Register to reply 
Help understanding proof involving Maxwell equation 
Share this thread: 
#1
Apr214, 09:59 PM

P: 57

I'm currently taking a course on mathematical methods for physics.
(Like always I'm a bit confused about where exactly I should post these questions, should it go to the homework forum? ) anyway as I was reading the lecture notes I found this demonstration that if [itex] \vec{J} = 0 [/itex] in MaxwellAmpere's law satisfies the wave equation: [itex] \left( \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}  \nabla^2 \right)\vec B = \vec 0 [/itex] : There is one small step I'm not sure why/how he did it. he took the curl of [itex] \nabla \times\vec B [/itex], that is, [itex]\nabla\times\left(\nabla\times\vec B \right) = \nabla\left(\nabla\cdot\vec B\right)  \nabla^2\vec B [/itex] then since [itex] \nabla\cdot\vec B = 0 [/itex] and [itex] \nabla\times\vec B = \mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\partial\vec E}{\partial t} [/itex] he says [itex] \nabla\times\left(\nabla\times\vec B \right) = \nabla\left(\mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\partial\vec E}{\partial t}\right) = \mu_0\epsilon_0\left(\nabla\times\frac{\partial\vec E}{\partial t}\right) [/itex] so far I understand everything, but now he says: [itex] \mu_0\epsilon_0\left(\nabla\times\frac{\partial\vec E}{\partial t}\right) = \mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\partial\left(\nabla\times\vec E\right)}{\partial t} [/itex] and it is this very last step that I'm not sure if it's allowed. And if is, why it is? the rest of the demonstration follows easily, supposing this last step is correct. 


#2
Apr314, 12:05 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 2,953

That step just says that time derivatives commute with the curl. You should try this out for yourself and see that it is so. (Basically it's true simply because partial derivatives commute and the basis vectors are not timedependent.)
Just write out the curl of E, take the time derivative. Then write out the curl of the time derivative of E and they are identical. 


#3
Apr314, 12:21 AM

Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 13,134

You missed one:
$$ \left( \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}\nabla^2 \right)\vec B = 0\\ \implies \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}\vec B =\nabla^2\vec B\\ \implies \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}\vec B = \nabla(\nabla\cdot\vec B)\nabla\times (\nabla\times \vec B)$$ Note: $$\nabla\cdot\vec B = 0\\ \nabla\times \vec B = \mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\vec E\\ \nabla\times \vec E = \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\vec B$$ https://www.google.co.nz/search?q=ma...hrome&ie=UTF8 


#4
Apr314, 12:33 AM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 1,911

Help understanding proof involving Maxwell equation
By Cairault's theorem [see http://calculus.subwiki.org/wiki/Cla...ixed_partials] continuous partial derivatives commute.



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Suggestion Linking to crank or crackpot sites is prohibited. , discussion.  Forum Feedback & Announcements  10  
Is E in MaxwellEquations really E ?  Classical Physics  11  
In binary can we have a value with deci centi mili or more lower valued prefix?  Computers  14  
100% Mathematical Proof vs Vellmen's How to Prove it  Science & Math Textbooks  3  
Two Reviews: God's Equation and Universe In A Nutshell  Science & Math Textbooks  9 