Prove E > V(min) in Schroedinger Equation

  • Thread starter emob2p
  • Start date
  • Tags
    General
In summary, this proves that if an equation has a concave or convex function on the negative or positive infinity, the function is not normalizable.
  • #1
emob2p
56
1
I'm trying to prove that E must exceed the minimum value of V(x) for all normalizable solutions to the Schroed. eq. To do this I am going to show that in the case E < V(min), the wave function is not normalizable. Naturally I began with the normalization condition: int(|phi|^2)=1 and started taking derivatives on this. However, I cannot arrive at a contradiction. Any thoughts? Or any other ways to show the same result? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
emob2p said:
I'm trying to prove that E must exceed the minimum value of V(x) for all normalizable solutions to the Schroed. eq. To do this I am going to show that in the case E < V(min), the wave function is not normalizable. Naturally I began with the normalization condition: int(|phi|^2)=1 and started taking derivatives on this. However, I cannot arrive at a contradiction. Any thoughts? Or any other ways to show the same result? Thanks.

this is just of the top of my head here, but you need to solve the schrödinger equation with the fact that E - V < 0. I am going to assume that you know how to solve second order differential equations so when you solve :

(-h'²/2m * f'' + V * f) = E * f (f is the wavefunction, f" is the second derivative and h' is h devided by 2 * pi)

you get : f" - (2m/h'²)*(V - E)f = 0 and the coëfficiënt (let's call this k²)of f is positive here so the solutions will be a superposition of exp(kx) and exp(-kx). So k² = (2m/h'²)(V-E) and the equation becomes f" = k²f

Now try searching for infinities : when x goes to the positive infinity one of the two exponential will become infinite and the same will occur when x goes to the negative infinite. We are not able to find a solution that is finite everywhere this this corresponds to an unphysical state...

regards
marlon
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Is there a way to prove in general if a function and its second derivative are always the same sign, then the function is not normalizalbe since this is essentially the case with E < V(min)?
 
  • #4
emob2p said:
Is there a way to prove in general if a function and its second derivative are always the same sign, then the function is not normalizalbe since this is essentially the case with E < V(min)?

Well,
Just plot any function f with these two properties. You will clearly see that |f| will always "grow" without limit when x goes to either the positive or negative infinity. When f and f" > 0 then f will be concave upwards and if they are negative then f will be concave downwards...just check this out...
and suppose that f is zero in some point x then this point is also zero for the second derivative meaning that the function will go from convex (under the x-axis) to concave (above the x-axis)...the switch happens in the point x

marlon
 

1. What is the meaning of "E" and "V(min)" in the Schroedinger Equation?

E represents the total energy of the system, while V(min) represents the minimum potential energy of the system.

2. How is the Schroedinger Equation used to prove that E > V(min)?

The Schroedinger Equation mathematically describes the behavior of a quantum system, and when solved, the resulting energy value (E) must be greater than the minimum potential energy (V(min)) in order for the system to be stable.

3. Why is it important to prove that E > V(min) in the Schroedinger Equation?

Proving that E > V(min) ensures that the system is in a stable state, and that the energy of the system is above the minimum required for its existence.

4. Can the Schroedinger Equation be used for all quantum systems?

Yes, the Schroedinger Equation is a fundamental equation in quantum mechanics and can be applied to all quantum systems, from atoms to molecules to larger systems.

5. Are there any limitations to using the Schroedinger Equation to prove E > V(min)?

The Schroedinger Equation is based on certain assumptions and may not accurately describe all quantum systems, particularly those involving high energy or relativistic effects. Additionally, the solutions to the equation may not always be exact and can involve approximations.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
543
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
857
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top