Length contraction problem of right angled triangle

In summary, the situation is shown in the attachment. The right angled frame of rods is moving at a speed perpendicular to its hypotenuse. According to length contraction, the corresponding lengths of sides should contract. However, because the hypotenuse is perpendicular to the direction of motion, the "legs" are each oblique to the direction of motion. For an oblique angle, you can separate that into a parallel and perpendicular component. The perpendicular component will not length contract at all, only the parallel component. So no matter how great the length contraction, you will always have a triangle (though not a right triangle). However, I am not getting the reason why the lengths of sides should tilt towards the hypotenuse as if they are
  • #1
djsourabh
69
0
http://https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=56297&stc=1&d=1362318192 problem:-
The situation is shown in attachment.
the right angled frame of rods (in stationary ) is moving at speed v perpendicular to its hypotenuse.
according to length contraction the corresponding lengths of sides should contract.
So it may not remain a right angled triangle in moving frame.
but if 'V' is such that L*cos(90-a) contracts such that L contracts than half of hypotenuse (h/2) .
we know that hypotenuse can not contract .
Also both L(AB) & L(AC) contract less than h/2. what happens in that case?
(L is the length of each side, consider isosceles triangle.
∠a is the angle opposite to point A)
 

Attachments

  • problem.png
    problem.png
    3.8 KB · Views: 576
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
djsourabh said:
The situation is shown in attachment.
The attachment is missing.
 
  • #3
i am trying to figure out why.
 
  • #4
OK, in the meantime I will answer from what I can understand by your verbal description as much as possible. From your description it sounds like the hypotenuse is perpendicular to the direction of motion and the "legs" are each oblique to the direction of motion. For an oblique angle you can separate that into a parallel and perpendicular component. The perpendicular component will not length contract at all, only the parallel component. So no matter how great the length contraction you will always have a triangle (though not a right triangle).
 
  • #5
thank you i got what you are trying to tell.
but i am not getting the reason why the lengths of sides should tilt towards hypotenuse as if they are going to coincide hypotenuse.why their position or angle should change?
and how?
 
  • #6
Imagine, instead of a triangle, you have a series of rods of different lengths all stacked closely together. Each rod is oriented parallel to the direction of travel (perpendicular to the hypotenuse), the front ends are lined up with the hypotenuse, and the length of each rod is such that the back end lands on one of the legs of the triangle. So the outline of the stack of rods coincides with the triangle.

Now, each rod is going parallel to the direction of travel, so each one is contracted according to the standard length contraction formula. What is the resulting outline shape?
 
  • #7
yes sir ,resulting locus is the sides of triangle.
thank you for your answers.
 

What is the length contraction problem of a right angled triangle?

The length contraction problem of a right angled triangle is a theoretical concept in physics that suggests that the lengths of the sides of a triangle may appear to differ when viewed from different reference frames, due to the effects of relativistic length contraction.

How does the length contraction problem affect the measurements of a right angled triangle?

The length contraction problem can affect the measurements of a right angled triangle by making the sides of the triangle appear shorter when viewed from a reference frame that is moving relative to the triangle. This is due to the phenomenon known as length contraction, which occurs at high velocities.

Is the length contraction problem of a right angled triangle a real phenomenon?

Yes, the length contraction problem of a right angled triangle is a real phenomenon that has been observed and confirmed through numerous experiments and observations in the field of physics. It is a fundamental consequence of Einstein's theory of special relativity.

Can the length contraction problem of a right angled triangle be observed in everyday life?

No, the effects of length contraction are only observable at extremely high velocities, close to the speed of light. In everyday life, the velocities at which we move are not high enough to cause noticeable differences in the measurements of a right angled triangle.

How does the length contraction problem of a right angled triangle relate to the theory of special relativity?

The length contraction problem is a direct consequence of Einstein's theory of special relativity, which states that the laws of physics are the same for all inertial reference frames. This theory explains how the measurements of an object can appear different when viewed from different frames of reference that are moving at high velocities relative to each other.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
54
Views
711
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
5
Replies
166
Views
11K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
821
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
115
Views
8K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
60
Views
3K
Back
Top