Register to reply

Fermi surface for metals

by aaaa202
Tags: fermi, metals, surface
Share this thread:
aaaa202
#1
Nov4-13, 08:31 AM
P: 1,005
Does this construction even make sense? By definition it is a surface of constant energy in k-space, so for the free electron it is a sphere. But for metals you have band structure so that a given k-vector can have several different energies associated with it.
Which of these are to be chosen?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Organic photovoltaic cells of the future: Charge formation efficiency used to screen materials
Promising ferroelectric materials suffer from unexpected electric polarizations
Structure of certain types of beetle shells could inspire brighter, whiter coatings and materials
mfb
#2
Nov4-13, 04:16 PM
Mentor
P: 11,815
For free electrons (or for an approximation), choose the model for free electrons, otherwise don't choose that?
Electrons in metals see a potential structure, if this can be neglected or not depends on your problem.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Fermi surface in alkaline earth metals- metallic behaviour in different dimensions Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 0
What's the difference between a Luttinger surface and a Fermi surface? Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 1
Instability of Fermi surface Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 11
Fermi level in metals touching each other Advanced Physics Homework 0
Fermi-Dirac statistics valid for electron gas in metals? Quantum Physics 5