Is it possible that nature laws constants changed over time

In summary, it is possible that the constants that govern the laws of physics was different during other periods of our universe history. Experimentalists keep looking for evidence of a change, but so far all evidence indicates there is no change.
  • #1
TeCNoYoTTa
15
0
I am wondering ? is it possible that the constants that govern the laws of physics was different during other periods of our universe history ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It is possible. So far all observations concerning this issue have indicated no change, but experimentalists keep looking.
 
  • #3
mathman said:
It is possible. So far all observations concerning this issue have indicated no change, but experimentalists keep looking.

Thanks, but is it really possible to observe such thing ?
for example if the light speed in the beginning of the universe was different, then suddenly the already existing photons and the newly produced photons acted based on a different speed. Is such thing observable ?
 
  • #4
TeCNoYoTTa said:
I am wondering ? is it possible that the constants that govern the laws of physics was different during other periods of our universe history ?
I believe that there is an entire philosophy behind questions which start off with Is it possible... This philosophy is based on the principle that no observation is logically inconsistent. What does that mean in practice? It means that we can't merely say with absolute certainty that certain things are true or false because its conceivable that some day, in some way an observation could prove something to be true where it was postulated to be false in the past. For example: Suppose someone who lived in the days when it was accepted that the Earth was flat. The hypothesis then was the Earth was flat and if one asked "Is the Earth flat?" the one the person who answered in the positive was doing so in agreement with the hypothesis of that day. Not let's consider the question "Is the Earth a sphere" but asked today. The answer is "Yes." But how would one answer "Is it possible that the Earth is flat?" if it was also asked today? I would say not. It's not possible.

I'm forming this idea from an insight shared in the article Possibility of Faster-Than-Light Particles by G. Feinberg, Physical Review, July 25, 1967. The author writes
It is perhaps worthwhile noting that particles which travel faster than light d not involve logical inconsistencies. Indeed, no observation can be logically inconsistent.*
The footnote reads I am in debt to Dr. M. Tausner for this remark.

So let’s be clear that if we say that something is possible it does not mean that it's true or a fact. What we may agree is possible may in fact be wrong. Is it possible that the president had only eggs for breakfast? Yes. Is it possible that the president had only bacon for breakfast? Yes.

But all in all we have to be concerned with where this really gets us to. I.e. if a researcher believes that he can create a free-energy machine and we agree that such a thing is possible (in the sense that it's possible for a law of thermodynamics to be wrong) it doesn't mean we should believe it.

There is a fruitcake on one of those “ancient aliens” programs that comes on TV every now and then. Erik Van Daniken is one of them. He starts posing questions “Is it possible that aliens visited our ancestors and built runways in the mountains and that’s where those straight lines we see there come from?” or “Is it possible that all those artworks that are only visible to beings in the air were drawn for ancient aliens? After all they can only be seen from high up in the air!”

What Van Daniken neglects to say is that ancient people had gods which they worshipped and they believed that those gods resided in the “heavens.”
 
Last edited:
  • #5
It is definitely possible. In the case of the vacuum energy of space, we are pretty sure it is a non-constant constant. I am not sure if this could be observed directly, but I imagine there would be clever indirect ways we might deduce such a thing, at least for some variables.

The idea that constants change over space and time is in fact advocated by several prominent theorist including Leonard Susskind, Victor Stenger, and others. In these cases, the "universe" means the string-theory multiverse, and across this universe the constants of nature take on different values in different places in space, and can change over time.

Susskind has a great book on this called "the Cosmic Landscape".
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

1. How can we determine if the nature laws constants have changed over time?

Scientists use various methods to study the laws of nature and their constants. These include observational data, mathematical models, and experiments. By analyzing these data, scientists can determine if there have been any changes in the constants over time.

2. What evidence supports the idea that nature laws constants have remained constant?

One of the main pieces of evidence supporting the idea that nature laws constants have remained constant is the fact that our current understanding of the laws of nature has been consistent and accurate in predicting and explaining natural phenomena. Additionally, scientists have not observed any significant changes in the constants through various experiments and observations.

3. What could cause nature laws constants to change over time?

One possible explanation for changes in nature laws constants over time could be the influence of external factors, such as cosmic events or shifts in the Earth's environment. Another possibility is that our understanding of these constants may evolve as our scientific knowledge and technology advances.

4. Are there any examples of nature laws constants changing over time?

There are some examples of small changes in nature laws constants over time, such as the gradual decrease in the strength of Earth's magnetic field. However, these changes are relatively small and do not significantly impact our understanding of the laws of nature.

5. What implications would a change in nature laws constants have on our understanding of the universe?

A change in nature laws constants could have significant implications for our understanding of the universe. It could potentially challenge our current theories and models, and require us to revise or develop new ones to explain natural phenomena. It could also lead to a better understanding of the fundamental laws that govern our universe.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
520
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
7
Views
880
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
8
Views
477
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
828
Back
Top