Can we view the string theory as defined on special 2-D time?

In summary, the coordinates of points X\mu are dependent on both (\tau1, \tau2) in 2-dimensional time. If \tau2 is infinite, it is an open string, and if \tau2 is finite, it is a closed string. The concept of a second time parameter, \tau2, is known as the "worldsheet point of view" in contrast to the 4D (or 10D) "space time point of view". However, a system can only have one past and future, so it will still have just one time parameter. The presence of multiple signatures, such as (- - + + +...), does not necessarily indicate a two-timed theory.
  • #1
Osiris
20
0
Since now time is 2-dimensional, coordinates of points X[tex]\mu[/tex] are dependent on both ([tex]\tau[/tex]1, [tex]\tau[/tex]2), and
if [tex]\tau[/tex]2 is infinite, it's a open string;
if [tex]\tau[/tex]2 is finite, it's a closed string.


How do you think so?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It is so, but it is not a second time, just a parameter, let's call sigma (for "space"). What you say is called the "worldsheet point of view", as oppossed to the 4D (or 10D) "space time point of view".
 
  • #3
As long as a (any) system has only one past and one future, it will have just one time parameter. There may be theories with signatures like (- - + + +...) - as in F-theory - but that alone does not mean it is a two-timed theory.
 
1)

What is the string theory and how is it defined on a special 2-D time?

The string theory is a theoretical framework in physics that aims to explain the fundamental nature of particles and their interactions. It proposes that the most basic building blocks of the universe are not point-like particles, but tiny one-dimensional strings. These strings vibrate at different frequencies, giving rise to the various particles and forces in the universe. The string theory can be defined on a special 2-D time, also known as "worldsheet", which is a 2-dimensional surface that describes the motion of the string.

2)

Why is the string theory defined on a 2-D time?

The string theory is defined on a 2-D time because it is believed to be the most suitable framework for unifying quantum mechanics and general relativity. In this theory, the 2-D time represents the dynamics of the strings, while the 1-D space represents the dimensions of the universe. By defining the theory on a 2-D time, it allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the fundamental forces and particles in the universe.

3)

How does the string theory on special 2-D time differ from traditional string theory?

The traditional string theory, also known as the bosonic string theory, is defined on a 26-dimensional spacetime. However, the string theory on special 2-D time, also known as the superstring theory, is defined on a 10-dimensional spacetime. This difference in dimensions allows for the inclusion of fermions, which are particles with half-integer spin, and thus provides a more realistic description of the universe.

4)

What are some implications of viewing the string theory on special 2-D time?

Viewing the string theory on special 2-D time has several implications. One of the main implications is the potential to unify all fundamental forces, including gravity, into one theory. This could also potentially lead to a better understanding of the origins of the universe and the nature of space and time. Additionally, the string theory on special 2-D time has implications for the development of new technologies, such as quantum computing.

5)

What are the challenges and limitations of studying the string theory on special 2-D time?

Studying the string theory on special 2-D time is a complex and challenging task. One of the main challenges is the lack of experimental evidence, as it is difficult to test the predictions of the theory. Additionally, the mathematics involved in the string theory can be highly complex and difficult to understand. The theory also faces limitations in its ability to make accurate predictions, as it is still a work in progress and requires further development and refinement.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
41
Views
8K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top