other process, the photon always ends up somewhere. You can't really "observe" the interference using a single photon.

If you "fire" many photons through the apparatus, more of them will arrive at locations of constructive interference, and fewer of them will arrive at locations of destructive interference, but again none of them are destroyed. The interference process simply distributes them according to a certain pattern.
 
  • #7
waiwithheng said:
I agreed with you. But if I induce destructive interference to a single photon (gamma radiation, and to reduce complexity of gamma radiation so let's simplify the example) would I still be able to observe constructive interference together with destructive interference?
Yes. For a single photon, destructive interference simply means a location where the probability it is there is low. Since the probability that it is somewhere is 1, if the probability goes down in one location (destructive interference) then it must go up in another (constructive interference).

waiwithheng said:
btw, have you come across mathematical models on destructive and constructive interference especially on energy and mass conversative?
I am not sure what you mean. Maxwells equations is the mathematical model. Both interference and energy conservation can be derived from Maxwells equations.
 

1. What is "Destructive Interference of gamma waves"?

Destructive interference is a phenomenon in which two or more gamma waves of the same frequency intersect and cancel each other out, resulting in a decrease in the overall amplitude of the wave.

2. How does destructive interference occur?

Destructive interference occurs when the peaks and troughs of two or more gamma waves align and cancel each other out. This can happen when the waves originate from different sources or when they reflect off of different surfaces.

3. What are the effects of destructive interference on gamma waves?

The main effect of destructive interference on gamma waves is a decrease in the overall energy of the wave. This can result in a weaker signal or a complete cancellation of the wave.

4. Can destructive interference be controlled or manipulated?

Yes, destructive interference can be controlled or manipulated by adjusting the amplitude, frequency, or phase of the gamma waves. This is often used in applications such as noise-cancelling headphones, where destructive interference is used to cancel out unwanted sound waves.

5. What are the real-world applications of destructive interference of gamma waves?

Destructive interference of gamma waves has several practical applications, including noise-cancelling technology, acoustic imaging, and medical imaging. It is also used in the fields of telecommunications and radar to improve signal quality and reduce interference.

Similar threads

Replies
54
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
891
Replies
4
Views
313
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
53
Views
7K
  • Electromagnetism
2
Replies
48
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top